Kev3188 said:Maybe instead of dodging paying taxes in the U.S., they could advocate for a fair rate. Maybe join a lobbying group?
Kev3188 said:How easy (or rather, easier) would/will it be for DL to outsource international flying for F/As?
All well and good, but that's an answer to a question I didn't ask. I wasn't asking if it would happen, I was asking if this could make it easier... Do you know?BABABOOY said:
yes, because in the 75 years of having Delta Flight Attendants, Delta has a history of outsourcing intl flight attendants and pissing off their workers....
and since we acquired NW, Delta has been cleaning up their mess of OUTSOURCING F/A's and been INSOURCING MORE jobs.
And, don't forget, when you move the flying to a foreign subsidiary based in another country, that country has its own labor laws that might require hiring its citizens. Why do you think AA has a flight attendant base in Bogota, Colombia staffed entirely with citizens of Colombia? And, we had to do that just to be awarded the right to fly to Colombia. (Well, actually it was Eastern or Pan Am, but we had to agree to maintain the base when AA went to the yard sale of the original airline.)BABABOOY said:
yes, because in the 75 years of having Delta Flight Attendants, Delta has a history of outsourcing intl flight attendants and pissing off their workers....
and since we acquired NW, Delta has been cleaning up their mess of OUTSOURCING F/A's and been INSOURCING MORE jobs.
Kevin, one of the major advantages of moving to foreign subsidiaries is the argument,,,"Our hands were tied. The <fill in the blank with the name of the country> labor laws required that their citizens get the jobs."Kev3188 said:All well and good, but that's an answer to a question I didn't ask. I wasn't asking if it would happen, I was asking if this could make it easier... Do you know?
jimntx said:(Well, actually it was Eastern or Pan Am, but we had to agree to maintain the base when AA went to the yard sale of the original airline.)
As profitable as DL is, I just don't their creating an offshore subsidiary would be very high on the IRS's radar.robbedagain said:Id be willing to bet the IRS would not be too terribly happy!!