1 VF-1 2NV
Advanced
- Mar 12, 2006
- 131
- 1
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080626/american_ai..._cuts.html?.v=1
That's it . Wonder how many union jobs are going to be lost? :down:
That's it . Wonder how many union jobs are going to be lost? :down:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meanwhile their hiring more managers at DFW...http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080626/american_ai..._cuts.html?.v=1
That's it . Wonder how many union jobs are going to be lost? :down:
Meanwhile their hiring more managers at DFW...
It will probably be done the way they used to do it in Information Technology at Texaco when I was there. They would announce that they were eliminating 15 management jobs and boxes on the org chart. They would then publish they new org chart. Wonderful!
Two weeks later, they would fire 15 programmers, put those 15 managers (some of whom hadn't programmed in 15-20 years, if ever) in those jobs with no cut in salary and only a change in job title. Those 15 would sit around doing nothing but bemoaning their fate and pointing out how it was some other manager who should have been axed. In the meantime the remaining worker bees were expected to pick up the slack and cover the work of the 15 who were fired.
I know you think management has job security for life, but I know of a couple folks at HDQ who recently found jobs outside of AMR and simply didn't want to wait to see if they'd be cut or if they'd be able to get a package. I'd be shocked if the same thing isn't happening elsewhere.
At some point, the people who can get more money elsewhere are going to start to do so, and AA's going to have to backfill those positions once they fall below what they see as the post % minimum. This has happened every time there's been warnings of a layoff in management, and every time y'all show the same faux disbelief...
Such a difference in perspective! Damn - where is this company at you're talking about? I haven't seen it during my employment at American. You're really not attempting to say things really happen the way you describe, are you? That would imply your belief those of us who have watched this come down a number of times didn't really see what we saw. You know the line: "Who are you going to believe - me or your lying eyes?"
During the last significant layoff (TUL), new positions were created and the management losers shuffled into them with the only loss being that of a job title. Only a few supervisors were sent out and those were the ones who could get their people to work get along with them - only the dregs were kept. No - the ones who left did not do so voluntarily either, so don't try that explaination.
Sorry, Mr. eolesen - management layoffs are no more than a popularity contest (suction evaluation) and a sham for the benefit of the workers here at American or any other company I've worked in my years.
I guess I hallucinated about all the empty cubes created during the six different management cuts that happened during my 15 years at HDQ.
If you're right about having 11 supvs/managers for 350 employees, perhaps you've probably got too few supervisors...
Typical management/front line ratios for shift work should be around 1:20 -- this looks like 1:31
I guess I hallucinated about all the empty cubes created during the six different management cuts that happened during my 15 years at HDQ.
How, then, did other places I've worked manage to squeak by with much thinner management coverage than AA if the company doesn't pad its ranks with fishing buddies?If you're right about having 11 supvs/managers for 350 employees, perhaps you've probably got too few supervisors.
Typical management/front line ratios for shift work should be around 1:20 -- this looks like 1:31