Arguably the biggest issue dividing the yes votes from the no votes is the amount of jobs that will be lost to outsourcing. When LBO2 came out with a percentage of spend rather than man-hours a very diabolical formula was put in place. In simple terms, for every $100 spent on maintenance $65 will be spent in-house with $35 spent on outsourcing. Consider shop rates that are half of ours at AA. For simplicity let’s say our shop rate is $65 per man-hour and that of an MRO 's is $35 per man-hour. The percentage of in-house versus outsource in man-hours is 50%. The percentages get skewed even more when you consider the shop rates for engine and components versus the shop rates for out of country MRO’s airframe work. If you’re voting yes to save jobs think again.