The president has a clandestine network targeting a 'kill list' justified by secret laws. How is that different than a death squad?
http://www.guardian....ecret-assassins
http://www.guardian....ecret-assassins
Judge Overrules Censors in Guantánamo 9/11 Hearing
During the censored portion, according to the transcript, David Nevin, a defense lawyer, was discussing whether arguments over a motion “will turn out to be closed or secret” regarding the preservation of evidence “at a detention facility,” an issue he said was “a critical matter to Mr. Mohammed” and “central to the case as far as he is concerned.”
The lawyers then became aware that a red light had gone on, indicating that the courtroom had been closed. But the button in the courtroom had not been hit by the only previously known censor, a security officer who sits near the judge, Col. James Pohl of the Army.
Mr. Nevin was apparently referring to the Central Intelligence Agency’s secret prisons in countries like Romania and Thailand where the agency once held the Sept. 11 defendants; the defense plans to argue that its clients should be spared execution because the C.I.A. tortured them. But Mr. Nevin did not mention such details, and his motion “to preserve evidence at any existing detention facility” was unclassified, Colonel Pohl said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/us/politics/transcript-of-guantanamo-hearing-points-to-outside-censors.html?_r=0
Broadwell confirmed the reports on Fox News that the CIA annex asked for a special unit, the Commander in Chief’s In Extremis Force, to come and assist it. She also said that the force could indeed have reinforced the consulate, and that Petraeus knew all of this, but was not allowed to talk to the press because of his position in the CIA.
“The challenge has been the fog of war, and the greater challenge is that it’s political hunting season, and so this whole thing has been turned into a very political sort of arena, if you will,” she said. “The fact that came out today is that the ground forces there at the CIA annex, which is different from the consulate, were requesting reinforcements.
“They were requesting the – it’s called the C-in-C’s In Extremis Force – a group of Delta Force operators, our very, most talented guys we have in the military. They could have come and reinforced the consulate and the CIA annex. Now, I don’t know if a lot of you have heard this but the CIA annex had actually taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner, and they think that the attack on the consulate was an attempt to get these prisoners back. It’s still being vetted.
http://www.humanevents.com/2012/11/12/paula-broadwell-revealed-secret-benghazi-prison-video/
OK, let me pretend to be a liberal here !
"FEAR MONGER!"
Obama argues his assassination program is a “state secret”
At this point, I didn’t believe it was possible, but the Obama administration has just reached an all-new low in its abysmal civil liberties record. In response to the lawsuit filed by Anwar Awlaki’s father asking a court to enjoin the President from assassinating his son, a U.S. citizen, without any due process, the administration late last night, according to The Washington Post, filed a brief asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit without hearing the merits of the claims. That’s not surprising: both the Bush and Obama administrations have repeatedly insisted that their secret conduct is legal but nonetheless urge courts not to even rule on its legality. But what’s most notable here is that one of the arguments the Obama DOJ raises to demand dismissal of this lawsuit is “state secrets”: in other words, not only does the President have the right to sentence Americans to death with no due process or charges of any kind, but his decisions as to who will be killed and why he wants them dead are “state secrets,” and thus no court may adjudicate their legality.
If the President has the power to order American citizens killed with no due process, and to do so in such complete secrecy that no courts can even review his decisions, then what doesn’t he have the power to do?
And now, in this case, Obama uses this secrecy and immunity weapon not to shield Bush lawlessness from judicial review, but his own.
http://www.salon.com/2010/09/25/secrecy_7/
Wow, nice find about the CIA prisons in Eastern Europe!Anybody notice this:
OK, let me pretend to be a liberal here !
"FEAR MONGER!"
Wow, nice find about the CIA prisons in Eastern
What I find amazing is that our friends on the right have a concern for their Muslim brothers.
Should my first post here be about politics? I suppose. Hi everyone!
All I'll say is that it's hard to expect a president to eliminate America's enemies when you simultaneously condemn the extent to which he eliminates them. People want to be safe from terror, but they don't want people to die, they don't want people going to Guantanamo. I'm a liberal, so we'll get that out in the open. I find the notion of a kill list reprehensible, and I won't attempt to justify it. All I'm saying is that conservatives blast Obama for being too soft on the Middle East, but then they're outraged when he kills terrorists. You can't really have it both ways.
Southwind, Barack only has one R. And I'll be a conservative for a second: The government/terrorists/poor people are coming to get me!
NIce first post there buffs...
Hopefully not sarcasm. I just registered and that was the first post I saw, so I figured I'd jump in.