Following A Different Path?

DBP, PBGC, FAA, DOJ & HDR

Alphabet soup that spells trouble for the Defined Benefit Pension Plans in the Airline Industry.

Former ModerAAtor said:
ORD hasn't been slot restricted for a couple of years now.  There's a memorandum of understanding with carriers not to increase service there at the moment, but that's voluntary and only applies during peak hours.
[post="277108"][/post]​
--------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the previously referenced article from AW&ST, April 11 2005, it now appears that DOJ, Department of Justice, has signed on for "slot auctions" at ORD as a means to ensure previous complaints of "anti-competitive" practices in the awarding of slot authorities be cured.(Ref: AW&ST June 6, 2005.)

Again, this is simply the template by which other "slot controlled" airports covered under the current HDR, High Density Slot Rule, are forced to re-allocate their capacity in light of "market-forces."

Congress, both Republican and Democrat, are firm in their committment that a quasi federal entity like AMTRAK, but covering the airlines, will not be allowed to be placed at their feet.

With the coals being heated with respect to the pension debacle looming at their doorstep, both parties will play ball and ink a deal that "holds both parties harmless."

IMHO: If you have to score this one, employees will make out in the short run on the DBPs; employers will take it in the shorts for those currently covered but make it back in concessions to come up with the cash for the auctions as a means to continue doing business.
 
Boomer said:
DBP, PBGC, FAA, DOJ & HDR

Alphabet soup that spells trouble for the Defined Benefit Pension Plans in the Airline Industry.
--------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the previously referenced article from AW&ST, April 11 2005, it now appears that DOJ, Department of Justice, has signed on for "slot auctions" at ORD as a means to ensure previous complaints of "anti-competitive" practices in the awarding of slot authorities be cured.(Ref: AW&ST June 6, 2005.)

Again, this is simply the template by which other "slot controlled" airports covered under the current HDR, High Density Slot Rule, are forced to re-allocate their capacity in light of "market-forces."

Congress, both Republican and Democrat, are firm in their committment that a quasi federal entity like AMTRAK, but covering the airlines, will not be allowed to be placed at their feet.

With the coals being heated with respect to the pension debacle looming at their doorstep, both parties will play ball and ink a deal that "holds both parties harmless."

IMHO: If you have to score this one, employees will make out in the short run on the DBPs; employers will take it in the shorts for those currently covered but make it back in concessions to come up with the cash for the auctions as a means to continue doing business.
[post="279429"][/post]​

So who should we trust, AW&ST or someone who posts under the alias of "Former ModerAAtor"?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #79
Boomer said:
Silence implies consent.
[post="280408"][/post]​

No, silence implies a life other than posting on internet bulletin boards....

There is an FAA order limiting the number of arrivals per hour at ORD, but slots as enforced at LGA, JFK, and DCA no longer exist at ORD.

http://www.faa.gov/news/reduce_delays/medi...9;HareOrder.htm

You can believe AW&ST, but I put a little more faith in the FAA's order.
 
Former ModerAAtor said:
No, silence implies a life other than posting on internet bulletin boards....

There is an FAA order limiting the number of arrivals per hour at ORD, but slots as enforced at LGA, JFK, and DCA no longer exist at ORD.

http://www.faa.gov/news/reduce_delays/medi...9;HareOrder.htm

You can believe AW&ST, but I put a little more faith in the FAA's order.
[post="280491"][/post]​


AMFAMAN said:
Sure we do...It's cheaper than driving and a hell of alot faster than walking. :p
[post="280516"][/post]​
-----------------------------------------------------

The government is not planning to auction airport slots like William Riss, Governmental Affairs Officer for AA, did not say that the issue surrounding foreign ownership of US Carriers should be separated from issues like amending the Railway Labor Act. (Ref: AW&ST, March 30, 2005)

Labor and AA Management: Charting a New Course, yeah right!
 
arpey may wish to avert BK, but with two major carriers already there and more stating that it may be the only way to survive, I believe AA will too have to seriously weigh our chances of competing in a world of $60 oil especially since the other Majors are getting away with dumping the pension's into the taxpayer laps!
 
Former ModerAAtor said:
No, silence implies a life other than posting on internet bulletin boards....

There is an FAA order limiting the number of arrivals per hour at ORD, but slots as enforced at LGA, JFK, and DCA no longer exist at ORD. 

http://www.faa.gov/news/reduce_delays/medi...9;HareOrder.htm

You can believe AW&ST, but I put a little more faith in the FAA's order.
[post="280491"][/post]​
<_< Excuse me! But wasn't STL suposed to take up the slack ORD couldn't handle? Or is the TWA stigma still pravalant in the hollowed halls there in Dallas???? :down:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top