Josh,
I enjoy reading and debating Kev as well... he has an ability to keep on task w/ the conversation despite the noise around....
Eric,
It is perfectly acceptable to have a second ID... The issue is that you made a ROYAL charade over the fact that I was doing exactly what the board allowed - even though you had already done the exact same thing. That is flat out hypocrisy but it typifies exactly what our ongoing spat has been about.
You wanted to make a big deal about outing me in the interest of full disclosure despite the fact that you have been using a 2[sup]nd[/sup] ID for years so you could have a private persona – and I knew that. It is hypocritical for you to expect others to be fully open when you weren’t and aren’t.
Spare us your list of problems …. Your only problem is that can't resolve the problem on this board. You continue to use threats to out me which clearly haven't worked so far. Given that I could just as easily take this discussion off the board, you have as much or more to lose by carrying out your threats.
The common sense approach is to be honest or at least not accuse someone of the same things you are doing. You accuse me of deflection but the simple fact is that NO ONE ELSE on this forum works as hard to defend themselves while trashing someone else using the same techniques of which you accuse them.
Drop the revenge and learn how to admit you are wrong.....it will take you a long ways in life.
Nobody is asking you to divulge your PMs. I am asking you to have the integrity to reveal your own second ID since you have no problem outing other people’s private information and 2[sup]nd[/sup] IDs… we'll be waiting but won't hold our breath for too long.
If you’re not at AA anymore, then why do you need to maintain a 2[sup]nd[/sup] ID?
FWA,
Since using two IDs is permissible under the rules of this board and you are one of those serial red button pushers who uses the vast majority of your negative votes to vote against me, regardless of the subject, then let if be fully known that Spectator is indeed a sidekick who assists in countering your red button pushing….
Since it is perfectly obvious that the whole reason why the handful of you even care about the 2[sup]nd[/sup] ID is because it frustrates your ability to run down my reputation score – which you can then use to argue that you have more “reputation” than me…. And not surprisingly, the handful of you all vote for each comment each other makes against me while voting against my own comments highlights that the voting system is a complete farce and a popularity contest.
Bringing the reality of what is going on to the forefront particularly with respect to you and your alliance simply demonstrates why I use my 2[sup]nd[/sup] ID.
Speaking of reputation, I would like to ask if you have bailed on your conviction developed over years on this forum and others that AA will survive as an independent airline (you are referring to WHEN AA and US merge in your discussions regarding merged routes)?
DO you really believe that – and why did you spend so much time arguing the point of how strong AA was AGAINST ME when now I am the one who was right about that AA would end up in BK and I now argue that AA will survive as an independent airline while you apparently are bailing out.
Is it more important to you to win the favor of your fellow members on this board who largely are against AA mgmt than to stand up for what you believed to be the case for years – and which is still the most likely outcome?
Now to Kev,
No, there are no set rules for how the post voting system should be used... most things on the internet regarding social behavior are still evolving... so it is with this issue which is why I am shining the light on the topic and also forcing some people to come out in the open.
If 75% or more of someone's post votes are for or against one person, then there is every reason for the question to be asked what is going on, don't you think?
If someone doesn't even post but spends the majority of their votes for/against one person, then the question should be raised or the identities highlighted, don't you think?
-----
Now returning to the issues of government pensions – which is closely tied to the pension discussion here with DL.
You would like to paint WI as a state that has suffered under Walker… but the simple reality is that WI has above average income for the US and its average income looks even better relative to its cost of living. WI is a state with a healthy balanced economy – industrial/manufacturing, farming, services – that is strong because the voters of WI are adapting to the realities of the changing global economy and doing it as good or better than the US.
In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says that WI has experienced a statistically significant DECLINE in its unemployment rate over the past year – and has an unemployment rate that is ALREADY below average.
WI also shares in a general improvement in the economy in several states in the Midwest, including MN, IA, and NE.
http://www.missourieconomy.org/indicators/cost_of_living/index.stm
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/statemedian/
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm
WI residents have it good and they should be proud of what they have instead of trying to argue how bad off they are because someone with different values is leading the state.
The WI state budget is in fact in better shape than the budget in many states. Sadly many governments AND BUSINESES AND INDIVIDUALS are only servicing their debt.
WI voters realize that economic realities are changing and they aren’t willing to subsidize ideologies with their tax dollars if there isn’t economic value to do so. The simple fact is that union representation in the US has slipped so low and it is now so heavily concentrated in the public sector that it was a given that what Walker did would come to pass – because one group of citizens WERE receiving substantially better benefits than the average for American workers – and WI voters, like everyone else, are not willing to enrich someone else at their own expense.
Got data to show that non-farming small businesses in WI have suffered more than large corporations? And if you want to throw in farming, compare WI’s farming economy to other states and connect how WI is faring based on WI state policies.
It is precisely because WI’s economy is adapting but isn’t paying down debt why it is important to talk about DL’s efforts at debt reduction relative to its pension obligations, including buying as many used aircraft as possible to reduce debt for new aircraft is different not only from the industry but also from much of western society, including governments.
--
Finally, it is perfectly ok for you or anyone else to challenge me including what I say about DL or any other company. We all understand your loyalty for organized labor and for NW, but times change… I get that you don’t like someone pointing out the successes of a company that took away what you cherished…. But it would be nice if you would be willing to accept that I was right in saying that DL would integrate NW as well as it has done and with a far better track record than most mergers in the industry; that it would not disproportionately target NW people, hubs or routes anymore than it has PMDL (which has also shrunk) in corporate downsizing efforts and the typical merger consolidation process which meant that many MSP functions and jobs would move to ATL (that is why MN had the loan with NW in place and why DL chose to pay it off early); that DL would succeed in its labor integration strategies and do it based on the support of a majority of the combined workforce; and that DL would build on the strengths of the merger to become one of the financially strongest and largest airlines in the US and the world.
That reality is nothing personal between me and you – it’s just that I’ve followed DL and the airline industry for decades and know what makes each airline work and what doesn’t… and also know how DL has been able to overcome industry challenges which have caused their competitors to stumble – and why DL is now capitalizing on its own strengths which are coincidentally some of its competitors’ weaknesses.
That is not blind optimism… it is an honest assessment – and it becomes more apparent each and every day as DL implements strategies that put more and more distance between DL and its competitors.
And the more people try to argue my bias and discredit my reputation, the more apparent it becomes who has the bias and who is unable to speak with accuracy about what is going on in the airline industry.