IBT/UAL contract rejection, what does it mean to us at AA?

WeAAsles said:
No. The injustice is certainly not being done to you. You're just very greedy.

A fact that's up to you if you want to admit or not.
 
No greed at all, I just want what's due without interference from you and your corrupt union, that knows nothing about what I do and knows nothing about what I have done to get where I am. In fact YOU do nothing but minimize what I do and you think and wish that you could do what I do but in fact you lack the qualification and the education, so that leaves feeling envious about my career path. Which then leaves you as a union shill with nothing better to do but come on here and try to tell me and other airline mechanics how we should think.
 
The fact is your a union punk in the gig to get days off and shift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
DallasConehead said:
No greed at all, I just want what's due without interference from you and your corrupt union, that knows nothing about what I do and knows nothing about what I have done to get where I am. In fact YOU do nothing but minimize what I do and you think and wish that you could do what I do but in fact you lack the qualification and the education, so that leaves feeling envious about my career path. Which then leaves you as a union shill with nothing better to do but come on here and try to tell me and other airline mechanics how we should think.
 
The fact is your a union punk in the gig to get days off and shift.
Sorry, no dice. You're greedy. Compared to your counterparts in JFK, ORD, BOS, LAX, SAN, SFO and MIA

You're overpaid.

Sincerely:

"Union Punk"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
WeAAsles said:
Sorry, no dice. You're greedy. Compared to your counterparts in JFK, ORD, BOS, LAX, SAN, SFO and MIA

You're overpaid.

Sincerely:

"Union Punk"
 
Who's greedy? Here's some greed for ya! We got nothing on these guys!!

From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
 
The CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 20-to-1 in 1965 and 29.9-to-1 in 1978, grew to 122.6-to-1 in 1995, peaked at 383.4-to-1 in 2000, and was 295.9-to-1 in 2013, far higher than it was in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s.
 
So, weez, what do you think our CEO should be paid?
 
Is he overpaid? Greedy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Rogallo said:
Who's greedy? Here's some greed for ya! We got nothing on these guys!!
From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
 
The CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 20-to-1 in 1965 and 29.9-to-1 in 1978, grew to 122.6-to-1 in 1995, peaked at 383.4-to-1 in 2000, and was 295.9-to-1 in 2013, far higher than it was in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s.
 
So, weez, what do you think our CEO should be paid?
 
Is he overpaid? Greedy?
Rogalo you're diverting the subject. Of course they're extremely greedy. But so is the guy I was just talking about. I'm greedy too. Not denying it though.

BTW where do you work?
 
WeAAsles said:
Rogalo you're diverting the subject. Of course they're extremely greedy. But so is the guy I was just talking about. I'm greedy too. Not denying it though.

BTW where do you work?
 
[SIZE=10.5pt]What does it matter where he works? Your intent is to spin the subject from the one which is your reason for being here is your vain attempt to make us believe you know what’s best. Shill…[/SIZE]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
WeAAsles said:
Rogalo you're diverting the subject. Of course they're extremely greedy. But so is the guy I was just talking about. I'm greedy too. Not denying it though.
BTW where do you work?
what dose it matter where some one is located at. You can't be serious. Your really trying to spin the twu lack of skills in branging back industry leading contracts. You keep talking about especially on delta threads you have a employment contract . With the twu that's about as good as a piece of toilet paper . As we have seen the twu can quickly take away our pay . Layoffs can happen in a instant so what good is your contract. I'm glad your not on the nc as you would have pay base on where someone lives. That is plain wrong.your spinning the twu low industry pay scales. And Blameing where someone lives. A typical twu supporter a typical twu comment. The people in Mia should get you thrown out as a shop steward and you should never be allowed in any twu/association office. For several reasons. Calling a member greedy and you have no respect because they are at DFW. I'm glad you lost your election. The members in MIA. Are better off not having you represent them. You are a disgrace to the members of the twu. Just because someone wants a pay raise especially when that group is under 10 bucks a hour . Plus benefits lost holidays lost sick time two weeks of vacation .were not greedy were overdue for a pay raise. We're tired of giving back .its time we were giving increases . You need to go into management they love the way you thank
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
conehead777 said:
what dose it matter where some one is located at. You can't be serious. Your really trying to spin the twu lack of skills in branging back industry leading contracts. You keep talking about especially on delta threads you have a employment contract . With the twu that's about as good as a piece of toilet paper . As we have seen the twu can quickly take away our pay . Layoffs can happen in a instant so what good is your contract. I'm glad your not on the nc as you would have pay base on where someone lives. That is plain wrong.your spinning the twu low industry pay scales. And Blameing where someone lives. A typical twu supporter a typical twu comment. The people in Mia should get you thrown out as a shop steward and you should never be allowed in any twu/association office. For several reasons. Calling a member greedy and you have no respect because they are at DFW. I'm glad you lost your election. The members in MIA. Are better off not having you represent them. You are a disgrace to the members of the twu. Just because someone wants a pay raise especially when that group is under 10 bucks a hour . Plus benefits lost holidays lost sick time two weeks of vacation .were not greedy were overdue for a pay raise. We're tired of giving back .its time we were giving increases . You need to go into management they love the way you thank
What a diatribe. Again I didn't say that the members are greedy. I said YOU were. You really keep trying to pin me to having an opinion about "everyone" when I'm just talking about YOU.

