Heterophobia?

SparrowHawk

Veteran
Nov 30, 2009
7,824
2,707
It seems in our currently politically correct society that anyone who for any reason questions the wisdom of Gay marriage or anything involving same sex couples they are labeled HomoPhobes by the Homo promo crowd and those with political agendas; Consider the below posted news regarding military benefits.

Unwed Couples to Get Military Benefits — Only If They’re Gay
Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has issued a directive stating that certain military benefits formerly reserved for married couples will now be extended to unmarried partners — but only if they’re same-sex partners.
Heterosexual unmarried partners do not qualify for the benefits.
Panetta issued his directive in a memorandum to the secretaries of the military departments and the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness.
Citing the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, Panetta states: “Discrimination based on sexual orientation no longer has a place in the military.”
The memorandum continues: “At the direction of the President, the Department has conducted a careful and deliberative review of the benefits currently provided to the families of Service members. We have now identified additional family member and dependent benefits that we can lawfully provide to same-sex domestic partners of Military Service members and their children through changes in Department of Defense policies and regulations.
“These benefits shall be extended to the same-sex domestic partners and, where applicable, children of same-sex domestic partners, once the Service member and their same-sex domestic partner have signed a declaration attesting to the existence of their committed relationship.”
The declaration defines a “domestic partner” as a “person in a domestic partnership with a Service member of the same sex,” and a “domestic partnership” as a “committed relationship between two adults, of the same sex, that meets all of the requirements below.”
Among those requirements, neither of the partners can be “married, joined in a civil union with, or domestic partners with anyone else,” and the partners intend to remain in a committed relationship “indefinitely.”
Among the benefits the Pentagon will now give to same-sex domestic partners but not to heterosexual unwed couples are disability and death compensation, legal assistance, some travel on Department of Defense aircraft, commissary privileges, welfare and recreation programs, emergency leave, and access to a “sexual assault counseling program.”
Panetta’s memorandum also states that because of the Defense of Marriage Act, the Defense Department cannot extend all of the benefits given to married couples to unmarried same-sex domestic partners, including healthcare and housing allowances.
But it adds: “In the event that the Defense of Marriage Act is no longer applicable to the Department of Defense, it will be the policy of the Department to construe the words ‘spouse’ and ‘marriage’ without regard to sexual orientation, and married couples, irrespective of sexual orientation, will be granted full military benefits.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Easy fix. Allow equal access to marriage for all. Male/Female relationships have a choice of how they live. Same sex partners do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Easy fix. Allow equal access to marriage for all. Male/Female relationships have a choice of how they live. Same sex partners do not.

Kind of demonstrates the hypocrisy of the left.

For me it further proves that Government should be OUT of the marriage business AND the Health Care business. Allow the people to live as they choose.
 
I called it NORMALPHOBE but nobody noticed.

We should investigate why the psychiatric community removed HOMOSEXUALITY from the DSM1. Perhaps because the gay became psychiatrists?

NAH, it must be Homophobe because I'm affraid I'll become gay :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What exactly is hypocritical?

The government is involved in marriage so how about we stick with reality instead of pipe dreams?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What exactly is hypocritical?

The government is involved in marriage so how about we stick with reality instead of pipe dreams?

Why? The Creator confers Liberty, NOT the government. Individual Liberty means you live your life as YOU choose free from the encumbered and prying eyes of Government. Government has no business regulating marriage, gay or otherwise. The appropriate role of government is to enforce contracts in this situation.

The left is hypocritical by definition as they try to tell people how to live their lives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The government has and does regulate marriage.

Surely you jest. The right has been the one saying what people may or may not do in the privacy of their homes or with their bodies. The right has said when people can buy liquor, who people can sleep with, what kind of sex is allowed, what people may smoke.... The left as far as I am aware has never sought to restrict rights from any group but to extend rights to groups or peoples who's rights have been restricted or denied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Man we never have any action like that in Pittsburgh.

Do that crap in public and tie the face to a corporation and see how popular it is.
Dude, I didn't link the site where they had pictures of children walking the streets watching this dysfunctional public display! Sponsored by Miller Beer. . . WTF Over?
 
The left as far as I am aware has never sought to restrict rights from any group .....

Which certainly explains all the socialist fruit bats that so eagerly wish to disarm law abiding citizens, I suppose?

"as far as I am aware" Doesn't reach very far at all in terms of actual awareness, it seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
If you wish to speak about gun laws there is another on going discussion here. The discussion here is referring to same sex couple rights and rights related to how a person can conduct ones personal life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people

Latest posts