Insp4
Veteran
- May 27, 2016
- 6,084
- 906
"Oh, she can be bought! She's a regular"W%&^*" Although an expensive one! The Russians bought her for $145 million that went to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for 20% of our uranium!
Mueller issues subpoena for Trumps Deutsche Bank records/Russia ?
- Thread starter NewHampshire Black Bears
- Start date
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
Keep up the #fake news with the uranium.
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Why do you keep up the false information?
“
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve
Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.”
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Why do you keep up the false information?
“
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve
Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.
All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.”
delldude
Veteran
You must have overlooked the $145 million in donations to the Crinton Foundation from the Rusky investors into Uranium One.....you know, the $145 million Hillary neglected to disclose until someone snooping found it.
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
Read the truth.
You right wingers are seriously blind and have zero comprehension skills.
It’s so sad.
You right wingers are seriously blind and have zero comprehension skills.
It’s so sad.
delldude
Veteran
All this coming from a corrupt administration which is already revealing criminal activity from on going Intel committees investigations of Obama FBI and DOJ.
All these donations were done between 2006 and 2010, some when HRC was sitting SOS......it wasn't until an investigative journalist questioned these contributions to the Crinton Foundation, that they were then disclosed, five years after the fact in April 2015. If it wasn't for an investigative journalist, the money would never had been reported.
Insp4
Veteran
- May 27, 2016
- 6,084
- 906
"According to the New York Times"?...... .Ha!......HA! HA! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...Right!!!
Insp4
Veteran
- May 27, 2016
- 6,084
- 906
check this on snopes. At the time The committee was under the impression that none of the uranium was to be exported. Today, we know that was not true. If they had known, maybe one of the nine would have turned it down. But from what I understand, Obama could still have O.K. it and the deal would have gone through anyway. Which brings up another question, why he O.K ed. the deal in the first place? And did he know it could be exported?
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
delldude
Veteran
Then you should be able to explain, with the NRC rules in place for U1 not being able to export yellow cake from the US, how it was done via a third party interest through Canada and disappeared into undisclosed locations in Europe.
delldude
Veteran
Worth every penny of it, Dog. If that little girl from State hadn't muttered the fact that Hillary had all her work on a private server, none of what we know today, and are still learning, would never have seen the light of day.
What was it Trey said??
"What server?"
Ain't how ya run a democratic republic.
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Similar threads
