Beyond Repair: Union Strife Divides Aa Mechanics

Checking it Out

Veteran
Apr 3, 2003
1,702
0
Beyond repair: Union strife divides AA mechanics
By D.R. STEWART World Staff Writer
4/11/2004

A backyard fight is becoming a national debate.

The union battle at American Airlines for the loyalty of 16,000 aircraft mechanics is turning into a referendum on economic and national security issues that mirrors the November presidential election.

The campaign between the incumbent Transport Workers Union, a traditional industrial union that has represented American mechanics since 1946, the year George W. Bush was born, and the upstart Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association features the familiar themes of post-9/11 security, democracy and job loss.

But the campaign also will gauge how mechanics view themselves, the future of their profession and the TWU, which agreed to 17 percent pay and benefit reductions and thousands of job cuts to avert a bankruptcy filing by American last spring.

In March, AMFA filed documents with the National Mediation Board for an election to determine union representation at American.

The board is in the process of verifying that sufficient authorization cards have been signed by American mechanics. AMFA needs signed authorization cards from 50 percent plus one of American's mechanics to hold an election.

If AMFA's documents are in order, an election could be held by summer, officials said.

While the nation's presidential candidates will debate the role of the United States in Iraq, domestic security versus domestic freedoms, tax cuts and energy policy, American Airlines mechanics are discussing job losses, wage and benefit concessions, bankruptcy and the future of the airline and the industry in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks and the start of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Coming amid industrywide losses estimated at $2.2 billion in 2004, rising fuel prices, hot competition from discount carriers, surplus capacity that constrains the major airlines' ability to raise ticket prices and an industry trend toward outsourcing of aircraft maintenance, the debate will be interesting, according to mechanics, union officials and analysts.

"The large hub-and-spoke carriers are having the most trouble, and there's not much they can do," said John Pincavage, who follows the airline industry for Pincavage & Associates in Westport, Conn. "You can't de-hub: You shed revenue faster than you can cut costs."

It's been a year since American's unionized mechanics, pilots and flight attendants voted to accept $1.8 billion a year in wage and benefit reductions to keep American from filing bankruptcy. At the same time, airline management trimmed an additional $2.2 billion in costs -- closing terminals, cutting thousands of jobs and parking hundreds of airplanes in the desert.

But in the aftermath of Chief Executive Officer Gerard Arpey's campaign "Come Together, Win Together," many mechanics are unhappy.

Pat Kinnamon, an American mechanic in Tulsa and TWU shop steward, said the concessions cost him $946 a month in wages and benefits, and five vacation days. He said he accepted the lower standard of living until it became obvious -- with the revelations of executive perks and bonuses last spring -- that the sacrifices were not being shared.

"Whether you support the TWU or AMFA, we all want the same thing: we want the airline to be profitable; we want competitive wages and benefits; and we want to be able to trust the wise leadership of the company and union," Kinnamon said. "But with everything that's gone on, everybody has lost credibility and faith in the union and the leadership of the company."

AMFA, a craft union not affiliated with the AFL-CIO and founded 40 years ago by former American mechanic O.V. Delle-Femine, has gathered strength in proportion to the discontent at American, say officials of TWU and AMFA.

Don Rodgers, chairman of the AMFA organizing committee in Tulsa, is a former TWU shop steward and an American mechanic since 1997. He said he broke ranks with the TWU because the industrial union is not democratic.

"If you asked the wrong questions, you weren't welcome," Rodgers said. "When it became obvious to me that they were more interested in putting dues in the international's pocket or getting out of work or being more worried about politics than the membership's best interests, I decided I would just work on airplanes, learn my trade, do my eight hours and go home. Discontent is what breeds change."

Bob Owens, an American mechanic at JFK International Airport in New York, said in a recent e-mail that the TWU talks about democracy, but its actions say otherwise.

"Last year when we got that concessionary contract rammed down our throats by Jim Little (TWU air transport division director in Fort Worth) with his crooked voting system and his 'without further ratification' signature, several locals sued," Owens writes. "In court, the TWU said that we do not even have the right to vote on our contracts, it's the international's contract, and they can modify it as they see fit without our permission, and the court, after reviewing our constitution, agreed.

