The "Party of NO"........B E G S..........................

Sidebar
J

joanne

Advanced
Nov 29, 2009
182
1
HYPOCRITS !

OMG, this is Not a Washington POST Story, but a Washington ..T I M E S story.

Joe ("You Lie") Wilson leads the charge as he ELBOWS his way to the "TROUGH" ("Snort-Snort/Slurp-Slurp")

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/0...ng-cash//print/

No laws were broken though, because it's Not Illegal to "talk out of BOTH sides of your MOUTH" !

Wondering if FOX, Limbaugh, Hannity, Steele or Palin :mf_boff: will mention "This" ???
 
joanne said:
HYPOCRITS !

OMG, this is Not a Washington POST Story, but a Washington ..T I M E S story.

Joe ("You Lie") Wilson leads the charge as he ELBOWS his way to the "TROUGH" ("Snort-Snort/Slurp-Slurp")

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/0...ng-cash//print/

No laws were broken though, because it's Not Illegal to "talk out of BOTH sides of your MOUTH" !

Wondering if FOX, Limbaugh, Hannity, Steele or Palin :mf_boff: will mention "This" ???
Click to expand...

Even better: House Democrats Applaud Passage Of $1.9 Trillion Debt Limit Increase!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O81UD-ti4dk

Thats your party of Yes! Spend! Spend! Spend!
 
airbud said:
Even better: House Democrats Applaud Passage Of $1.9 Trillion Debt Limit Increase!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O81UD-ti4dk

Thats your party of Yes! Spend! Spend! Spend!
Click to expand...


What on Earth does your reply have to do with the FACTS that the Washington ..T I M E S....reported ????????

A lot of us, including some conservative poster here, (probably) would love to know.

Maybe you'd benefit from a "trip" through.."Websters", specifically in the area of the word.."Credibility".

MORE specifically........yours !
 
I thought airbud's response was rather on point.

Both parties are infected with hypocrissy. Now we have side by side PROOF positive of this point.
 
joanne said:
What on Earth does your reply have to do with the FACTS that the Washington ..T I M E S....reported ????????

A lot of us, including some conservative poster here, (probably) would love to know.

Maybe you'd benefit from a "trip" through.."Websters", specifically in the area of the word.."Credibility".

MORE specifically........yours !
Click to expand...

What was your old saying again you used to scream from the (circus tent) underbrush? It is what it is? :mf_boff:
 
Seatacus said:
Ok, so a person votes against the stimulus and it passes anyway. Does that mean you can't ask for a chunk of it since it is going to be spent on something anyway.
Click to expand...

The OP tries in desperation to somehow link the article to republican hypocrisy in a feeble attempt to defend the dismal performance of the new administration. Its like watching Olberman, Matthews and Maddow salivating into an orgasm, comical yet typical and embarrassing at the same time.

Doesn't detract from the fact that the party of Spend! Spend! Spend! is toast.
 
Which party are you referring too? The party that increased the debt from $5.6 trillion to $9 trillion and required Congress to increase the debt cap in 2006 or the party that increased the debt to $12.3 trillion (as of today)?

Personally, I cannot tell the difference between the two parties but perhaps your brown colored glasses can tell the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top Bottom