New show on A&E follows WN behind the scenes at LAX and MDW. See link with a great preview. Be sure to watch with sound!
http://www.aetv.com/tv/shows/airline/
http://www.aetv.com/tv/shows/airline/
Incorrect. The age in question was 18 months, NOT 2 years. And to me the kid definitely looked older than 18 months.magsau said:The case involving the lap child that was suspect on being >2 years old was particularly disturbing.
Just pointing out that you were wrong as to the age that was being questioned in the show.magsau said:Children are not required to have ID. 18 months or 24 months the argument could have been avoided if the agent had advised the parent that they could get a refund if they presented ID after the flight. Do you mean that a new born baby should have ID? Passport? Perhaps baby fingerprints would work, since most babies tend to look alike <_<
Maybe I as the only one who caught this, but as the husband of the child was making as ass out of himself, when the SWA agent said that they would get a refund after the flight by presenting proof, and the smart assed wife said that if they had said that in the first place, the could have avoided this problem, the agent replied "I tried, but your husband wouldn't let me finish a sentence".magsau said:Children are not required to have ID. 18 months or 24 months the argument could have been avoided if the agent had advised the parent that they could get a refund if they presented ID after the flight. Do you mean that a new born baby should have ID? Passport? Perhaps baby fingerprints would work, since most babies tend to look alike <_<
As a result the only thing that was accomplished by the argument with the parents was yelling by the parents to the other passengers about the WN policy. Ill will between the pax and WN and not so flattering coverage.