"All you have to do is look at the cover of the contract book. It states that the TWU owns this contract -- no individual local has jurisdiction. So while the TWU tells the members about how they are in control and the locals are autonomous, just look at what they say in court when the members or locals want to actually assert the rights they were led to believe they had. They say the direct opposite. Their own testimony exposes them for the liars they are."

Little calls his critics "Monday morning quarterbacks."

After TWU members ratified the five-year concessionary contract last spring, company and union negotiators agreed on three contract modifications that the membership didn't vote on.

They included reopening the contract in 2006 for possible amendments, the union's ability to swap contract provisions of equal value and management's ability to participate in a performance bonus program based on company profitability.

"We knew if we went to a revote, American would file for bankruptcy," Little said. "Everyone told me you don't want to go there -- it would be disastrous; 12,000 people would lose their jobs."

AMFA's tough talk about not accepting concessions is just hot air, he said.

"They haven't been there; they didn't do the financial analyses," Little said. "We hired a financial banking group, three attorneys knowledgeable about bankruptcy, a research analyst -- but no one could tell us that we would be better off in bankruptcy. The pilots did their own analysis, and they found it was uncertain whether American could survive bankruptcy."

Art Luby, a Washington, D.C., lawyer for the TWU, said AMFA leaders tell supporters that they would have taken the company into bankruptcy and forced it to prove its case.

"The company was losing $5 million to $7 million a day. There would have been a (bankruptcy) filing sometime in late spring," Luby said. "The company (without concessions) would have run out of capital to sustain itself. I'm not aware of any analyst who came up with a different position."

Delle-Femine has told American mechanics that AMFA does not accept wage and benefit concessions.

"Northwest asked for concessions last year, and we had an outside firm look at their books and we decided they didn't need them," Delle-Femine said. "We don't believe in giving any company we represent long-term concessions for short-term economic problems. We said, 'If you need help, we will give you a loan, and after a year if your profits are up, you pay it back.' "

AMFA, however, has represented mechanics at Northwest Airlines during the past five years when Northwest eliminated thousands of mechanics' jobs. In June 1999, when AMFA took over from the International Association of Machinists, 9,500 mechanics and related workers were employed at Northwest. About half have been laid off, retired or taken voluntary layoffs, officials said.

Today, 3,500 mechanics are members of AMFA Local 33 in Minneapolis, and Northwest has shifted heavy maintenance to bases in Singapore and China, said Jim Atkinson, president of Local 33.

"The disturbing thing for us is that all major airline mechanics in this country must go through a 10-year criminal background check by the FBI," Atkinson said. "That was initiated after 9/11.

"Our ongoing question to the federal government is what kind of background check is being done on the people in Singapore and China? It's a concern to us that we know the backgrounds of these people who have full access to the airplanes."

At American, mechanics agreed to wage and benefit cuts until 2008 in return for preserving jobs and the Alliance Airport maintenance base in Fort Worth and the Kansas City International Airport maintenance facility, company and TWU officials said.

"I think there are better times ahead and American, not being in bankruptcy, will be better able to adjust to the times ahead," Little said.

Senior TWU officers have been meeting once a month with Arpey and his senior staff to discuss issues of importance to mechanics, Little said. TWU officers also meet periodically with American's chief financial officer to review the company's books.

"We have their books analyzed by our financial people. That's unprecedented," Little said.

Some mechanics are uncomfortable with the close ties between management and union officers.

Dave Stewart, an American mechanic in Tulsa and co-chair of the AMFA organizing committee, said if TWU officials violate the constitution or the law, the membership can vote them out.

"But if they continue selling you out by signing off on secret letters of agreement with management, you can't do anything about it," Stewart said. "What happens then is that with no accountability of officers, you have no accountability of members, which leads to discipline and production problems."

The TWU has become a business that sells members life, medical, short-term disability and supplemental medical insurance, Stewart said.

"It has become an institution that is a business within itself," he said. "They make decisions not based on members' well-being but on institutional financial well-being."

Rick Mullings, spokesman for TWU Local 514 in Tulsa, said the union has saved jobs and preserved a tradition unique among U.S. airlines.

"American Airlines is the only airline left in the industry doing over 80 percent of its maintenance in-house," Mullings said. "Our union is all about protecting workers and their rights.

"AMFA's unwillingness to take part in Washington politics is very bad for their members. If you believe you are a union and all you do is collect dues and not represent members' interests in Washington, that is just foolish. It's pretty obvious which union is protecting jobs and their members' interests."


