The Gun Control Issue:

[keeptheodds]

If you are a Christian and believe that this country needs a more Christian leader, then you should have abstained from voting for either candidate. The one they voted for is a serial adulterer, which according to that dang old Leviticus, should be subjected to the same punishment as two men who engage in sex.

That'st the funny thing about them. Their rise came about in 1980. They supported Reagan over the president who has lived the most "Christ like" life in our nations history. They want Christian values....they just want tax cuts more.

Trump got my vote because he’s not a politician. He was a wrenchbtobbe thrown into some very corrupt gears. That he has done. The establishment, Democrat and Republican was blown away by his win. Now watching the two parties scramble for damage control is a bit comical to me. Thus far I’m extremely happy with the out come of him being president. I think the vast majority of the people that voted for him are happy with the results. The problem
with Republican voters is that they have no one to vote for. Most Republican politicians are rollover piecesofshit and democrats are just dumbasses. So what is one to do? As for the religion aspect I left the church years ago and have been separating my self from the “Christian” moniker. I don’t put a whole lot of stock in it anymore. My dog tags say “Protestant” so that’s what I go with. I voted for a man that I thought was the best thing for this country. There wasn’t a single person lined up on that stage other than him that could have beaten Hillary which is the worst person in the country to have become president. So relax in knowing that the best person that we had available to us is now
President.

 

[delldude]

This last election, nearly 100% of the Christian evangelical voters voted for the most immoral president this country has ever seen. Mostly because of his unclear stance on abortion. If we want Christian values in our government, do we really want a 4 (at least) time adulterer, a man who would grab women by the puzzy, a man who only sees the inside of a church when it's raining too hard to golf, then how could they cast their vote for Donald T Rump without being...what's that word...oh yes...hypocritical.

An immoral person the product of the era and time we live in....is it really His fault?

If you are a Christian and believe that this country needs a more Christian leader, then you should have abstained from voting for either candidate. The one they voted for is a serial adulterer, which according to that dang old Leviticus, should be subjected to the same punishment as two men who engage in sex.

That'st the funny thing about them. Their rise came about in 1980. They supported Reagan over the president who has lived the most "Christ like" life in our nations history. They want Christian values....they just want tax cuts more.

They voted to support their own agenda...isn't that what elections are all about?
Leviticus.....isn't that the guy the left assassinated during the sixties?
Was it those vile Christian bastards who, during the dem convention, voted to have God removed from the democrat platform only to be overridden by the chair?

 

[delldude]

Because nothing is perfect. Since Columbine, the ban was dropped. Instead of being safer, kids and concert goers are getting shot up in record numbers. I thought freedom to own guns meant we'd be safer.

But tell me.....how would any of the guns used in any of the school and concert shootings protect you from a tyrannical government?

You should look into the refugee issue in Britain and Europe. All these poor, destitute beings who don't own firearms are committing atrocious attacks in a very deadly and efficient manner, with knives.

 

[KCFlyer]

They would be used to shoot back.

At a tank. They often say, never bring a knife to a gunfight. They also should say, never bring a gun to a tank fight

 

[KCFlyer]

An immoral person the product of the era and time we live in....is it really His fault?

Hmmm...a guy like Trump represents the results of the era and the times we live in. And he's an immoral person.

Trump ran to "Make America Great Again". Does that mean that he wants to take us back to a time when we all can be raised to grab puzzies and cheat on our wives? Is that when America was considered "Great"? The only time Trump willing went into a church was when he heard that there would be a laying on of hands. He was sadly disappointed to find that he couldn't lay any hands on puzzies.

They voted to support their own agenda...isn't that what elections are all about?

Back in 1980 they wanted to bring Christian values in government. They had a guy who taught Sunday School as one candidate. A candidate who confessed that he was human and had "lust in his heart" at a point in his marriage. A man where God play a large role in his life. But he didn't get their vote.

Fast Forward to 2016. I have friends who post on Facebook. They were torn in this election...they didn't like Hillary, but Trumps immorality concerned them. One person posted that the "godly man, Franklin Graham" endorsed Trump, so we should follow. Good little religious sheep...follow the leader. Franklin Graham and others on either side should have put their own agenda on the back burner. They call themselves "values voters", yet they were urged to vote for the man who lacks any shred of moral values. If their agenda was to vote for the candidate with high moral values, then they are hypocrites for voting for the candidate they eventually voted for. Frankie and others should have said that their flock should pray for guidance from God on what to do, but that they could not in good conscience recommend either.

