Continental Alliance Progress

boxer

Veteran
Feb 28, 2003
979
45
SFO
Visit site
Glenn Tilton, president, chairman and CEO, sent the following message in an e-mail to all employees on Thursday, November 13.

Late yesterday afternoon, the U.S. Department of Transportation set the timetable for final consideration of our application for Continental to join the group of nine Star Alliance carriers that already hold antitrust immunity and to start a trans-Atlantic joint venture among United, Continental, Lufthansa and Air Canada. We are in the home stretch of this DOT process.

This is another significant milestone for us and brings us closer to being able to develop extensive codesharing with Continental in the U.S., compete well with other alliances and pool our international passenger revenues across the Atlantic. If awarded anti-trust immunity, we can work with our partners to operate as a single carrier on these international services, delivering more travel options and better competing with our larger competitors.

After my last e-mail, I heard from many of you that you were encouraged by the opportunity the planned alliance with Continental creates for all of us and for our customers. Our competitors are taking note of this opportunity as well. The day after the Delta-Northwest merger received approval from the Department of Justice, in a spoil tactic, Delta filed an objection to what we provided to the DOT to support our application for antitrust immunity, seeking to delay our approval by requesting additional information. The DOT agreed yesterday that we had provided sufficient information in our application, and it is proceeding over Delta’s objection to move forward with final consideration of our application.

The DOT has set a timetable of two weeks for others to comment on our application, supporting it or objecting to it. We will have seven business days to respond and anticipate we could receive approval as soon as next month. This application was a significant effort, with 10 carriers involved, and because of the thoroughness and rigor of the work behind it, it has moved forward effectively.

I told you in my last email of the upcoming meetings with Continental CEO Larry Kellner and members of our teams in Houston. When we met last Friday, we reviewed the progress all teams are making along multiple workstreams. Larry and I reviewed and endorsed some 25 separate projects that, once implemented, would capture important cost savings and create opportunities in the areas of information technology, frequent flyer programs, lounges, procurement and sales and marketing. While in Houston, John Tague and I also had the opportunity to tour Continental’s operations center.

As the economic and business environment continues to be impacted by a combination of unprecedented factors, we see tremendous value in our planned alliance from a cost, revenue and customer satisfaction perspective, and our peers clearly see that our unique relationship with Continental is a competitive threat. As we have discussed, we have the right network, right people and importantly, right partners to succeed in this market. And, as we saw with our application before the DOT, hard work, rigor and a focus on running the best airline will win the day.

We look forward to completing our planned alliance with Continental and will keep you updated on our progress.



Be safe and stay United,
Glenn



Last Updated: 2008.11.13
 
Say what you will, I still see this as a preamble to a merger...with this being the first step.



.......GOD, I hope not........ :shock:

Uncle Larry looked at UA's books, and said NO.
We'll see how this DL/NW "New Delta" plays out first. It they become the 800lb gorilla of the airline industry, then
maybe.....just MAYBE the unthinkable might just take place with Uncle Larry and his excellent team running things.

Tilton and his crew will take their "golden parachute" elsewhere.

Please, no merger, but a good working agreement with the United people, (who took more hell than us) and the Star Alliance.
 
Tilton has already delivered enough 'spoil tactics' to his own people. Amusing comments. Twice he references the competition. Insecure much? Bubbling about a tour of his sweethearts place??

UA could've accomplished the same value as CO if Glenn and the boys had focused the past years instead of all the (cough cough) distractions.

How's those new plane orders boxer?
 
How's those new plane orders boxer?
[/quote]

Why ask me? I have no clue. I didn't want to buy an airline so I retired in 1994.
 
Say what you will, I still see this as a preamble to a merger...with this being the first step.
If there were a UA/CO merger, it would be interesting to see how representational things pan out and if the Continental rampers/ticket workers would want to pay dues or vote union out to keep what they have.

regards,
Tim Nelson
IAM Local Chairman, 1487, Chicago
 
If there were a UA/CO merger, it would be interesting to see how representational things pan out and if the Continental rampers/ticket workers would want to pay dues or vote union out to keep what they have.

regards,
Tim Nelson
IAM Local Chairman, 1487, Chicago

IN this day and age of Contracting out stations to lower cost .. CO rampers would be FOOLS .. Fools I tell ya

to not consider aligning themselves with UNION representation..... Without a union ramp US fleet would have

all been contracted out by now.
 
IN this day and age of Contracting out stations to lower cost .. CO rampers would be FOOLS .. Fools I tell ya

to not consider aligning themselves with UNION representation..... Without a union ramp US fleet would have

all been contracted out by now.


In most cases, that would be true.
Right now most of the "Market" cities (the stations in the NE + the hub at EWR) would love to have the union in.
But the outstations and Houston probably would vote it down.

BTW: Last year TWU tried to organize but lost by about 300 or so votes.

This year, the IAM is gonna try (just got my card about a month ago) Either they will try by January, or wait for the new administration to see if they can get "card check" passed, and we'll see the real numbers. The votes bave been suspiciously been voted down by 100 - 200 votes. I hope it would pass and we'll get a union, but right now, the numbers don't look too good, but we keep trying.

BTW: We got another 2% back starting Jan. 1 of 2009, plus differential working in the "Market" cities I've mentioned. Still not nearly what we lost, but 6% back (over 2 and a half years is a start in the right direction)
Uncle Larry has been fair so far, and a lot of new people came on board in the last couple of years or so, and they have no idea what we lost over the years. So trying to convice that group about a union will be tough too.

My personal preference would be the IAM.
I would not want to have a concessionary contract like AA has with TWU. (JMHO)