Members of both unions said they worry about the stability of the airline industry and the future of their profession.

"The professionalism, passion and loyalty to the individual and the company is dropping, and it scares me," Stewart said. "There's a strong argument that the continued erosion of pay and benefits for skilled technicians will eventually erode the safety margin that is provided for the flying public.

"I'm not saying it's not safe to fly today, but the continued erosion of pay and benefits is going to have an effect."
 
The erosion I see is amfa and it's inability to keep work in house, hell to even keep it in the friggin' country for that matter. And unfortunately that is just a tragedy waiting to happen with a greater chance for a breach of security and shoddy work being done on the airplanes.

Dave Stewart (and who the hell made him the spokesman) is once again using scare tactics.
 
Keeping work inhouse is a serious concern for all unions. Of the eight airlines AMFA represents the only one you guys seem to care about is NWA. At Southwest work is returning after AMFA has taken over. Northwest has had to fight AMFA in Arbitration on many of its layoffs. The TWU has helped AA lift system protection and kick people out the gate after cutting our wages and benifits more than any other airline around. When people complain the TWU tell's people it would have been worse if we hadn't submitted to the companies wishes.
I believe we should have saved more money by making sure the management took the same cuts as us-they did not. Shared Sacrifice? Sell it to someone else liars.

TWU-will bend over if provoked!


Dave Steward was selected by the AMFA Organizing Committee at AA to represent us as co-chairman. One of his duties is to act as our spokesman.
 
Seems to me the twu brought this on themselves with 22 years of concessions and counting.

Hopefully after AMFA gets on the property we can once again become united and put this all behind us. Time to start fighting back for what we have lost....
 
proAMFA said:
Keeping work inhouse is a serious concern for all unions. Of the eight airlines AMFA represents the only one you guys seem to care about is NWA. At Southwest work is returning after AMFA has taken over. Northwest has had to fight AMFA in Arbitration on many of its layoffs. The TWU has helped AA lift system protection and kick people out the gate after cutting our wages and benifits more than any other airline around. When people complain the TWU tell's people it would have been worse if we hadn't submitted to the companies wishes.
I believe we should have saved more money by making sure the management took the same cuts as us-they did not. Shared Sacrifice? Sell it to someone else liars.

TWU-will bend over if provoked!


Dave Steward was selected by the AMFA Organizing Committee at AA to represent us as co-chairman. One of his duties is to act as our spokesman.
So did they ask me about the AMFA (propaganda)Organizing committee? Not that I can recall.

What work is AMFA "bringing back" to SWA? The other airlines AMFA represents don't have sufficient equipment to make in-house work economical.

Of course everyone brings up NWA, that is the poster child for AMFA represented airlines, all line and the hell with overhaul. For that matter it is also an example of AMFA's democracy is action, each local gets one vote during negotiations, but all the members of all locals have to pay dues based on their headcount.

Kind of like the GOP on taxes and elections. Neo-cons just can't change their stripes or spots. I prefer to think of them as having a nice white racing stripe down their back :)
 
Bill said:
The erosion I see is amfa and it's inability to keep work in house, hell to even keep it in the friggin' country for that matter. And unfortunately that is just a tragedy waiting to happen with a greater chance for a breach of security and shoddy work being done on the airplanes.

Dave Stewart (and who the hell made him the spokesman) is once again using scare tactics.
Hey Bill, where was the mighty afl-cio helping the iam prevent the allowance of overhaul at UAL? AMFA did not allow IND & OAK to close. The iam and mighty afl-cio did! And it was the iam that allowed UAL a/c to go overseas too.

Nice try "William", but at least AMFA fights to protect our profession. The iam & twu just roll over and expose their yellow belly.

The twu smells fear... and it is their own!

GO AMFA! :D
 
For that matter it is also an example of AMFA's democracy is action, each local gets one vote during negotiations, but all the members of all locals have to pay dues based on their headcount.

First of all, the members do not pay dues based upon the headcount of their Local.

Every member gets to vote for ratification. One member, one vote, and each member casts their own vote-no proxy voting like corporations and the TWU.

Why should Randy McDonald get to vote in behalf of 7000 members when less than half of that number ever cast a vote for him? He may have won the right to represent them, but should he also have the right to vote for them? Should he also have the right to determine the future of over 16000 members, most of whom are not in his local based upon as little as 3000 votes in Tulsa?


