Quite an article

Boeingguy

Member
Nov 22, 2002
47
0
http://www.suntimes.com/output/business/cs...tml



Clash in the cockpit

April 13, 2003

United Airlines secretly paid $40 million in cash on Nov. 20, 1989, to a shell corporation run by the leaders of its pilots' union, a payment that forestalled what would have been a drastic, damaging holiday slowdown of the airline.

If the payment wasn't illegal, it was at least unethical, and has infected the airline's operations right through the sale of the airline to its employees in 1994, according to a forthcoming book, The Shame of the Friendly Skies, by Paul H. Weaver, former assistant managing editor of Fortune magazine. The Sun-Times is running an excerpt from the book in two parts; the first part appears today and the second will run in the Business section on Monday.

The book documents a history of mismanagement, blind greed and hatred that characterized labor and management during United's history. At one level, the book is the story of how employee ownership came to a great corporation and union. At another level, it is the story of a secret process of corruption that wormed its way inside the United Airlines master executive council of the Air Line Pilots Association, top management of the company and the cause of employee ownership itself.

Nowhere was that bitterness and corruption more acute than in the face-to-face battle between United Capt. Rick Dubinsky, the charismatic and manic head of the United pilots' union, and Stephen Wolf, the United CEO who presided over the creation of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

This excerpt from Weaver's book begins in June 1987, just after the board fired CEO Dick Ferris, whose vision of the company as an airline (United), car-rental outfit (Hertz) and hotel (Hilton and Westin) company went so awry that it provoked an outside corporate raider to force the sale of the non-airline operations. Ferris' strategy also annoyed the hot-headed Dubinsky, because it short-circuited his scheme to buy the airline through its unions. But only for a few years.

How the pilots first tried to seize control of United Airlines, and how that struggle has tainted the airline and its unions ever since.


In the hours after (former CEO Dick) Ferris' departure, the disciplined face (pilots union leader Rick) Dubinsky had shown an often impressed Wall Street seemed to crumble, and an angry, whining note began to echo in his words and actions. He sounded less like the thrilled victor in a historic battle against a scary anti-union offensive, and more like a sore loser for whom corporate ownership itself and the personal glory, power, or wealth it would bring had been, or become, the real objectives.

Years later, over my tape recorder, Dubinsky was still furious at the long-gone CEO and still dissatisfied over the mildness of his fate.

Dubinsky: I wish there'd be some way to visit the pain on [Ferris] that he visited on the pilots.... Humiliation isn't good enough for him. He should be financially ruined as well.

Dubinsky immediately squared off against interim CEO Frank Olson, too.

(In June, 1987), the board officially buried Dubinsky's buyout. It formally rejected the pilots' proposal as underpriced and unfinanced. It also authorized an extraordinary dividend of $55 per share, to be funded by selling the nonairline businesses and by borrowing several hundred million dollars against the assets of the airline that would remain.

In other words, to appease (disgruntled shareholders who were tempted to ally themselves with Dubinsky and the pilots' union), the board decided not only to de-diversify and de-capitalize the airline, but also to load it up with fresh debt. It thereby sharply reduced the pilots' ability to buy the airline by leveraging it, buying security from a takeover at the price of limiting the airline's ability to take on debt to modernize equipment or expand the route structure.

Meanwhile, Dubinsky got to work putting the heat on--and venting his frustration with--the other two unions (the flight attendants and machinists, which opposed Dubinsky's takeover bid).

He castigated flight attendant president Pat Friend's opposition to employee ownership as cruel stupidity, campaigned against a contract she had negotiated while it was out for a ratification vote by the flight attendant rank and file, and expressed a growing personal rage at the unmovable Friend with epithets and put-downs, of which the following joke is a mild example:

Q. What's the difference between a terrorist and a flight attendant with PMS?

A. You can negotiate with the terrorist.

Dubinsky also put the screws to the machinists with tactics ranging from a polite invitation to join the pilots' buyout at a meeting in August, to an extortionate threat that the pilots, once in power, would sell the huge San Francisco jet maintenance base, which employed about a third of the union's membership at UAL, if John Peterpaul, international vice president of the International Association of Machinists, didn't hurry up and become a member in good standing of the pilots' new company ownership club. The formidable Peterpaul, whose Lodge 141 was the largest and oldest labor group at UAL with roughly 30,000 members, told Dubinsky to get lost.

