- Jun 4, 2003
- 5,311
- 587
<_< ------- Just heard, AA/Eagle will get some competition into the Carib! ----- Jet blue to fly into STT, and STX with 100 seat regional jets, twice a day out of SJU starting in Dec.!!!
<_< ------- Just heard, AA/Eagle will get some competition into the Carib! ----- Jet blue to fly into STT, and STX with 100 seat regional jets, twice a day out of SJU starting in Dec.!!!
B6 has been hand in hand with AA on the Carib issue and other domestic routes to follow for some time now.
If you fly out of JFK, the gate's monitors displays AA & jetblue signage - with wording something " like the way to the world".
Why would AA put these Ads up, if they weren't getting a cut from sales at B6?
You are almost entirely correct. But JetBlue mechancis make more than we do. I can't speak for pilots and flight attendants because we don't fly their equipment.Yes, AA people blindly think B6's incursion into AA markets is a good thing.
.
We've seen this story so many times already - AA pleads it can't make it in markets, abandons them, and then signs a codeshare agreement with B6 who rushes in to take over the markets.
.
AA has a codeshare deal with B6 - there is no preferential pricing over what B6 would get selling the seats themselves. AA doesn't get profits on B6's seats. .
.
Their employees make a whole lot less than AA employees, they are non-union, and their profits go to their stockholders.
.
All AA gets is to maintain some sort of presence in markets that it still believes are strategically necessary, even though AA can't make it work for them to fly those routes themselves.
.
AA now wants to get B6 to codeshare on AA int'l routes in order to help replace the business that AA has lost because it cannot maintain a presence in the key domestic markets that are necessary to feed its highly competitive NYC flights.
.
Until/IF AMR has an equity stake in B6, JetBlue is competition to American Airlines. Don't ever forget it.
B6 pilot hourly rates are almost as high as AA hourly rates (comparing A320 to 738) but of course, AA's benefits are much more costly and the B6 pilots are more efficient than the AA pilots. B6 flight attendants, fleet and agents earn much less per hour than comparable AA employees (and, I assume, are more efficient than comparable AA employees).
precisely... AA employees are far better paid in terms of total overall competition and B6 employees work alot harder for less money... which is why B6's CASM is so much lower - which is why AA cannot be competitive with markets in which B6 is the price leader. While strategically necessary, AA has no choice but to exit the markets - and the next best option is to turn around and then codeshare on its competititor, even though that competitor drove AA out of those markets.B6 pilot hourly rates are almost as high as AA hourly rates (comparing A320 to 738) but of course, AA's benefits are much more costly and the B6 pilots are more efficient than the AA pilots. B6 flight attendants, fleet and agents earn much less per hour than comparable AA employees (and, I assume, are more efficient than comparable AA employees).
More efficient than a new AA part time FSC earning a few shekels above minimum wage?
Someone please stop this "broken record!" Again and again, bla, bla, bla! We have heard it over and over. Go play somewhere else!precisely... AA employees are far better paid in terms of total overall competition and B6 employees work alot harder for less money... which is why B6's CASM is so much lower - which is why AA cannot be competitive with markets in which B6 is the price leader. While strategically necessary, AA has no choice but to exit the markets - and the next best option is to turn around and then codeshare on its competititor, even though that competitor drove AA out of those markets.
.
If AA can find a business model that allows them to succeed by leaving lower cost domestic flying to other carriers with whom they can partner - even if it is on a competitive basis since two domestic carriers cannot share revenue or have anti-trust immunity - allowing AA to focus on more lucrative long haul markets, then AA can win.
.
But other network carriers remain in markets which AA has to leave because of its costs and AA has only been able to maintain capacity by redeploying it to DFW and MIA which have traditionally been less competitive. Now that competition in ORD is increasing rapidly and AA is facing more and more competition even in N. Texas which will; culminate in a couple years with reworking of the Wright Amendment, the concept is less certain that AA can maintain a global network without being able to maintain its own presence in key US markets, many of which are now dubbed as part of AA's cornerstone strategy.