SOUTHWEST & AMERICAN MERGER?

swamt

Veteran
Oct 23, 2010
12,478
4,835
Notice how Horton mentions Southwest as a merger canidate for the very first time. This did not come from the media as a potential merger partner, it came from Horton. Interesting huh?? Here's the article below:

Home>Collections>American Airlines

American Airlines is single and looking


Analysis: Evaluating AMR’s options in M&A

July 18, 2012|Arti Patel, MarketWatch

    • Share
      check-small.png
    • Email
      check-small.png
    • Print




SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — When American Airlines, the third-largest U.S. carrier, announced last week that it would seriously entertain the idea of a corporate merger, Chief Executive Tom Horton identified a short list of potential partners.
US Airways Group Inc.(US:LCC), JetBlue Airways Corp. (US:JBLU) and Alaska Air Group (US:ALK) are favored options, with Republic Airways’ Frontier Airlines (US:RJET), Virgin America and Southwest Airlines Co. (US:LUV) as other possible contenders.
Of the six, US Airways is the front-runner.
“For many years, I have publicly been a proponent of consolidation as one path to a healthier U.S. airline industry,” Horton wrote in a letter to employees on July 10. “We have assessed many possible combinations in the past, including, of course, an acquisition of US Airways.”
American’s parent company AMR Corp. (US:AAMRQ) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November 2011 and has until Dec. 28 to file a plan for reorganization with a federal court.
pixel.gif


Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways, the country’s fifth largest carrier, is the only other large-scale independent airline left. It has shown interest in a merger with American in the past.
US Airways‘ hubs in Charlotte, N.C., Philadelphia, Phoenix and Washington, D.C. would help expand routes for American, which retains hubs in Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles Miami and New York.
Analysts have been anticipating the merger between the two for some time. A consolidation would help both airlines better compete against the country’s two biggest carriers, United Continental Holdings Inc. (US:UAL) and Delta Air Lines Inc. (US:DAL) Both United and Delta are the product of megamergers themselves. See a slide show of buyouts and busts in the U.S. airline industry.
On Wednesday, AMR reported a loss of $241 million for its second quarter, down from $286 million in the same period a year ago. Revenue was up 5.5% to $6.5 billion from $6.1 billion, the highest in company history.
“Our revenue performance has topped the industry for several months, leading to our first second-quarter profit in five years excluding reorganization and special items,” Horton said in a statement, referring to $95 million in net income once one-time items and restructuring costs were taken out.Matchmaking
The long-discussed deal with US Airways is by far American’s best option. The second best option, on paper, would be for American to merge with Southwest, the No. 4 U.S. airline.
Southwest has been dealing with issues of its own in recent months after its latest acquisition, with AirTran Holdings, earlier this year. The company is facing some rather large technological challenges and is currently working off an outdated system for recording passenger reservations.
 
It doesn't look like there is a quote from Horton saying this. Just looks like the writers opinion....which doesn't mean much.
 
I thought it odd that WN wasn't mentioned in the initial 5 that AA came out with, since they make far more sense than some on that list. Perhaps it was an intentional omission? Makes for some interesting situations, since WN is mostly a point to point. It would create a presence in DEN and ATL. I'm not sure about their East coast strengths, but a lot could change in 1-2 years.
 
I think that jersey777 is completely correct. This is the first mention of WN, and it's not a quote from Horton. Had he actually said "Southwest," it wouid have been picked up in dozens (no, hundreds) of news stories.

Besides, Horton likely isn't actually interested in merging with any of them - but now AA can tell the creditors and the court that "AA explored all possible options and decided that going alone made more sense."
 
What I find funny is there are those here who say AA needs to merge to survive. It's not like AA is a domestic only regional carrier with no real network.
They make it sound like AA will liquidate unless merged...What about Jetblue? Southwest? USair?
Are their networks that good, they themselves do not need to merge in order to survive.

Once AA gets the contract IT wants, it will be profitable regardless. These are the same naysayers who say AA did NOT need to file CH.11 because of nearly $5 billion on hand.

Which one is it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
For the past 12+ years, both jetBlue and WN grew exponentially at the expense of AA and the other legacies. Both of them grabbed millions of domestic (and, in the case of B6, some international) passengers, making it difficult for AA to continue to serve places like ALB, SYR and BUF and many other domestic cities. In the old days, BUF saw AA 707s and 727s and was an important part of the AA network.

Those airlines grew because they had very low costs. Low costs made it easy to flood the market with new capacity at low fares and grab lots of business.

Now, finally, AA has made the difficult step of using Ch 11 to lower its costs, and once that is complete, AA should be in a position to add new capacity and attempt to regain some of those lost customers. Costs at WN have grown substantially and it is in danger of becoming a high-cost airline. At B6, as it has aged, its costs have increased as well, with its pilots making more money than US East A320 and E190 pilots.

Does AA need US to comptete? Some think so - but US brings very little at NYC and nothing in CHI. Very little on the west coast (SEA, SFO, LAX, SAN). Nothing to Asia and almost nothing to South America. Several open skies European destinations from PHL and CLT. Yawn.

AA and US will probably combine, but IMO, AA doesn't need US anywhere near as much as US needs AA.
 
After AA gets the contracts it wants and everything else negotiated down to a more manageable level,
the industry may soon refer to AA as a major low cost carrier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
After AA gets the contracts it wants and everything else negotiated down to a more manageable level, the industry may soon refer to AA as a major low cost carrier.

A hub/spoke carrier with extensive long-haul international service nearly by definition can't be a low cost carrier in the sense that a primarily point2point domestic carrier can. The hub/spoke global carrier model just has too many extra costs over point2point primarily domestic model. AA may become one of the lower cost, if not lowest cost, network carriers.

Jim
 
A hub/spoke carrier with extensive long-haul international service nearly by definition can't be a low cost carrier in the sense that a primarily point2point domestic carrier can. The hub/spoke global carrier model just has too many extra costs over point2point primarily domestic model. AA may become one of the lower cost, if not lowest cost, network carriers.

Jim

So much for tongue in cheek sarcasm.
 
AA and US will probably combine, but IMO, AA doesn't need US anywhere near as much as US needs AA.
AA could probably putt-putt around as a distant number 3 for years, waving bye-bye to the FFers and corporate accounts that DL and UA steal away. But if AA wants to be a player again, they need US. If US employees want long-term stability, they need AA. Who needs who more? Not an important question, seems to be just for bragging rights, much like the "who bought who?" that US east and west still argue over, so I'll keep my opinion to myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
  • duh! its part of the cornerstone plan! if you can't beat em' drag em' down to your level by merging with em'!
 
Dear God, please don't ruin WN with AA "corporate culture".

WN is doing just fine, and will be a stand alone profitable airline for decades to come.

AMR2 has nothing but problems on their side of the ledger. Corrupt management and unions have bought a great company down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person