Again YOU'RE greedy. Why is it so hard for you to admit it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
DallasConehead said:
What does it matter where he works? Your intent is to spin the subject from the one which is your reason for being here is your vain attempt to make us believe you know what’s best. Shill…[/size]
What's best for who? Who are you talking about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
700UW said:
And here you go folks, people like bob (I got mine) is why no one will get theirs.
 
You have no idea about being a union member, you are just a member of a union.
 
Strength in numbers, and its obvious you have no idea and dont read the updates, your beloved Doug came to Fleet and wants Cargo outsourced.
 
And you the eight year guy will be one of the first out the door.
What update? Even so, if I were to see an update stating that, sorry, it still won't affect me in the least.
 
bob@las-AA said:
What update? Even so, if I were to see an update stating that, sorry, it still won't affect me in the least.
Sure it wont, just ask the former HP rampers about voting for the money in a JCBA, and then US closed 20 stations.
 
Dont be an ostrich, updates are put out weekly, and your own fleet committee put it out how the company wants concessions, but hey, you dont care, you just want money.
 
And if small stations close, cargo and catering gone, you will be gone.
 
But as long as you get yours right?
 
Dont worry about anyone else right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
IMG_0470.PNG
 
700 You just love to argue your onion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
700UW said:
Sure it wont, just ask the former HP rampers about voting for the money in a JCBA, and then US closed 20 stations.
 
Dont be an ostrich, updates are put out weekly, and your own fleet committee put it out how the company wants concessions, but hey, you dont care, you just want money.
 
And if small stations close, cargo and catering gone, you will be gone.
 
But as long as you get yours right?
 
Dont worry about anyone else right?
it doesn't matter 700 we gave up money for no layoffs but guess what the company still layed off. So go for the money if you get layed off witch they will do any way you come back to better pay and benefits. Your a typical socialist. The bread cost the same for everybody. I'm never buying into that pay cuts for jobs ever again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
conehead777 said:
it doesn't matter 700 we gave up money for no layoffs but guess what the company still layed off. So go for the money if you get layed off witch they will do any way you come back to better pay and benefits. Your a typical socialist. The bread cost the same for everybody. I'm never buying into that pay cuts for jobs ever again.
Actually I think I already established that it's YOU who's the socialist. You and Big D Conehead.

Let me ask you something. Say Doug decides to become suddenly generous and offers you $51.00 per hour. Are you willing to take $50.00 so your BROTHERS in JFK can get $52.00 to make their lives a little easier?

The question goes out to Big D or anyone else outside of expensive cities.
 
bob@las-AA said:
What update? Even so, if I were to see an update stating that, sorry, it still won't affect me in the least.
If me Mr 21 year man (May) decided to let the company have Freight and say Bagroom you would probably wind up on the street for at least the next 5 years.

You're so low on that totem pole that even the loss of encoders would probably hit you Junior.
 
WeAAsles said:
Actually I think I already established that it's YOU who's the socialist. You and Big D Conehead.
Let me ask you something. Say Doug decides to become suddenly generous and offers you $51.00 per hour. Are you willing to take $50.00 so your BROTHERS in JFK can get $52.00 to make their lives a little easier?
The question goes out to Big D or anyone else outside of expensive cities.
Of course that's a no brainer to this Tulsa boy
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Latest posts