The Real One, not the media one.
[URL="http://cnsnews.com/news/artic...ctober-female-participation-rate-hits-new-low[/url]
[URL="http://cnsnews.com/news/artic...ctober-female-participation-rate-hits-new-low[/url]
Wealth inequality mirroring a drop in female and minority employment? There is a shock.UPNAWAY said:Female employment and minority employment have both been going down at higher rates than overall job numbers consistently under Obama. Also the wealth inequality has grown more under Obama. In otherwords women and minorities are wosre off under this president and the rich are just getting richer. I just wish the media headlines reflected that truth. I saw two headlines regaurding the job numbers today. "Obamacare not hurting job growth" & "Obama said sequesture defenitly hurt job numbers". Now which was it?
Glenn Quagmire said:They are worse off under this president?
And why your still jobless !Dog Wonder said:Literacy is a marketable skill.
Glenn Quagmire said:I
It is also nice to see that you will use the government BLS numbers when attempting to make your case, yet call them lying BS when they don't fit your narrative.
Rachel Glyn wrote to the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday expressing dismay at the number of freedoms Democrats wish to limit for women. She notes that Democrats believe that a woman has a constitutional right to an abortion but no constitutional right to choosing her doctor or health insurance plan.
http://freebeacon.com/letter-to-the-editor-democrats-believe-women-should-have-limited-freedom/
Glenn Quagmire said:I was wondering how long it would take for someone to trot out the employment figures that reflect the furlough of government workers as a result of the shutdown. I must admit that "war on women" angle gave me a chuckle.
You do realize those numbers released today include all those furloughed during the government shutdown.
"In September, according to the BLS, the female civilian labor force was 72,705,000. In October it dropped to 72,492,000a decline of 213,000."
You don't suppose that that number of women out of the 800,000 furloughed accounts for that number?
It is also nice to see that you will use the government BLS numbers when attempting to make your case, yet call them lying BS when they don't fit your narrative.
obama...lol can he even speak without lying?delldude said:Did you see the article about how Obama lied about UE figures right before the 2012 election?
If I remember, you were crowing over the accuracy of those reported numbers then.
http://nypost.com/2013/11/18/census-faked-2012-election-jobs-report/