At the same time the board drove a stake through the heart of the pilots' buyout ambitions, however, it also gave Dubinsky new hope for a buyout by appointing Stephen M. Wolf to take over from Olson as United's permanent CEO.

For Rick Dubinsky, the arrival at United of a new boss who had made his name by selling airlines to pilots (Republic Airlines and Flying Tigers Airlines) was a godsend. It meant that, potentially at least, the United pilots' buyout crusade had a powerful new ally at the top. It offered new hope that the board's bitter opposition to pilot ownership might fade or be overcome.

The stage was set for a friendly meeting that could mark the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

(No such luck. At their first meeting in Chicago, Dubinsky felt insulted when Wolf failed to greet him as Captain Dubinsky, but he invited Wolf to address the Master Executive Council of the pilots' union in Kona, Hawaii, a few weeks later. Wolf felt Dubinsky mocked him at that meeting in a variety of petty ways, such as providing a microphone stand that was too short for Wolf's tall frame so he looked stooped. But he also met privately with Dubinsky, who asserted the pilots would work with Wolf to take control of the airline.)

After Kona, the pattern of public abuse and private courting continued.

The pilots continued to put Wolf down. There was word-of-mouth slander--Wolf was ashamed of his height, pilot leaders said, he always seemed to stand bent over. Wolf must have a bad body image, they observed; why else would the man constantly fiddle with his clothes? Wolf was light in the loafers, they sniggered; they heard from their spies that the guy had a barber chair in his bedroom. Wolf didn't really care about his job, they buzzed; he had no intention of staying with the airline for the long haul. Not that he was much of an executive in the first place, they hinted. Any monkey could do what Wolf is doing, Dubinsky once scoffed into the union's dial-up codaphone message service for the rank and file.

The comments were offensive, Wolf conceded in our interviews. He seemed particularly steamed at the any-monkey-could-do-it crack.

But Wolf held his tongue, turned the other cheek, and continued to meet with Dubinsky to discuss the company's lack of interest in a transaction and the latest twists in the pilots' pursuit of one.

A few months after the Kona meeting, Wolf attended a top-secret get-together with Dubinsky in a Chicago hotel in which Dubinsky formally invited Wolf to join the pilots in a leveraged buyout of the airline. After the deal was consummated, he added, Wolf would be welcome to stay on as CEO. William R. Howard, the former chief executive of Piedmont Airlines, whom Dubinsky had hired as chairman of Airline Acquisition Corp., the pilots' takeover vehicle, to give the pilots' ambitions credibility, would be let go.

Wolf, still not fully accustomed to the game in which Dubinsky in public insults the CEO whom in private he is wooing to sell the pilots the airline, had a momentary lapse from his policy of being realistic and turning the other cheek and doing the more productive thing.

How do you comport this request with what you said yesterday? he asked.

What's that? Dubinsky asked.

Yesterday's codaphone.

I didn't record the codaphone, Dubinsky retorted.

Rick, stop, stop. You're the chairman of the union, you're running the union, you know what the codaphone says, and if you didn't draft it or say it, it's certainly with your concurrence. And your own words are less than pleasant, most assuredly. I'm not trying to suggest why or trying to cause you to change. I'm merely asking, how do you comport your request that I run the business with your full support and concurrence while you are maligning me on a daily basis in such a malicious fashion? I mean, what do you do about the pilots?

Oh, we can fix that instantly, Dubinsky said breezily. We just turn it off and send out a new message, and in a couple of days it will have been corrected.

In time Wolf accepted the pattern. The trashing was not meant personally, he told himself.

Personally, privately, the pilots knew that Wolf was an excellent executive doing a fine job, growing the airline and speeding the rate at which pilots moved up the title-and-pay hierarchy. But they had to say bad things about him in public to make the adversarial politics inside the union that would get the deal done.

