Guy Arrested for Saggy Pants to Sue US Airways
- Thread starter FM2436
- Start date
He was "arrested by a pilot"? Seriously?
nycbusdriver
Veteran
Hardly.
"Deshon was arrested on suspicion of battery on a police officer, resisting arrest, and trespassing."
His arrest was over how he dealt with police officers, not with his sagging pants. If he does sue US Airways over the sagging pants issue, he will lose if it goes to a jury. Most "peers" (as in "jury of") think the saggers are nitwits for appearing in public looking so ridiculous. I'll bet if a sagger showed up in court like that, the judge would throw him out or jail him for contempt.
xUT
Veteran
Yep, he has a big payday coming. Can't complain about seeing someones underwear when you let white frequent fliers wear undies 'all the time'.
Man flies US Airways in women's underwear (Photo)
Man flies US Airways in women's underwear (Photo)
ContUNITEus
Veteran
- Joined
- May 4, 2011
- Messages
- 501
- Reaction score
- 580
US Airways deserves it.
Get 'hem good.
Get 'hem good.
signals
Veteran
And this comes as a shock because... 🙄
xUT
Veteran
Discrimination, he has an easy case as long as he didn't show his 'private parts', not sure if 'butt cracks' are private parts...
Dont call me Shirley
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 3,270
- Reaction score
- 306
and most jurors will - I hope - take issue with the resisting arrest. And that is, after all, the reason for the trip to the cop shop. Oh yeah, and his outstanding warrant. (If that is allowed into evidence)
Now, if they could just arrest the women's underwear guy. 😀 🙄
xUT
Veteran
IMHO, since his arrest was dropped, this could not be used in court. USAir has no case.
What they 'should' do is create a dress code other than 'if your junk aint a show'n u be a flyin'...
Nutt sacks, wieners, nipples and camel toes are acceptable as long as d'ay be covered by some fabric...
Standards... 😛
ContUNITEus
Veteran
- Joined
- May 4, 2011
- Messages
- 501
- Reaction score
- 580
Discrimination, he has an easy case as long as he didn't show his 'private parts', not sure if 'butt cracks' are private parts...
LOL... That's funny you mention that. At my current airline there was an executive the other day doing an audit. Young Woman... in jeans... and guess what.... she was showing some serious crack at the gate.... LOL
All of us employees were laughing about the amount of crack that was exposed.
I should have had her arrested.
🙂
Just kidding...
California jurors have a long history of returning large verdicts against police officers for making illegal arrests. There was no probable cause to arrest Deshon Marman; that is why the District Attorney declined to file any criminal charges following his arrest.
The outstanding warrant is not relevant to this incident and will be excluded from evidence in the trial against US Airways and its employees, if the case proceeds that far. The warrant does not excuse US Airways' employees blatant racial discrimination against him when they removed him from the aircraft for no valid reason and called law enforcement officers to have him arrested.
No, the case was dropped because there were better uses for the limited resources of the district attorney's office. Crime or not, it wasn't worth prosecuting in their own words. If the company doesn't settle this out of court, the jury will probably give him some absurdly large amount of money because that's what juries do in the US.
