olderguyAMT
Advanced
- Jun 12, 2010
- 238
- 41
I noted that the so-called Labor Protection Provision is in the TWU Scope proposal as well as the Company's.
Why is this language necessary? What caused the TWU to cave-in, to capitulate to the demands of mgmt? Some say that in OH that the Co. does not own the property or the buildings, so there is nothing to sell. If there is nothing to sell, then what is the exact reason for the language? As stated in both proposals, if the Co. decides to sell 20% or more of the maintenance facilities in ANY 12 month period, then the buyer would have to offer jobs per senority list. What would prevent the sale of Up To 19% every year? If less than 20% then No job offer per senority list? Sounds like a screwy situation. Bob please clarify!
Why is this language necessary? What caused the TWU to cave-in, to capitulate to the demands of mgmt? Some say that in OH that the Co. does not own the property or the buildings, so there is nothing to sell. If there is nothing to sell, then what is the exact reason for the language? As stated in both proposals, if the Co. decides to sell 20% or more of the maintenance facilities in ANY 12 month period, then the buyer would have to offer jobs per senority list. What would prevent the sale of Up To 19% every year? If less than 20% then No job offer per senority list? Sounds like a screwy situation. Bob please clarify!