(Although Dubinsky's scheme to buy the airline in 1989 was scuttled when the board fired Dick Ferris and loaded up the company with debt), it so happened that the just-exploded deal left Dubinsky holding a killer hand.

As an earnest expression of its good faith the previous month, the pilots union had given the company two interim contract concessions effective upon the signing of the deal:

**An increase in the ceiling on an individual pilot's flying time from 81 hours per month to 84 hours.

* A (two-tier) wage schedule to enable the company to fly its growing new fleet of 747-400s with union pilots.

The terms went on to provide, however, that should the deal fail to close, these interim concessions would snap back to the original levels on 30 days' notice. This latter provision had been suggested by Gene Keilin, the pilot's hand-picked investment banker at Lazard Freres on Wall Street.

The company's schedulers immediately incorporated the changes into the airline's operating plans, beginning with the October schedule. UAL thereby received an instant boost in productivity, but put itself at risk for the month that followed. November is the industry's peak traffic period, containing both the massively busy Wednesday before Thanksgiving and the travel-saturated Sunday after Thanksgiving, when capacity at every airline is stretched to the limit and virtually every able-bodied pilot and serviceable airplane is hard at work.

The fact that the airline's resources are stretched tight in the last days of November, combined with the pilots' ability to trigger the snap-back on 30 days' notice, gave Dubinsky a weapon of enormous power, and he now proceeded to fire it.

Ten days after the 1989 deal cratered, Dubinsky notified Wolf of the pilots' intent to cancel both concessions effective Wednesday, Nov. 22, the day before Thanksgiving.

The sudden disappearance of the extra flying hours during Thanksgiving week and toward the end of the month meant that on Nov. 22, some pilots, having already flown 81 hours, would immediately go illegal--that is, have the right under the contract to refuse any further flying for the rest of the month. The airline, having scheduled itself to the max, would have no extra personnel to assign in their place.

With each passing day the manpower crunch would worsen. By the Sunday after Thanksgiving, a significant part of UAL figured to be shut down.

Dubinsky proceeded to make United an offer it couldn't refuse.

He proposed to buy the company at a lower price the banks could finance.

Under the terms of this proposal, Wolf would be replaced with a new CEO of the pilots' choosing when the new owners took over.

In addition, management would negotiate an immediate amendment to the pilots' contract giving the pilots a bonus of $54 million.

Last but not least, the company would pay $47 million to Airline Acquisition Corp., the pilots' acquisition vehicle, as compensation for damages suffered when an earlier buyout proposal it had made had failed as a result of some anti-takeover provisions in United's contract with the International Association of Machinists.

If the company accepted the pilots' terms by 4 p.m. on Monday, Nov. 20, Dubinsky informed Wolf, the union would waive its right to cancel the 84-hour ceiling, and UAL would be able to fly Thanksgiving week as scheduled. If, however, the pilots' demands were not met, Dubinsky would send the pilots a mailgram announcing that the cap on flying time would revert to 81 hours as of 12:01 a.m., Wednesday, Nov. 22.

The Thanksgiving schedule would be devastated.

The board of directors was aghast. What Dubinsky was talking about was blackmail--it was extortion--in fact, some of it might very well be a crime.

The owners and officers of Airline Acquisition were members of the pilots union leadership, and company payments to union leaders are a felony under federal law. The directors might be opening themselves up to prosecution if they did what the pilot leader proposed.

But Dubinsky had the company over a barrel, and everyone knew it.

Wolf and the board promptly--and in the case of the board, at least, reluctantly--caved in.
 

Segue

Senior
Oct 31, 2002
276
0
www.usaviation.com
----------------
On 4/14/2003 9:06:29 AM ua767fo wrote:

Dubinsky was a great labor leader. He's already sorely missed. Ousted before is retirement by 'children' on the UAL MEC.

Denver, CO

----------------​

If that kind of behavior is the characteristics of "a great labor leader" then I guess I'm speechless.....

More like a North Korean dictator.
 

ua767fo

Senior
Aug 30, 2002
252
3
Dubinsky was a great labor leader. He''s already sorely missed. Ousted before is retirement by ''children'' on the UAL MEC.

