BREAKING NEWS: US Airways Election Dates Announced!

Sep 9, 2002
1,881
57
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20572 (202) 692-5000
June 7, 2013
VIA EMAIL
E. Allen Hemenway Sito Pantoja, General Vice President
Vice President Labor Relations David Neigus, Associate General Counsel
Paul D. Jones International Association of Machinists
Vice President Legal Affairs & & Aerospace Workers
Chief Compliance Officer 9000 Machinists Way
Ron Harbinson Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Managing Director Labor Relations
US Airways Carmen Parcelli, Esq.
111 W. Rio Salado Parkway Guerrieri, Clayman, Bartos, Parcelli
Tempe, AZ 85281 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Suite 700
David Bourne, Director Airline Division Washington, DC 20036
Nicholas Manicone, Esq.
Kim Keller, Organizer
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
25 Louisiana Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Re: NMB Case No. R-7362
US Airways/IBT/IAM
Participants:
The National Mediation Board (Board) has authorized an election in the above-referenced case. The election will be conducted by Telephone Electronic Voting and Internet Voting. The Notice and Sample Instructions will be sent out on July 1, 2013. The Voting Instructions will be mailed to the employees on July 8, 2013. The voting period will be from 12:01 a.m., ET, July 8, 2013, through August 12, 2013. The tally will take place at the Board’s offices on August 12, at 2 p.m., ET.
Participants should notify the Board whether they intend to renew preauthorization challenges and objections to the List of Eligible Voters (List) submitted on May 28, 2013; May 31, 2013; June 3, 2013; and June 4, 2013. The Board will consider these during the challenges and objections period. Any additional challenges to the List or objections with regard to any other matters must be filed by 4 p.m., ET, on June 17, 2013. Responses to challenges or objections, if any, must be filed by 4 p.m., ET, on June 24, 2013. All challenges and objections must be filed in writing with the Investigators. All submissions must comply with the simultaneous service requirements of the Board Representation Manual (Manual) Section 1.2. All challenges and objections must be supported by April 19, 2013 Page 2
substantive evidence and argument. Unsupported allegations will be insufficient to overcome presumptions of eligibility or ineligibility as reflected by the List of Potential Eligible Voters. In addition, if craft or class issues are involved, the objection must be supported by Board case citation. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Board will not consider evidence on appeal unless it has been initially filed with the Investigators by the above deadline. See Manual Section 10.2.
If a challenge is filed which involves adding an individual to the List, the Carrier should immediately provide the individual’s data in spreadsheet format as well as a mailing label for that individual so that Voting Instructions may be sent in a timely fashion. The vote will only be counted if a final determination is made that the individual is eligible.
The Investigator will deny all challenges and objections not supported by substantive evidence and argument, not filed by deadline, or not simultaneously served on all participants.
Changes in eligibility status occurring after the deadline will be handled as status changes subject to Manual Section 12.3. Status changes will not be considered without supporting documentation including the effective date of the change. Status changes provided less than seven (7) calendar days before the scheduled count will not be considered, absent extraordinary circumstances.
Due to the security policy of the building where the NMB offices are located, participants must provide the names of each individual who will be attending the tally no later than two business days prior to the tally. Please email the names of the attendees to [email protected].
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Eileen M. Hennessey
Investigator
Angela I. Heverling
Investigator
 
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20572 (202) 692-5000
June 7, 2013
VIA EMAIL
E. Allen Hemenway Sito Pantoja, General Vice President
Vice President Labor Relations David Neigus, Associate General Counsel
Paul D. Jones International Association of Machinists
Vice President Legal Affairs & & Aerospace Workers
Chief Compliance Officer 9000 Machinists Way
Ron Harbinson Upper Marlboro, MD 20772
Managing Director Labor Relations
US Airways Carmen Parcelli, Esq.
111 W. Rio Salado Parkway Guerrieri, Clayman, Bartos, Parcelli
Tempe, AZ 85281 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Suite 700
David Bourne, Director Airline Division Washington, DC 20036
Nicholas Manicone, Esq.
Kim Keller, Organizer
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
25 Louisiana Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Re: NMB Case No. R-7362
US Airways/IBT/IAM
Participants:
The National Mediation Board (Board) has authorized an election in the above-referenced case. The election will be conducted by Telephone Electronic Voting and Internet Voting. The Notice and Sample Instructions will be sent out on July 1, 2013. The Voting Instructions will be mailed to the employees on July 8, 2013. The voting period will be from 12:01 a.m., ET, July 8, 2013, through August 12, 2013. The tally will take place at the Board’s offices on August 12, at 2 p.m., ET.
Participants should notify the Board whether they intend to renew preauthorization challenges and objections to the List of Eligible Voters (List) submitted on May 28, 2013; May 31, 2013; June 3, 2013; and June 4, 2013. The Board will consider these during the challenges and objections period. Any additional challenges to the List or objections with regard to any other matters must be filed by 4 p.m., ET, on June 17, 2013. Responses to challenges or objections, if any, must be filed by 4 p.m., ET, on June 24, 2013. All challenges and objections must be filed in writing with the Investigators. All submissions must comply with the simultaneous service requirements of the Board Representation Manual (Manual) Section 1.2. All challenges and objections must be supported by April 19, 2013 Page 2
substantive evidence and argument. Unsupported allegations will be insufficient to overcome presumptions of eligibility or ineligibility as reflected by the List of Potential Eligible Voters. In addition, if craft or class issues are involved, the objection must be supported by Board case citation. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Board will not consider evidence on appeal unless it has been initially filed with the Investigators by the above deadline. See Manual Section 10.2.
If a challenge is filed which involves adding an individual to the List, the Carrier should immediately provide the individual’s data in spreadsheet format as well as a mailing label for that individual so that Voting Instructions may be sent in a timely fashion. The vote will only be counted if a final determination is made that the individual is eligible.
The Investigator will deny all challenges and objections not supported by substantive evidence and argument, not filed by deadline, or not simultaneously served on all participants.
Changes in eligibility status occurring after the deadline will be handled as status changes subject to Manual Section 12.3. Status changes will not be considered without supporting documentation including the effective date of the change. Status changes provided less than seven (7) calendar days before the scheduled count will not be considered, absent extraordinary circumstances.
Due to the security policy of the building where the NMB offices are located, participants must provide the names of each individual who will be attending the tally no later than two business days prior to the tally. Please email the names of the attendees to [email protected].
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Eileen M. Hennessey
Investigator
Angela I. Heverling
Investigator

