OP
More MEM cuts
- Thread starter Kev3188
- Start date
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
direct your advice to E who has wanted to try to argue with select facts that aren't logically connected why DL was incapable of making an accurate decision about the MEM market.
If you want to include labor in the discussion, then you shouldn't be surprised if I choose to take it down paths that are equally as off the beaten path.
If you want to include labor in the discussion, then you shouldn't be surprised if I choose to take it down paths that are equally as off the beaten path.
OP
- Thread Starter
- #273
More deflection. Awesome.WorldTraveler said:
Actually, labor is part of this topic. I'm the OP, I should know. Go back and look at the first post if need be.
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
of course it is all deflection if it doesn't fit your definition of the topic.
Would you like to provide an outline of what areas related to the discussion that are open for discussion and what are out of bounds, Kevin?
E's discussion about DL's history in the S. Central US is related... he just fails to make any logical connection with his argument that DL wasn't capable of knowing that MEM wasn't viable as a hub.
But again, you go ask E what that has to do with the discussion íf you don't want to hear it because I didn't go down the path.
If he wants to go there, who are you to say he can't?
I simply will grill him on the basis of the logic he attempts to use.
Would you like to provide an outline of what areas related to the discussion that are open for discussion and what are out of bounds, Kevin?
E's discussion about DL's history in the S. Central US is related... he just fails to make any logical connection with his argument that DL wasn't capable of knowing that MEM wasn't viable as a hub.
But again, you go ask E what that has to do with the discussion íf you don't want to hear it because I didn't go down the path.
If he wants to go there, who are you to say he can't?
I simply will grill him on the basis of the logic he attempts to use.
OP
- Thread Starter
- #275
My "definition" of a topic is usually pretty broad, since I enjoy the twists & turns most seem to take. .WorldTraveler said:
That said, it'd be nice if for once you didn't completely co-opt one to use as a urinal.
OP
- Thread Starter
- #276
Kinda like the logic that correlated a founding in MLU with MEM?WorldTraveler said:
Kinda like the logic that insists on dragging AA into the mix, not because it makes sense w/r/t the discussion, but because it's E's alma mater?
How 'bout the 787?
Pass the charcoal.
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
OP
- Thread Starter
- #282
Not much, but it still found it's way into the thread.WorldTraveler said:
You tell us.
Lol. Indeed.eolesen said:
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
perhaps you can help show me where I mentioned the 787. I don't recall bringing it into the conversation.
I certainly don't want you getting all defensive and expecting an apology if I am wrong but this is the first place where I see reference to the 787.
I certainly don't want you getting all defensive and expecting an apology if I am wrong but this is the first place where I see reference to the 787.
did I miss some other reference to the 787?
Force Majeure
Advanced
- Sep 21, 2013
- 114
- 212
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,721
thank you, Force.
My reference to the 787 and general fleet discussions was in response to this statement
But then the thread is full of all kinds of other comments from other people about topics that have nothing to do with MEM so I'm not sure what the point of anyone's comments or the question about the 787.
More significantly, it changes nothing about the fact that DL had the right to pull down MEM just as it does with other cities on its network. DL equally has the right and clearly the market knowledge to be able to add to or remove service as it sees fit.
My reference to the 787 and general fleet discussions was in response to this statement
the same poster made several other comments about fleet age which seemed to be related to general discussions about DL's strategies vs. others.
But then the thread is full of all kinds of other comments from other people about topics that have nothing to do with MEM so I'm not sure what the point of anyone's comments or the question about the 787.
More significantly, it changes nothing about the fact that DL had the right to pull down MEM just as it does with other cities on its network. DL equally has the right and clearly the market knowledge to be able to add to or remove service as it sees fit.
Similar threads
