Some people think the DOJ was wrong to approve AA.
The DOJ thought they were right and approved it anyway.
Some people think the DOJ would be wrong to approve a WN merger.
It would only matter what the DOJ thinks on that one too.
If a person relies on a certain set of facts to determine if a merger should be done, and the DOJ uses the same or a different set of facts to determine if it should be done and approves it anyway,
Who is really wrong?
If a person believes that Delta should not be able to trespass on WN leased gates due to the WARA, but a judge or the government lets it continue anyway, was the person wrong?
Wow, I am even starting to reason like WT.
Ok, E's credibility is still intact but on this subject unproven.
Mine may be alittle shaky though.