Something is funny here. SW has the highest percentage of unionized workforce and have continously made money since the Wright brothers. Maybe... Just maybe if AA can outsorce management we can return to land of bonus cheques.
Something is funny here. Former ModerAAtor said:It's called the point of diminishing returns...
Maybe if we were the size of WN we'd be profitable, too.
[post="263028"][/post]
your right about being top heavy with mangement. when i was laid off out of st.louis alittle over a year ago. there was close to two hundred mech laid off out of st.louis. we went from close to 50 gates to somewhere around 10. but for some reason, not one supervisor got laid off. hmmm go figuregoingboeing said:Yeah,if we weren't so top heavy with management positions we might actually make a profit.
AA has supervisors supervising the supervisors and managers managing the managers.
Fleet size is not what affects profitability,but how efficient the management and the people are who are running the airline.
SWA is not a little airline as they operate over 400 aircraft.
[post="263212"][/post]
mike7867 said:...when i was laid off out of st.louis alittle over a year ago. there was close to two hundred mech laid off out of st.louis. we went from close to 50 gates to somewhere around 10. but for some reason, not one supervisor got laid off. hmmm go figure
[post="263226"][/post]
coolflyingfool said:I believe that some of it has to do with how your assets are used. Flying in and out of LAS a lot, I know that AA parks a B757 about 5pm for the night. That plane could generate more revenue by doing a run to DFW or ORD, even SJC. AA is paying for that plane, so use it one more time each day and make more money. If this were done in 10 cities each day, that would add up. I know it is a very simple plan and more goes in to it that just this, but just trying to show you how to do more with less. Just my thoughts......
[post="263036"][/post]
Former ModerAAtor said:Can't speak to workgroup specifics (which for some reason a few people on this board can't seem to get beyond), but at a macro level, the last time I saw numbers for senior managers to employees, AA ws already lower than WN.
Not all management positions are tied to the number of aircraft, i.e. if you have 100 aircraft or 1000, you'll still just have one VP of Sales, one VP of Finance, etc.
[post="263738"][/post]
enough already said:Why doesn't it surprise me that you would know more about management than workgroups? 😛h34r:
[post="263913"][/post]
Former ModerAAtor said:It's called the point of diminishing returns...
Maybe if we were the size of WN we'd be profitable, too.
[post="263028"][/post]