First you say this...
WorldTraveler said:
nope. I never said anything about what might be in his personnel file.
And then you say this, which again, insinuates that there's a smoking gun in the P-file...
WorldTraveler said:
nope. You are a disciple of union propaganda and can't understand that when there is a personnel file, there is more to the story than what is known in the situation.
Followed by contradiction within two lines of each other?..
WorldTraveler said:
never have I said there is anything negative in it.
I have consistently said - which you cannot grasp - is that there is more to the story and it includes what is in the P file.
Again, you haven't said there is anything negative in it. But, if there wasn't anything negative, then why did you even bring it up?
Are you trying to say if there was something positive in it, they wouldn't have taken any action?
Or are you saying that they'd built up a case over time, and that's why he was fired?
Please, do tell us why you keep mentioning the P-file? There's either something in there to support DL's actions, or there isn't.
I know you don't have any clue as to what's in there, but you're the one who brought it up, insinuating his past performance as an issue
Perhaps it's time to man-up and realize that you only brought it up to look like Mr. Burns, cackling at the idea that DL could fire someone "just because it's Tuesday and I feel like it..."