B6 Announces DL Schedule Reductions for them (how nice)
My question is why does a carrier that is flooding already full markets with capacity make the case that it is the incumbents fault? B6 should be equally, if not more, responsible for removing capacity but blames DL for overcapacity?? Once DL removes capacity, B6 adds and the overcapacity issue remains...only thing that changes is that B6 gets more share and more revenue.
I don't feel too sorry for B6 in this case. If I come along with two extra cards to add to an already full deck of 52, I don't put the blame on the dealer for having too many cards. It would be nice to see some rational thought from Neelman regarding "rational capacity". Who is to blame?
My question is why does a carrier that is flooding already full markets with capacity make the case that it is the incumbents fault? B6 should be equally, if not more, responsible for removing capacity but blames DL for overcapacity?? Once DL removes capacity, B6 adds and the overcapacity issue remains...only thing that changes is that B6 gets more share and more revenue.
I don't feel too sorry for B6 in this case. If I come along with two extra cards to add to an already full deck of 52, I don't put the blame on the dealer for having too many cards. It would be nice to see some rational thought from Neelman regarding "rational capacity". Who is to blame?