Leviticus.....isn't that the guy the left assassinated during the sixties? Was it those vile Christian bastards who, during the dem convention, voted to have God removed from the democrat platform only to be overridden by the chair?

Wow...they were ahead of their time. God shouldn't play a role in government because there are different versions of God. If God is in government, then they should be open to all Gods...the Muslim God. The Hindu God. The Buddhist God. The Indian Great Spirit. We've seen what God in government does. Google "Sharia Law". We want God in government...just so long as it's OUR God in government. Perhaps the chair shouldn't have overridden the vote.

And Leviticus...that guy the right loves to cite when they condemn gay marriage. When they refuse to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples who want to marry. Leviticus says that a man who lays with another man is an abomination, but a woman who lays with another woman is kind of hot. The punishment for that sin? Not pretty. But gosh...just 3 verses prior to that old Lev talked about adultery. And the punishment was the same. Equal sins. And how many times did the man they voted for do that? Well...there was Ivana. There was Marla. Marla was one of the girls he committed adultery with while married to Ivana. Now there's Melania. She's one that Trump committed adultery with while he was married to Marla...and Trump was grabbing puzzies while Melania was pregnant with his child. Trump would even try to screw his associates wives. Christian values. Hypocrites.

 

[keeptheodds]

Hmmm...a guy like Trump represents the results of the era and the times we live in. And he's an immoral person.

Trump ran to "Make America Great Again". Does that mean that he wants to take us back to a time when we all can be raised to grab puzzies and cheat on our wives? Is that when America was considered "Great"? The only time Trump willing went into a church was when he heard that there would be a laying on of hands. He was sadly disappointed to find that he couldn't lay any hands on puzzies.



Back in 1980 they wanted to bring Christian values in government. They had a guy who taught Sunday School as one candidate. A candidate who confessed that he was human and had "lust in his heart" at a point in his marriage. A man where God play a large role in his life. But he didn't get their vote.

Fast Forward to 2016. I have friends who post on Facebook. They were torn in this election...they didn't like Hillary, but Trumps immorality concerned them. One person posted that the "godly man, Franklin Graham" endorsed Trump, so we should follow. Good little religious sheep...follow the leader. Franklin Graham and others on either side should have put their own agenda on the back burner. They call themselves "values voters", yet they were urged to vote for the man who lacks any shred of moral values. If their agenda was to vote for the candidate with high moral values, then they are hypocrites for voting for the candidate they eventually voted for. Frankie and others should have said that their flock should pray for guidance from God on what to do, but that they could not in good conscience recommend either.



Wow...they were ahead of their time. God shouldn't play a role in government because there are different versions of God. If God is in government, then they should be open to all Gods...the Muslim God. The Hindu God. The Buddhist God. The Indian Great Spirit. We've seen what God in government does. Google "Sharia Law". We want God in government...just so long as it's OUR God in government. Perhaps the chair shouldn't have overridden the vote.

And Leviticus...that guy the right loves to cite when they condemn gay marriage. When they refuse to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples who want to marry. Leviticus says that a man who lays with another man is an abomination, but a woman who lays with another woman is kind of hot. The punishment for that sin?

“Gay Marriage” is an oxymoron, it can’t exist in the definition of marriage alone. That’s the problem with liberals they want to change the laws of physics and biology to meet their utopian world that doesn’t exist. For example just because a dude cuts his junk off they want to regender him as a woman. For thousands of years they have already had a name for such a person. He’s now a eunuch. Welcome to reality.

 

[Insp4]

At a tank. They often say, never bring a knife to a gunfight. They also should say, never bring a gun to a tank fight

Now, can you imagine, Not one, but an army of these? ....... Now, what were you saying about a tank?

 

[KCFlyer]

“Gay Marriage” is an oxymoron, it can’t exist in the definition of marriage alone. That’s the problem with liberals they want to change the laws of physics and biology to meet their utopian world that doesn’t exist. For example just because a dude cuts his junk off they want to regender him as a woman. For thousands of years they have already had a name for such a person. He’s now a eunuch. Welcome to reality.