I am a AMT at AA and I would like to say some words here at the US Air Forum.

US Air M&R. Please spread the word amongst your piers that the IBT and the IAM is not your only choice. Lets rid ourselves of these unaccountable, back door dealing unions. You have another choice,

WRITE IN AMFA!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Why would you want to waste a vote on AMFA when by Common Sense they show not to have the support at AA by not getting on the ballot.
And you may end up with the TWU/IAM???

DO YOU REALLY THINK AMFA GOT SURPRISED BY THE IBT FILLING and did not have time to get ready to file after they said they would file in may! (IMO Common Sense)
 
Why would you waste a vote on the ibt?

Track record at UA/CO speaks for itself.

Highest percentage of outsourcing.

Most pensions in financial trouble.

Didnt support the BCTGM at Hostess.

Oversight by the government for mafia ties and corruption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Why would you waste a vote on the ibt?

Track record at UA/CO speaks for itself.

Highest percentage of outsourcing.

Most pensions in financial trouble.

Didnt support the BCTGM at Hostess.

Oversight by the government for mafia ties and corruption.

I know of one IBT pension in bad shape and it is all over the news. Where is the proof for your statement over 50% of IBT pensions are in financial trouble?

And you know perfectly well and won't admit that the only reason the IAM isn't in serious financial health is because they reduced future benefits with a 40% on Schedule B.
 
700-
Why do you criticize the IBT for not supporting the bakers at hostess, but defend the IAM for not supporting AMFA at NWA?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
AMFA sent a letter to NW telling them to take more from the IAM, and I only stated that contractually the work was the IAM's at the outstations where mtc wasnt staffed, and then with the imposition of the AMFA cba, they took R&D away from the maintenance, at the hubs, ramp had always parked and mtc pushed.

I dont agree with what Bobby DePace did, they should have not done the pushbacks, but contractually it was IAM work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
An injury to one is an injury to all. And the IAM as well as the other unions on the property injured us all. And the teamsters crossing the line to fly on NWA.
 
I dont agree with the stand that 143 took.

But the flight attendants who were represented by the PFAA which was a sister union of AMFA, and they even crossed the picket line. IBT represented Champion Air pilots flew replacement flights for NW.

The language in the IAM CBA was for R&D, Fleet did it at more stations than mtc, at NW ramp parked Mechanics pushed.

When NW imposed the CBA on AMFA, they took out all R&D language.

AMFA send Roach a letter asking for support, Roach replied with conditions and AMFA never responded back.

I will post the letter if I can find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

You made the statement "Most pensions in financial trouble." implying 50% +1 or more of IBT's pensions are in financial trouble,

I asked for proof. Your links do not support your statement. You need to provide links to the total IBT pensions and the facts to support your claims how many and which ones are in financial trouble. Facts = links to financial statements , official reports and disclosures. etc A google search and articles from TDU do not support your contention

Don't let the facts get in your way.
 
I dont agree with the stand that 143 took.

But the flight attendants who were represented by the PFAA which was a sister union of AMFA, and they even crossed the picket line. IBT represented Champion Air pilots flew replacement flights for NW.

The language in the IAM CBA was for R&D, Fleet did it at more stations than mtc, at NW ramp parked Mechanics pushed.

When NW imposed the CBA on AMFA, they took out all R&D language.

AMFA send Roach a letter asking for support, Roach replied with conditions and AMFA never responded back.

I will post the letter if I can find it.

That's why I said all unions on the property. Not just the IAM, but they are included.
 
Thanks Kevin.

Do you have the letter that AMFA sent to NW asking NW to take more from the other unions and not AMFA?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person