Liberal Dems Loved Spending...................

[southwind]

........................other peoples money ! :down:

NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly says the security costs will exceed $75 milion for the "Islamic Terrorist Trial" !

http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/17361760

or maybe this is Nobama's way of stimulating job growth.

Personally, I prefer the other method, Military Tribunal = 1 bullet a peice....................priceless !

Oh and don't forget about the most recent "Islamic Terrorist"............he'll be recieving skin graphs soon, keeping all those doctors and nurses employed, way to go Nobama...........thats change we can believe in !

 

[dapoes]

........................other peoples money ! :down:

NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly says the security costs will exceed $75 milion for the "Islamic Terrorist Trial" !

http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/17361760

or maybe this is Nobama's way of stimulating job growth.

Personally, I prefer the other method, Military Tribunal = 1 bullet a peice....................priceless !

Oh and don't forget about the most recent "Islamic Terrorist"............he'll be recieving skin graphs soon, keeping all those doctors and nurses employed, way to go Nobama...........thats change we can believe in !

Is that under created or saved jobs perhaps? :down: :huh:

 

[joanne]

I can't help but notice that since President Obama's election, that the stock market is heading towards 11,000 as opposed to the 6000 mark that his predecessor had it heading towards.

Now THAT is Change I can definitely believe in !

 

[dapoes]

I can't help but notice that since President Obama's election, that the stock market is heading towards 11,000 as opposed to the 6000 mark that his predecessor had it heading towards.

Now THAT is Change I can definitely believe in !

Yeah? Is that helping out the average joe? I cant help notice that people are still losing their jobs (ala failed stimulus), still loosing their homes (ala failed foreclosure rescue program), and banks are still failing.

FYI: the Dow, the S&P 500, and the NASDAQ are primarily indices of large U.S.-based companies, not main street businesses, more Davos than Chamber of Commerce. These increasingly cosmopolitan firms have been busy globalizing and expanding their operations overseas.


What does that tell you?

If companies participated in foreign markets primarily by exporting U.S.-made goods, this shift would be good news for the U.S. economy and workers. But that's not how it works. In fact, in the months after the global credit meltdown, U.S. exports plummeted. They bottomed in April, at $120.6 billion, and though they have been rising, the August 2009 total is still 20 percent below the August 2008 total. Globalization is changing the way we do business. It's not a matter of U.S. companies exporting goods—burgers, soda, cars, software—made in the United States to Beijing but rather, making goods overseas and selling them overseas.

 

[southwind]

I can't help but notice that since President Obama's election, that the stock market is heading towards 11,000 as opposed to the 6000 mark that his predecessor had it heading towards.

Now THAT is Change I can definitely believe in !

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-d...it-in-pictures/



â– President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
■President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.
■President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care fund.
■President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
■President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
â– President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.

■President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.

Now that's "CHANGE" you can believe in........................if there is any change (jingle,jingle) left in your pockets !

 

[Ed Norton]

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-d...it-in-pictures/



â– President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
■President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.
■President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care fund.
■President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.
■President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already in­creased this spending by 20 percent.
â– President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.

■President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.

Now that's "CHANGE" you can believe in........................if there is any change (jingle,jingle) left in your pockets !

I suppose because Obama is incresing Bush's spending that makes Obama bad. Does that means that Bush's increased spending was good? :blink: :blink:

I'm sooo confused!

 

[southwind]

I think $5 TRILLION is a little more than a mere increase !

My advice to you is to start drinking heavily, 'cause it ain't going to get better until next year !

 

[joanne]

I think $5 TRILLION is a little more than a mere increase !

My advice to you is to start drinking heavily, 'cause it ain't going to get better until next year !

And what (southwind) should we expect to change "next year" ?

 

[southwind]

And what (southwind) should we expect to change "next year" ?

Hopefully the end of the Demorat majority and the end of the Nobama,Reid,Pelosi socialistic project !

Am I the only one who thinks everything that goes on in D.C. is nothing but one big joke, every time they see Al Franken ? :blink:

 

[joanne]

Hopefully the end of the Demorat majority and the end of the Nobama,Reid,Pelosi socialistic project !

Am I the only one who thinks everything that goes on in D.C. is nothing but one big joke, every time they see Al Franken ? :blink:

Personally, I think you have a better chance of hitting the $$$ Lottery, before you see the democrats lose their majority in the house or senate.
I'll concede that they are likely to lose their filibuster proof numbers that they have now, but that will result in Gridlock in Washington for 2010-2011-2012, which can be laid at the feet of the GOP.
Be careful what you wish for.

 

[Seatacus]

Personally, I think you have a better chance of hitting the $$$ Lottery, before you see the democrats lose their majority in the house or senate.

Are you basing this thought on the Dems high approval rating?

Be careful what you wish for.

What else should we wish for? :blink: Should we just give up?

 

[southwind]

Personally, I think you have a better chance of hitting the $$$ Lottery, before you see the democrats lose their majority in the house or senate.
I'll concede that they are likely to lose their filibuster proof numbers that they have now, but that will result in Gridlock in Washington for 2010-2011-2012, which can be laid at the feet of the GOP.
Be careful what you wish for.

I much prefer "GRIDLOCK" compared to the Obomination thats taking place, in D.C. right now !