Fire Holder !

[southwind]

"In the end, Holder was the best witness against his continuing in office. His insistence that he did nothing was a telling moment. The attorney general has done little in his tenure to protect civil liberties or the free press. Rather, Holder has supervised a comprehensive erosion of privacy rights, press freedom and due process. This ignoble legacy was made possible by Democrats who would look at their shoes whenever the Obama administration was accused of constitutional abuses."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/05/28/fire-eric-holder-column/2367713/

Apparently the liberal media is not as enamored with the current administration, as they once were !

And once Holder is canned, who's gonna provide cover for BaRack ?

 

[Dog Wonder]

who's gonna provide cover for BaRack ?

The voters.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Jonathan Turley is a respected professor and thinker.

He makes some valid and thought provoking points on his USA Today piece.

I believe Holder will go eventually. However, most likely he will not go until after the press leak investigations have ended.

On another note:

"Sources: News Corp long aware of Fox News subpoenas
Posted by
CNN Crime and Justice Correspondent Joe Johns
Updated Monday 5/27 3:00 a.m. ET

(CNN)– The parent company of Fox News was aware years ago that the Justice Department was targeting one of its reporters in a leak investigation, sources said.

One law enforcement source said the Justice Department notified a media organization three years ago of a subpoena for detailed telephone records, and a second told CNN that organization was Fox News.

After that news broke, a Fox News executive said the Justice Department notified Fox's parent company News Corporation of the subpoena in May 2010. But Fox News itself apparently never got the word.

The subpoena came as the Justice Department was investigating Stephen Kim, a former State Department worker accused of the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information to James Rosen, a Fox News reporter.

It is standard procedure for Justice Department officials to notify news organizations when they subpoena an outlet or its reporters.

CNN and other media outlets have previously reported a separate Justice Department query into Rosen's e-mails. With the approval of Attorney General Eric Holder, Justice officials obtained a warrant from a federal judge to access Rosen's e-mails.

While Fox News is now acknowledging that the Justice Department notified its parent company about the phone records search, that notice apparently did not include anything about the separate search of Rosen's e-mail.

"In the investigation that led to the indictment of Stephen Kim, the government issued subpoenas for toll records for five phone numbers associated with the media," a law enforcement source told CNN. "Consistent with Department of Justice policies and procedures, the government provided notification of those subpoenas nearly three years ago by certified mail, facsimile and e-mail."

News Corporation spokesman Nathaniel Brown responded Sunday night in a carefully worded statement.

“While we don't take issue with the DOJ's account that they sent a notice to News Corp, we do not have a record of ever having received it,” Brown said. “We are looking into this matter.”

 

[delldude]

Three judges to get a warrant......

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

"a Fox News executive said the Justice Department notified Fox's parent company News Corporation of the subpoena in May 2010."

Oh the outrage.

 

[delldude]

"a Fox News executive said the Justice Department notified Fox's parent company News Corporation of the subpoena in May 2010."

Oh the outrage.

Judge shopping......BS

 

[delldude]

"a Fox News executive said the Justice Department notified Fox's parent company News Corporation of the subpoena in May 2010."

Oh the outrage.

If it was CBS and NYT you'd be freaking.....

 

[southwind]

The voters.

Didn't know voters could stop an impeachment!

 

[Dog Wonder]

Judge shopping......BS

Rush can give tips on doctor shopping.