traderjake
Veteran
What does this have to do with pilots?
OK, I'll change it.
"Honey, you didn't build that popsicle stick control tower."
What does this have to do with pilots?
Honey, You Didn't Build That
The West has finally figured how Silver is going to rule. It is over.
All I know for sure is that no matter what happens, you will still be an azzhole.
Sounds like APA might be getting to them.
I certainly hope so, and more power to them in all dealings with their little batch of lying-thieving, greed-soaked, narcicisstic sociopaths....umm...I mean "management".
You just gotta stop mincing words.
Driver...
I don't suppose any of these dingbats that throw the word "scab" around, are supporting the "scab" referees by attending or watching the NFL?
What!? Not a "scab"?.....Are you feeling OK tonight?
Feeling fine, thanks for asking...in reference to Claxhole's post...I have thought on what Silver will say, and it ain't as claxhole put it, "over".
Silver will affirm the 9th, the TA and the company's liability for breach.
Good. Being stuck in this labor squabble doesn't count to me as sufficent cause to seriously wish anyone ill health or harm...and it'll all pass in time anyway. I'm not much convinced that any final answer will come from Judge Silver's court myself, and this could well drag on...not that such is any ideal situation.
We differ (not surprisingly) in your notion that the 9th indeed assigned ANY directly presumptive liability for supposed breach = not-the-nic. A ruling inclusive of noting that the nic might not be used, yet the issue would become ripe to litigate with a ratified contract, hardly equates to any "The nic is it!" ruling to my mind. Time and only time will tell the tale.....Who knows really? Nothing that ever comes forth from courtrooms truly surprises me anymore.
If the former US Air pilots refuse to accept the Nicolau seniority list, then then next thing they ought to do is suspend the AWA pilot dues until this "squabble" is complete. What say you?