The curious editing, followed by the mysterious disappearance of a short thread featuring an email reply, supposedly from the CEO, is disturbing. Firstly, without evidence to the contrary, one has to assume it was real. The speed with which it was removed sort of validates that. As anyone who has been in a legal action knows, one of the first things the other side does is demand your emails. If you have been following the Wall Street trial about the high tech guy from CSFB, you would have seen that his emails were the backbone of the government's case. It's one of the reasons why lawyers tell corporate bigshots (and others) not to put stuff in those that you don't want looked at. It seems that if you choose to use that medium to communicate, those messages are kind of out there in cyberspace for anybody that can find them. Whomever deleted that should borrow a copy of the Constitution, or at least ask a good lawyer about the status of such communications, as it relates to public access. The real question here is why a smart corporate executive, with a degree from a better than average school, would go outside the corporate communications channel to author something like that. Shame on this board for playing censor. These guys are all over 21.