Denver, CO
 
Aug 20, 2002
1,423
90
Valhalla
www.usaviation.com
Here is part two:

BY PAUL H. WEAVER


Lawyers on both sides scrambled to make the huge payoff legal.

Initially they accomplished this transformation primarily by defining the payment as damages suffered by Airline Acquisition Corp., the pilots'' acquisition vehicle, when their 1988 buyout proposal failed as a result of the "poison pill" provision in the machinists'' labor contract. They would make the company''s check payable to the order of Gene Keilin, the pilots'' investment banker and adviser. Formerly with Lazard Freres, Keilin started his own investment banking firm, Keilin & Bloom, after the 1989 blowup.

The lawyers reasoned that whereas a payment directly to Acquisition, owned by the pilot leadership, might well cross the law''s bright line, no one was going to make a fuss over a fee paid to Acquisition''s banker, even one who had just had a sudden and obscure parting of the ways with his distinguished employer.

(United pilots union leader Rick) Dubinsky designated Chuck Goldstein, the United pilots'' staff attorney, to take possession of the checks if and when they arrived at the pilots'' offices by the 4 p.m. deadline. Joining Goldstein at the office that day was union vice chairman Steve Smith, whom Dubinsky put in charge of sending the mailgram which would be sent to pilots instructing them to refuse to fly beyond their contractual hours.

The plan was that the two of them would be in phone contact with Dubinsky throughout the day. When the money arrived--or at 4 p.m. if it had not materialized by then--Goldstein would relay the fact to Dubinsky, and depending on what had transpired, the master chairman would give Smith the word to send or withhold the mailgram.

Dubinsky himself would be ostentatiously Elsewhere, establishing a presumption that he was Doing Other Things.

Should he ever be faced with embarrassing questions about the secret payoff, being absent from the office and having delegated Goldstein and Smith to deal with the checks and mailgram would give him a record of action tending to support a recollection that he was completely uninvolved in the money side of things.

A few minutes before 4 o''clock, the money still had not arrived.

"What happens now?" Smith asked Goldstein. "It''s three minutes to four. I''m all set to launch the telegram."

Just then Paul George, United''s senior vice president for labor relations, entered the office and sat down, briefcase in hand.

"I''ve got the checks," he said. "But there are some things we have to understand."

"Rick is going to call me in two minutes," Goldstein said. "If I don''t say I have the checks in my hands, he''s going to say, ''Send the mailgram.''"

George opened his briefcase, took out two checks, and handed them to Goldstein.

One of the checks was in the amount of $16 million and made payable to the United Pilots'' ESOP Initiative Fund. Provided for in the public documentation of the deal, this was money Dubinsky had demanded while negotiating the transaction to replenish the $14 million fund nearly exhausted by more than two years of campaigning for a buyout.

The other check, for $47 million, was payable to Gene Keilin.

Goldstein looked the checks over carefully. They were drawn on a North Carolina bank and signed by an appropriate corporate official. The correct amounts and payees were entered in the correct spaces. Everything appeared to be in order.

Dubinsky''s call rang through while Goldstein was studying the documents. Goldstein put him on the speaker phone.

"Yes or no?" Dubinsky asked.

"Yes," Goldstein answered. "Paul''s here."

Dubinsky and George exchanged greetings. Then Dubinsky told Goldstein that inasmuch as everything seemed to be in order, he could tell Smith not to send the mailgram. The senior staff attorney acknowledged, and hung up.

Immediately George leaned over and grabbed the checks out of Goldstein''s fingers and laid them on the coffee table.

"There are some things we have to understand first," he said.

But the conditions were no problem. George merely wanted Goldstein''s personal word in addition to the assurances he had already received that in exchange for the payments, the pilots were indeed going to fly airplanes on Wednesday.

The banks were already closed, so Goldstein took the checks home with him that night. The next day he deposited the smaller of the two to the account of the ESOP Initiative Fund. The other he surrendered to Gene Keilin in person.

