NEW AMERICAN HANGARS

700UW said:
Once again where is this hangar?
As I can get the parts allocation.
And any current AA mechanic can check the OTS aircraft to see if it's true.
Yes we can and we have guys that watch the list of heavies and mods.
 
1AA said:
Yes we can and we have guys that watch the list of heavies and mods.
So anything in Mexico?

And TopDawg could tell us if AA is using a DL hangar in Mexico.
 
700UW said:
DL has no Airframe capabilities in Mexico.
 
Only ATL and MSP.
 
http://www.deltatechops.com/about-us/view/category/facilities
 
And DL is showing no line maintenance capabilities in Mexico either.
 
http://www.deltatechops.com/mro-capabilities/view/category/service-locator
 
And no line checks capability anywhere in Mexico.
 
http://www.deltatechops.com/mro-capabilities/view/category/service-locator
 
I sent TopDawg a PM and asked him to comment here, as he is a DL Mechanic.
In post #10, you posted the link to the Delta TechOps/AeroMexico joint venture:

http://aeromexico.com/en/about-us/knowing-aeromexico/maintenance/?site=us

Dunno why the DL site does not list the facilities in Mexico, but the link above clearly shows the joint venture, where DL and AM have teamed up to challenge Aeroman in El Salvador as the largest MRO in Latin America. Called TechOps Mexico, they claim that it's the largest MRO in Latin America. Through this joint venture, DL has lots of facilities in Mexico providing comprehensive airframe and powerplant services.

http://aeromexico.com/en/about-us/knowing-aeromexico/maintenance/aeromexico-delta-mro-facility-queretaro/?site=us

http://www.deltatechops.com/news/view/grupo-aeromexico-and-delta-air-lines-to-build-joint-heavy-maintenance-facil
 
Runwaysticker said:
Ok the China hanger is BS they already have a MRO to cover the 777 work, if they hire AA INT workers in Mexico is it adding a  new AMTs, if so does it require a SEC or 10K filing , I know the FLT ATT based down south are AA employees working non union, when they got hired no SEC filing , also what if the title for the hangar is not in AAs name yet would that not show in the sec or 10k filing,  I seen the pictures talked to the MEXICAN guy I smell a  :rat
Your post is a bit incoherent.. but.... there's no need for a SEC filing if you're adding employees or expanding your international capabilities. They might file something if there's a press release, but that's entirely discretionary on the part of the company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I doubt they would ferry an airplane for a line b-check, big waste of money, as AA only flies RJs to Queretaro.
 
And the poster stated they were AA employees, not the MRO, so it still doesnt add up to what he is saying.
 
And a B-Check doesnt require the plane to be in the hangar.
 
DL doesnt have a hangar in MEX.
 
And I have someone checking on parts being sent or stocked at Mexico City and or Queretaro.
 
Wont get it till tomorrow, they are especially checking kits for letter checks.
 
And I just used Google Earth, there is no DL hangar nor any construction on a hangar showing.
 
It called delta tech ops a combined effort with aeromexico, do a google delta tech ops Mexico city
 
When was it updated check this out
 

Attachments

  • American.jpg
    American.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 238
  • American.jpg
    American.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 240
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The photos don't prove much. That sign is in the old pre-bankruptcy typeface. Some three years after changing logos, I'm pretty certain even screwed up AA would manage to have the right one on a sign at a new construction project....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
700UW said:
I doubt they would ferry an airplane for a line b-check, big waste of money, as AA only flies RJs to Queretaro.
 
And the poster stated they were AA employees, not the MRO, so it still doesnt add up to what he is saying.
 
And a B-Check doesnt require the plane to be in the hangar.
AA'S B Checks are required to be in a hangar. Slowly being converted to phase checks but still require a hangar. Different name same work load. What UsAir does or did is different from what we do here at AA.