Oil Prices $65 A Barrel.

boy if Allan Greenspan says that the economy is doing well, then why did all the employees at USAIR get either laid off and or paycuts and the execs continue to fatten their already fattened wallets? Greenspan must be smoking something to say that our economy is doing well.
 
See that's the problem. You're missing it.

Alan Greenspan says the economy is doing well because "the execs continue to fatten their already fattened wallets".

You've got to pay better attention. It isn't that reducing our wages is irrelevant. It's intregal to the process of "his" model of the economy. Why do you think the governent is so inattentive about guest workers, competing for our jobs, and driving our wages down. It's part of the plan for their economy, not ours.
 
repeet said:
See that's the problem. You're missing it.

Alan Greenspan says the economy is doing well because "the execs continue to fatten their already fattened wallets".

You've got to pay better attention. It isn't that reducing our wages is irrelevant. It's intregal to the process of "his" model of the economy. Why do you think the governent is so inattentive about guest workers, competing for our jobs, and driving our wages down. It's part of the plan for their economy, not ours.
[post="287434"][/post]​

Exactly! "The economy" isn't the monolithic entity many assume it is. It's really whose economy is where the distinction needs to be made. Connect the dots of shennanagins past and it's all so clear. The monied elite's "yeaahhh welll...." type concessions to the issue to the erosion of the middle class is about as much contrition as you'll get from them; That, and the crocodile tears they'll glibly shed as they say sorry you're getting rained on, even as they urinate on you.

"Guest workers"....global this and that...."you can't put the genie back in the bottle...". <_< Yeah right, such an unstoppable force of nature we just need to react to...be "competitive" and all that jazz. That it's great for the quarterlies is just a coincidence ;)
 
You can't blame a failed business model on the economy... A good business manger will conform his business model to fit the economic environment. Thats exactly what UAir has, well at least has tried to do.

Big time corporate leaders are going to make more money than you, because well, they have influence, power, and knowledge. If you have none of that, you will never make their kind of bread they do. Dont be jealous... Don't hate the player, hate the game. Be pissed at yourself because you dont have the drive, motivation,or smarts to be THE MAN. You dont get to the top by accident.
 
usair_begins_with_u said:
You can't blame a failed business model on the economy... A good business manger will conform his business model to fit the economic environment. Thats exactly what UAir has, well at least has tried to do.

Big time corporate leaders are going to make more money than you, because well, they have influence, power, and knowledge. If you have none of that, you will never make their kind of bread they do. Dont be jealous... Don't hate the player, hate the game. Be pissed at yourself because you dont have the drive, motivation,or smarts to be THE MAN. You dont get to the top by accident.
[post="287513"][/post]​


Exellent statement!!!


SoftLanding
 
I don't think it's so simple. The following from the Christian Science Moniter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rich-poor gap gaining attention

A remark by Greenspan symbolizes concern that wealth disparities may destabilize the economy.

By Peter Grier | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON – The income gap between the rich and the rest of the US population has become so wide, and is growing so fast, that it might eventually threaten the stability of democratic capitalism itself.
Is that a liberal's talking point? Sure. But it's also a line from the recent public testimony of a champion of the free market: Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

America's powerful central banker hasn't suddenly lurched to the left of Democratic National Committee chief Howard Dean. His solution is better education today to create a flexible workforce for tomorrow - not confiscation of plutocrats' yachts.

But the fact that Mr. Greenspan speaks about this topic at all may show how much the growing concentration of national wealth at the top, combined with the uncertainties of increased globalization, worries economic policymakers as they peer into the future.

"He is the conventional wisdom," says Jared Bernstein, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank. "When I'm arguing with people, I say, 'Even Alan Greenspan....' "

Greenspan's comments at a Joint Economic Committee hearing last week were typical, for him. Asked a leading question by Sen. Jack Reed (D) of Rhode Island, he agreed that over the past two quarters hourly wages have shown few signs of accelerating. Overall employee compensation has gone up - but mostly due to a surge in bonuses and stock-option exercises.

The Fed chief than added that the 80 percent of the workforce represented by nonsupervisory workers has recently seen little, if any, income growth at all. The top 20 percent of supervisory, salaried, and other workers has.

The result of this, said Greenspan, is that the US now has a significant divergence in the fortunes of different groups in its labor market. "As I've often said, this is not the type of thing which a democratic society - a capitalist democratic society - can really accept without addressing," Greenspan told the congressional hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the Good Book says where your heart is, your treasure is, also.

Exactly how much treasure is being directed towards Greenspan's solution, education for furloughed workers?

As a furloughee, I can personally testify - very little.

And, one such program, the Workplace Investment Act, just got it's budget slashed - in our area, 60%. Why, when according to Greenspan, the economy is doing well?

But somehow, while we can't subsidize the public for an admitted need, we CAN dole out the cash to corporations.

http://www.progress.org/banneker/cw.html

http://www.pww.org/past-weeks-1999/Corporate%20welfare.htm

(I recommend you read everything by Bartlett and Steele you can get your hands on).

http://blog.ntu.org/main/post.php?post_id=479
 
for our society to continue to be healthy and even VAGUELY familiar to those of us that grew up in the 50s and 60s, we need to be aware of some key disparities (not niceties and luxuries)

health care (especially $$ spent at the end of life)

housing (really more about security from crime and disease)

opportunity for your children (really about an education system that provides opportunity for upward mobility for all)

without these securities more and more people are going to be acting VERY defensively in their life choices, making our society harsher, LESS efficient, less pleasant and diverse culturally (cuz nobody is going to be willing to risk not having resources and doing something off the wall) and more segmented.

Just look at what kinds of insecurities parents are beginning to instill in their children about their educations and their futures.