So AMFA modeled their "democracy" on that of The United States of America, while the TWU, according to you, modeled their "democracy" on that of big corporations.

Which structure is more "democratic"?


The one vote per Local guarantees equality at negotiations. The larger locals still have the advantage when it comes to ratification.

The TWUs structure pretty much makes the majority of locals spectators, not equals. Its like our government where the two Senators from sparsly populated Oklahoma have the same electoral power in the Senate as New York or California, however in order for a bill to become law it must also pass the House of Representatives where proportional represention, and voting exists. Its a form of checks and balances that ensures that the smaller states cant just be disregarded by the larger states. If we simply allow majority rule, without any safeguards for the rights of the minority then there is no moral, ethical or practical reason for the minority to support or remain associated with the majority. If you want unity, it has to be fair, something that you and your comrades have absolutely no comprehension of.
 
There is a big difference between lobbying in Washington D.C. in favor of worker/mechanic specific issues and funding Election Campaigns like Gephardts.

Why is this difference so hard for TWU stooges to understand?

Nobody ever said anything about AMFA not being involved in political lobbying.

It the useless contributions to failing campaigns that only last one week that I hear most members opposing.

Funding Campaigns - FOOLISH
Membership Lobby - Great Idea

TWU and the AFL-CIO - FAILED POLICY

AMFA - HOPE of Our Future and Profession


Tell us Mr. Mullings, did Gephardt refund your contributions once he quit?
 
Bill said:
Dave Stewart (and who the hell made him the spokesman) is once again using scare tactics.
That is a basic difference with AMFA.

You and I are entitlted to our opinions and we do not have a "spokesperson" telling everyone what we think.

Bill, you are confusing AMFA with the thought police TWU. Please learn the facts.

You want to see fear tactics? Take alook at any and all anti-amfa TWU literature and tell us what you read?

Here is one for you...

Video - Chest Pounding TWU Spokesperson Advocating Mechanic Concessions

Tell us Bill, are you one in favor of Wal-Marting our jobs and profession? Are you going to work at AA as a greeter when you retire and welcome the AA Associates to work everyday? Are you going to wear your smiley button and greet everyone at the turnstiles and they show up to slave in your sweatshop?
 
Actually Dave the wal-marting is amfa and the unlimited outsourcing they are allowing at the majority of the airlines they represent!



If you are so confident, why not have Delle come to the debate next week? Or is he pulling your strings?
 
Checking it Out said:
Actually Dave the wal-marting is amfa and the unlimited outsourcing they are allowing at the majority of the airlines they represent!



If you are so confident, why not have Delle come to the debate next week? Or is he pulling your strings?
I didn't know Wal-Mart paid $35+ per hour with full benefits, Holidays, Vacation, and Sick Leave Pay.

Maybe we should all go to work there.

What does AA/TWU pay a shop mechanic now to start out $8.89 per hour? :(


BTW, Delle is his own man, and will debate Jim Little when he is ready.
I bet Jim fails to show when the offer comes!

Given your recently released video, the size of the room, and the weekday schedule, the TWU intentions are something other than inform the membership. We are not as predictable as you and the gang of stooges.
 
WAL-MARTing your Profession

pay_vs_cpi.jpg
 
Decision 2004 said:
I didn't know Wal-Mart paid $35+ per hour with full benefits, Holidays, Vacation, and Sick Leave Pay.

Maybe we should all go to work there.

What does AA/TWU pay a shop mechanic now to start out $8.89 per hour? :(


BTW, Delle is his own man, and will debate Jim Little when he is ready.
I bet Jim fails to show when the offer comes!

Given your recently released video, the size of the room, and the weekday schedule, the TWU intentions are something other than inform the membership. We are not as predictable as you and the gang of stooges.
So your post in the past! That indicated you would have a presence is a lie?

So you also admit Delle is pulling your strings? Sounds like you maybe one of his puppets?
 
Checking it Out said:
So your post in the past! That indicated you would have a presence is a lie?

So you also admit Delle is pulling your strings? Sounds like you maybe one of his puppets?
Can you translate this message? I really don't understand your point!

Is this actually English? Or some language that the liberals have developed to communicate with legal er uh illegal aliens?
 

Latest posts