About this pandemic
- Thread starter delldude
- Start date
Insp4
Veteran
- May 27, 2016
- 6,084
- 906
How many days Bears?......... How many days tell the first debate?
Insp4
Veteran
- May 27, 2016
- 6,084
- 906
Come on Bears, when you try to attack the individual and not the subject at hand, it just shows you have no means of disputing it!
xUT
Veteran
xUT
Veteran
OP
- Thread Starter
- #249
You should do some research..... America's Grandfather, Dr Anthony Fauci, has put into effect, along with CDC Hahn, to admit people to the hospital AFTER they have been sick and have breathing problems......it is then they think HCQ is effective, and by then, most die.....so HCQ bad.... HOWEVER, it has been found that administering HCQ within seven days of the onset of C-19, has survivability rates of upwards of 68%.
The media has been caught lying about procedures and trials.
“Drug promoted by Trump as coronavirus game-changer increasingly linked to deaths,” blared the headline. Written by three Post staff writers, the story asserted that the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in treating COVID-19 is scant and that the drug is inherently unsafe. This claim is nonsense.
Biased against the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 -- and the Washington Post is hardly alone -- the paper described an April 21, 2020, drug study on U.S. Veterans Affairs patients hospitalized with the illness. It found a high death rate in patients taking the drug hydroxychloroquine. But this was a flawed study with a small sample, the main flaw being that the drug was given to the sickest patients who were already dying because of their age and severe pre-existing conditions. This study was quickly debunked. It had been posted on a non-peer-reviewed medical archive that specifically warns that studies posted on its website should not be reported in the media as established information.
Yet, the Post and countless other news outlets did just the opposite, making repeated claims that hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and caused serious cardiac problems. Nowhere was there any mention of the fact that COVID-19 damages the heart during infection, sometimes causing irregular and sometimes fatal heart rhythms in patients not taking the drug.
Washington Post reporters Ariana Cha and Laurie McGinley were back again on May 22, with a new article shouting out the new supposed news: “Antimalarial drug touted by President Trump is linked to increased risk of death in coronavirus patients, study says.” The media uproar this time was based on a large study just published in the Lancet. There was just one problem. The Lancet paper was fraudulent and it was quickly retracted.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...t_the_media_continues_to_besmirch_143875.html
So your favorite lemming is right.
OP
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Similar threads
