An interesting wrinkle in the R&D

Biffeman

Senior
Nov 25, 2002
447
0
www.usaviation.com
It seems that since the Ramp will be getting Reciept and Dispatch there is a problem with the contract language, theirs has not been changed to allow them to to R&D where maintenance is located.
 

tug_slug

Veteran
Sep 9, 2002
550
0
www.usaviation.com
[P]
[BLOCKQUOTE][BR]----------------[BR]On 1/23/2003 3:33:57 PM Biffeman wrote:
[P]It seems that since the Ramp will be getting Reciept and Dispatch there is a problem with the contract language, theirs has not been changed to allow them to to R&D where maintenance is located.[/P]----------------[/BLOCKQUOTE]
[P][/P]
[P]Biffe,[BR]Thats due to the wording in D-141/M's contract language. [/P]
[P][BR]Receipt and Dispatch.[BR]Article 2, B and Article 4, N of the Basic Agreement and other articles and[BR]provisions related to receipt and dispatch functions and ancillary duties[BR]associated with receipt and dispatch (except air starts) will be amended to[BR]provide that[FONT color=#ff0033] these functions may be performed by employees not covered[BR]under the Mechanical and Related Personnel Agreement [/FONT]except as follows:[BR]Mechanics will continue to perform the dispatch function of operating[BR]the pushback vehicle in BOS, DCA, LGA, PIT, CLT and PHL. During[BR]deicing events, irregular operations or when mechanics are not available[BR]due to performing non-dispatch mechanic duties on other aircraft, any[BR]other IAM represented employee may perform the dispatch function.[BR]Note: It is not the intent of the parties to utilize this provision in order to[BR]modify hangar staffing procedures or advance planning for deicing.[BR][/P]
 

delldude

Veteran
Oct 29, 2002
28,400
5,892
Downrange
www.youtube.com
[P]
[BLOCKQUOTE][BR]----------------[BR]On 1/24/2003 8:30:03 PM tug_slug wrote:
[P][BR][BR]
[BLOCKQUOTE][BR]----------------[BR]On 1/23/2003 3:33:57 PM Biffeman wrote: [BR][BR]It seems that since the Ramp will be getting Reciept and Dispatch there is a problem with the contract language, theirs has not been changed to allow them to to R&D where maintenance is located.----------------[/BLOCKQUOTE][BR][BR][BR][BR]Biffe,[BR]Thats due to the wording in D-141/M's contract language. [BR][BR][BR]Receipt and Dispatch.[BR]Article 2, B and Article 4, N of the Basic Agreement and other articles and[BR]provisions related to receipt and dispatch functions and ancillary duties[BR]associated with receipt and dispatch (except air starts) will be amended to[BR]provide that[FONT color=#ff0033] these functions may be performed by employees not covered[BR]under the Mechanical and Related Personnel Agreement [/FONT]except as follows:[BR]Mechanics will continue to perform the dispatch function of operating[BR]the pushback vehicle in BOS, DCA, LGA, PIT, CLT and PHL. During[BR]deicing events, irregular operations or when mechanics are not available[BR]due to performing non-dispatch mechanic duties on other aircraft, any[BR]other IAM represented employee may perform the dispatch function.[BR]Note: It is not the intent of the parties to utilize this provision in order to[BR]modify hangar staffing procedures or advance planning for deicing.[BR]
[P][/P]----------------[/BLOCKQUOTE]
[P][/P]wording is[STRONG] dispatch...[/STRONG]
 

delldude

Veteran
Oct 29, 2002
28,400
5,892
Downrange
www.youtube.com
we're hearing in PIT that company isn't cutting mechanics like they said they were going to.reports saying april they will be calling more back.anyone elsewhere hear anything?
 

Latest posts