Fliers, beware post-merger promises from airlines When American Airlines announced in 2001 that it would buy St. Louis-based TWA, it touted a range of consumer benefits, from "broader customer choice" to making St. Louis' airport one of the USA's major hubs.
This past Saturday, the promises vanished in a wave of cuts that leave travelers with fewer choices. American slashed flights out of St. Louis by half and ended non-stop service to 27 destinations, ranging from Moline, Ill., to New York's Kennedy Airport.
In the 2½ years since the merger, much has happened that American could not predict. A recession and the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks changed air travel forever.
But the moral to the American-TWA saga is straightforward: Beware of airlines promising gifts for consumers as they seek approval for mergers and buyouts. Rafts of rosy rhetoric don't change the fact that when airlines combine, consumers often lose.
American continues to put a bright face on the changes. A press release last July referred obliquely to the drastic cuts by saying St. Louis would be a "smaller hub" catering to people in the area. On the eve of the changes, a spokesman said the airline was "right-sizing" service, not downsizing it. But if St. Louis had excess flights, American gave no hint of the problem when it announced its buyout of ailing TWA.
In fact, the cutbacks have a deeper impact on consumers than American's characterizations suggest. Consider:
•Fewer flights. Since the buyout, American has cut flights out of St. Louis by 59%, from 504 to 209, according to its figures.
•Fewer cities American serves 68 cities from St. Louis, down from TWA's 96. Non-stop service to small cities has been hit. Columbia, Mo., went from five American flights a day to two as of Saturday. Non-stop service to Moline, Ill., is gone; American passengers now must connect through Chicago.
•Fewer seats. Travelers who prefer roomier jetliners are more likely to be booked on smaller planes and pay higher fares. For instance, American will continue to fly six times a day to New York's LaGuardia Airport, but three flights will be on small jets with a third to half as many seats. With less capacity, the airline will have fewer discount tickets to sell, says Tom Parsons, CEO of Bestfares.com, a discount Web site. Overall, flights on large jets out of St. Louis have been cut by 75%.
Schedule cuts and higher fares following mergers are not unusual. In the last great spate of mergers during the 1980s, several proved harmful to consumers. When American and US Airways bought two in-state California airlines, fares quickly shot up. Deals combining Northwest and Republic and US Airways and Piedmont cut the heart out of competition in many markets.
Today, as struggling airlines seek ways to survive, stricter federal scrutiny of proposed mergers or buyouts can better protect against airlines' unrealistic promises that competition won't suffer. Regulators quickly signed off on the American-TWA deal in about three months.
Airlines, for their part, owe passengers more candor. True, the industry could not have foreseen 9/11. But airlines can be more forthright about the many uncertainties at play that could prevent them from fulfilling their optimistic predictions.
The flying public deserves honest information, not sky-high promises.
-----------------
This past Saturday, the promises vanished in a wave of cuts that leave travelers with fewer choices. American slashed flights out of St. Louis by half and ended non-stop service to 27 destinations, ranging from Moline, Ill., to New York's Kennedy Airport.
In the 2½ years since the merger, much has happened that American could not predict. A recession and the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks changed air travel forever.
But the moral to the American-TWA saga is straightforward: Beware of airlines promising gifts for consumers as they seek approval for mergers and buyouts. Rafts of rosy rhetoric don't change the fact that when airlines combine, consumers often lose.
American continues to put a bright face on the changes. A press release last July referred obliquely to the drastic cuts by saying St. Louis would be a "smaller hub" catering to people in the area. On the eve of the changes, a spokesman said the airline was "right-sizing" service, not downsizing it. But if St. Louis had excess flights, American gave no hint of the problem when it announced its buyout of ailing TWA.
In fact, the cutbacks have a deeper impact on consumers than American's characterizations suggest. Consider:
•Fewer flights. Since the buyout, American has cut flights out of St. Louis by 59%, from 504 to 209, according to its figures.
•Fewer cities American serves 68 cities from St. Louis, down from TWA's 96. Non-stop service to small cities has been hit. Columbia, Mo., went from five American flights a day to two as of Saturday. Non-stop service to Moline, Ill., is gone; American passengers now must connect through Chicago.
•Fewer seats. Travelers who prefer roomier jetliners are more likely to be booked on smaller planes and pay higher fares. For instance, American will continue to fly six times a day to New York's LaGuardia Airport, but three flights will be on small jets with a third to half as many seats. With less capacity, the airline will have fewer discount tickets to sell, says Tom Parsons, CEO of Bestfares.com, a discount Web site. Overall, flights on large jets out of St. Louis have been cut by 75%.
Schedule cuts and higher fares following mergers are not unusual. In the last great spate of mergers during the 1980s, several proved harmful to consumers. When American and US Airways bought two in-state California airlines, fares quickly shot up. Deals combining Northwest and Republic and US Airways and Piedmont cut the heart out of competition in many markets.
Today, as struggling airlines seek ways to survive, stricter federal scrutiny of proposed mergers or buyouts can better protect against airlines' unrealistic promises that competition won't suffer. Regulators quickly signed off on the American-TWA deal in about three months.
Airlines, for their part, owe passengers more candor. True, the industry could not have foreseen 9/11. But airlines can be more forthright about the many uncertainties at play that could prevent them from fulfilling their optimistic predictions.
The flying public deserves honest information, not sky-high promises.
-----------------