Biggest Liars?

What did you expect from state controlled media?

And you actually consume it?

And then post it?

Tells a lot where your head is at buddy boy.
 
Ifly2 said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/opinion/campaign-stops/all-politicians-lie-some-lie-more-than-others.html?_r=1

Carson
Trump
Cruz


Most Honest?

Sanders
Clinton
Obama
O'Malley
Clinton - the William Jefferson kind
 
selfie-stick-hub_obama-using-selfie-stick_5-980x600.jpg
 
NYT is well known to be the state controlled media. They have a long history of covering for Democrats while smearing everyone else.
 
townpete said:
What did you expect from state controlled media?
And you actually consume it?
And then post it?
Tells a lot where your head is at buddy boy.

And you referring to it as "state controlled" tells us a lot about where your head's at...


  
townpete said:
NYT is well known to be the state controlled media. They have a long history of covering for Democrats while smearing everyone else.
"Lol"
 
non the less it's Ol Hill as Bears lovingly calls her that has the major trust issues in polls
 
Kev3188 said:
And you referring to it as "state controlled" tells us a lot about where your head's at...
  

"Lol"
Prove me wrong buttercup.

Theres a long list that shows how NYT repeatedly covers for Democrats, at the same time smearing any opposition.

And has so for years.
 
townpete said:
Prove me wrong buttercup.

Theres a long list that shows how NYT repeatedly covers for Democrats, at the same time smearing any opposition.

And has so for years.
That the NYT leans left is in the same category as water being wet.

The idea that it's "state run" is point and laugh worthy.
 
Kev3188 said:
That the NYT leans left is in the same category as water being wet.

The idea that it's "state run" is point and laugh worthy.
 
Reading comprehension is hard eh buttercup?
 
I said "state controlled" not 'state run". There's a big difference
 
Shall I show some examples to embarrass you?
 
Exhibit A: NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission
 
If you read The New York Times‘ story on President Barack Obama‘s private meeting with news columnists Friday morning, you may have caught one quote that made the President look particularly bad:
 

In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments.

 
The President of the United States failed to understand that Americans were anxious after two major terrorist attacks in Western cities because he doesn’t watch TV? It’s an admission that opponents are sure to use to make the president seem out-of-touch at best, and unconcerned about a serious threat at worst.
 
But just as the quote was beginning to make the rounds, it disappeared entirely from the the Times piece, without a correction or any indication that the piece had been updated.
 
Instead, the paragraph in question has been replaced with the following, which doesn’t appear to have any connection to the original paraphrase:
 

“Mr. Obama argued that while there were potentially threats that would merit the kind of investment of lives and money equivalent to that made in the Iraq war, the Islamic State does not pose an existential threat to the United States and therefore the response should be measured. The United States needs to take on the group, in part to defend allies in the region, he said, but it should not be an all-out war.
Moreover, he added, part of the group’s strategy is to draw the United States into a broader military entanglement in the region. A sustained but limited campaign may be slow and politically unsatisfying, but ultimately will be more successful, he contended.”

 
 
Now lets compare and contrast the difference how Email scandals are handled when the person is a Republican.
 

WaPo, NYT to crowdsource Palin emailshttp://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0611/WaPo_to_crowdsource_Palin_emails.html
 
A massive trove of nearly 25,000 pages of Sarah Palin’s emails from her time as governor of Alaska will be released tomorrow, and the Washington Post has come up with a novel way of dealing with them – ask readers to pitch in.
“That's a lot of email for us to review so we're looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those emails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release,” writes WaPo’s Ryan Kellett.”We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the emails.”
 
townpete said:
Reading comprehension is hard eh buttercup?
 
I said "state controlled" not 'state run". There's a big difference
 
Shall I show some examples to embarrass you?
Okay, fine. "State controlled."

Doesn't change the absurdity of your post, nor my reaction to it.
 
Back
Top