City of Dallas tells Delta it can no longer fly out of Love Field
- Thread starter Kev3188
- Start date
- Status
robbedagain
Veteran
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
this is where I start signing WN's petition to be able to operate int'l flights from DAL.
Just like I signed their petition to build an int'l terminal at HOU.
Just like I signed their petition to build an int'l terminal at HOU.
Comprehension DA, comprehension. Get a clue. Re-read what you posted and then what I posted. You still and continue to look like a moron, idiot, dumb-ass, however you want to form it. SWA and AA had NOTHING to do with the DOJ's rules and regulations on the divestures of the gates at DAL LF. PERIOD...WorldTraveler said:
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
you and your ignorance of what actually took place are an absolute embarrassment. Your statements are so far from reality you would have to be on drugs to have made them.
AA/US pleaded with the DOT and DOJ to prohibit any legacy carriers from receiving the divested slots.
WN went running to the government asking for them to get the gates and arguing why DL shouldn't get them, despite the fact that WN already and still controls 80% of the gates at DAL.
You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to not understand how much both AA and WN have worked to protect the duopoly (that's two companies carving up a market) in N. Texas
DL's best reward will come in knowing that the US airline system is NOT made of on protected markets and where they aren't blocked by ridiculous protectionistic laws, DL can and will win against AA and WN every time.... just like they have been doing.
robbedagain
Veteran
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
what SWAMT claims means absolutely nothing because it is simply a lie.
His own company argued for changing the WA to give WN access to the entire US, argued for access to the 2 gates even after they had locked up 16 out of 20 gates, and argued against any other legacy carriers being in DAL.
the reason why you are as ignorant on so many subjects is because you choose to listen to the people who make you feel good but don't know a clue about what they are talking about.
For you or he to say that AA and WN didn't do all they could to limit access to DAL to any real competition is nothing but the stuff of Puff the Magic Dragon.
Enjoy the trip but you will come back to earth and reality - and it will be hard.
His own company argued for changing the WA to give WN access to the entire US, argued for access to the 2 gates even after they had locked up 16 out of 20 gates, and argued against any other legacy carriers being in DAL.
the reason why you are as ignorant on so many subjects is because you choose to listen to the people who make you feel good but don't know a clue about what they are talking about.
For you or he to say that AA and WN didn't do all they could to limit access to DAL to any real competition is nothing but the stuff of Puff the Magic Dragon.
Enjoy the trip but you will come back to earth and reality - and it will be hard.
OP
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
except that AA not only got the JV with AA that was part of the deal to provide access to HND for US carriers but got one of the 4 slots to HND and gave up on it after trying to switch it to LAX even when they operated it.
Not only did AA operate JFK-HND at enormous losses but they also had periods when they did not operate it on a continuous basis.
Somehow, AA is senile at what it did in HND when it did have the right to serve it and dismissive of the fact that its LAX-NRT flight is one of the lowest revenue flights from the west coast to Asia among ALL carriers.
also doesn't change that DOT rules say that a route becomes dormant if it isn't serve for 90 days.
DL won't do that. AA has no chance of gaining access to the route.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