And we didn't change the adultery laws in the bible?

 

[delldude]

Hmmm...a guy like Trump represents the results of the era and the times we live in. And he's an immoral person.

Trump ran to "Make America Great Again". Does that mean that he wants to take us back to a time when we all can be raised to grab puzzies and cheat on our wives? Is that when America was considered "Great"? The only time Trump willing went into a church was when he heard that there would be a laying on of hands. He was sadly disappointed to find that he couldn't lay any hands on puzzies.



Back in 1980 they wanted to bring Christian values in government. They had a guy who taught Sunday School as one candidate. A candidate who confessed that he was human and had "lust in his heart" at a point in his marriage. A man where God play a large role in his life. But he didn't get their vote.

Fast Forward to 2016. I have friends who post on Facebook. They were torn in this election...they didn't like Hillary, but Trumps immorality concerned them. One person posted that the "godly man, Franklin Graham" endorsed Trump, so we should follow. Good little religious sheep...follow the leader. Franklin Graham and others on either side should have put their own agenda on the back burner. They call themselves "values voters", yet they were urged to vote for the man who lacks any shred of moral values. If their agenda was to vote for the candidate with high moral values, then they are hypocrites for voting for the candidate they eventually voted for. Frankie and others should have said that their flock should pray for guidance from God on what to do, but that they could not in good conscience recommend either.



Wow...they were ahead of their time. God shouldn't play a role in government because there are different versions of God. If God is in government, then they should be open to all Gods...the Muslim God. The Hindu God. The Buddhist God. The Indian Great Spirit. We've seen what God in government does. Google "Sharia Law". We want God in government...just so long as it's OUR God in government. Perhaps the chair shouldn't have overridden the vote.

And Leviticus...that guy the right loves to cite when they condemn gay marriage. When they refuse to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples who want to marry. Leviticus says that a man who lays with another man is an abomination, but a woman who lays with another woman is kind of hot. The punishment for that sin? Not pretty. But gosh...just 3 verses prior to that old Lev talked about adultery. And the punishment was the same. Equal sins. And how many times did the man they voted for do that? Well...there was Ivana. There was Marla. Marla was one of the girls he committed adultery with while married to Ivana. Now there's Melania. She's one that Trump committed adultery with while he was married to Marla...and Trump was grabbing puzzies while Melania was pregnant with his child. Trump would even try to screw his associates wives. Christian values. Hypocrites.

'Let he who has not sinned, cast the first stone.'

 

[KCFlyer]

'Let he who has not sinned, cast the first stone.'

Apparently many Christians feel that this doesn't apply to them.

 

[Insp4]

Liston K.C. first let's get back on topic!......... One of the first assumptions you make is that with the military turning it's Tanks, and Warthogs, on it's own people. Let me assure you the vast majority of those in the armed services would not do so! Not even if ordered to do so!

 

[Zom JFK]

At a tank. They often say, never bring a knife to a gunfight. They also should say, never bring a gun to a tank fight

I think if we ever had to resist the government their greatest asset wouldn't be their planes, tanks and nukes. It would be people like you that would just go belly up at the first sign of trouble.

 

[KCFlyer]

I think if we ever had to resist the government their greatest asset wouldn't be their planes, tanks and nukes. It would be people like you that would just go belly up at the first sign of trouble.

Being a realist isn't going "belly up". Using that as an argument to keep guns designed to kill as many school kids and concert goers in as short a time as possible is pretty lame.

 

[keeptheodds]

And we didn't change the adultery laws in the bible?

You are correct, not to change the subject but where is that liberal tolerance? Conservatives tolerated Obama for eight years hell Trumps only been in office for two. You have six more years to go, how much more butthurt can you get?

 

[Zom JFK]

Being a realist isn't going "belly up". Using that as an argument to keep guns designed to kill as many school kids and concert goers in as short a time as possible is pretty lame.

No KC going belly up when the odds are against you isn't being a realist. But you tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. History is replete with People that have overcome insurmountable odds and emerged victorious. Also to use the actions of a few mentally ill people to disarm the vast majority of lawful gun owners is pretty lame also. As horrifying as those events are it doesn't trump the rights of people to defend themselves. Not all gun owners kill kids or concert goers. That implication is also pretty lame.