Within days, the pilots were enjoying a $54 million bonus, and Dubinsky''s representatives were negotiating a new agreement to buy the airline at a lower price. The pilots were soon joined by the other two unions at United, the machinists and flight attendants, in organizing a new buyout vehicle, named the United Employees Acquisition Corp.

In April, 1990 UAL and UAEC executed the documentation for a buyout at $208 a share.

At the urging of the company''s lawyers, the secret payment to Acquisition''s banker was scaled back to $40 million, and redefined as a "topping fee" in the documentation of this new agreement.

In the lexicon of investment banking, a topping fee is a fee paid to a losing bidder whose losing bid prompted another bidder to make a higher, winning bid; it compensates the losing bidder for the value he has created for the company and its shareholders in raising the transaction price.

As applied to the secret $40 million payoff, the use of the term was a stretch, since the three-union deal was done at a price below what Acquisition had been slated to pay.

But as a new terminological fig leaf drawn over what remained an intrinsically dubious action, it was arguably an improvement. Where the old theory had represented the payoff as something United owed to a company owned and run by pilot union leaders, the new one drew attention instead to the machinations that led to the three-union buyout of UAL Inc.

So where did the $40 million go? Who got it? Where is the money today?

I do not know. The official parties to the huge payoff refused my requests for interviews and information on the subject. I was able to gain access to none of the confidential legal, company, union, financial, and tax records that would cast light on the question.

But although I cannot state with certain knowledge who got the money, it is nevertheless possible to say something meaningful about what probably happened on the basis of the familiar courtroom tests of opportunity, means, and motive.

There are two possibilities here:

* Keilin kept all the money himself.

* He shared it with others. If he shared it, he could have done so with people who had a legitimate claim to a share (as Lazard Freres might have), or he could have shared with people without a lawful claim, such as the pilot leaders.

This last scenario is obviously the important one, for circumstantial evidence and common sense suggest that the pilot leadership may very well have forced Keilin to share the $40 million.

Dubinsky and his associates had the means to force Keilin to kick back by making the kickback a condition of his receiving the company''s payment in the first place. If Keilin refused the request, Dubinsky could prevent him from getting so much as dime one of the $40 million simply by telling (CEO Stephen) Wolf he no longer insisted on the payment after all, or by telling Goldstein not to pass the company''s check on to Keilin.

In the second place, Dubinsky and his associates had the motive to demand a kickback--a desire for material gain. The national union, which had made a point of positioning itself as the venture investor and as such was presumably entitled to the lion''s share of any money generated by the takeover campaign, was in dire financial straits in the mid- to late-1980s.

As for the United pilot leaders personally, the key figures appear to have had a lively personal interest in amassing material wealth. (Dubinsky''s very substantial net worth already has been considered.) Roger Hall at age 50, according to filings in the Hall v. Hall divorce case of 1990, had a family net worth of $2.5 million, or $1 million above and beyond the Hall''s residence and pension assets.

Third, Dubinsky''s personality was consistent with the act of demanding a kickback. It is hard to imagine an ambitious, domineering man like him, having already authorized a $22 million banking fee for Keilin, going to the trouble, and putting himself and the union at legal risk, to force UAL Inc. to pay Keilin an additional $40 million without arranging for some of the benefit to be shared with the union and/or others. Indeed, it is hard to imagine any rational person of almost any personality makeup exerting himself and taking risks to force a payment that he or his organization will receive no share of.

Even if Keilin kept all the money and kicked back none of it in any form, the secret $40 million payoff is still a critical event in the history of the pilot buyout at United Airlines.

For one thing, it demarcates a subtle but crucial turning point in the pilots'' crusade for employee ownership of the friendly skies. Previously, the buyout had been driven primarily by the drive for self-preservation in the face of Richard Ferris'' sophisticated, potentially lethal threat to the union''s power and existence.

That purpose faded into irrelevance after Ferris was fired, the diversification strategy was dismantled, and Wolf was brought on to run United. And whatever remained of it was obliterated by the events of 1989, when UAL buried the pilots'' buyout scheme under a load of new debt.

The payoff marks the point at which the buyout ceased being driven by union leaders standing and defending their core mission, and started being pushed forward by middleman avid for the huge fees available, managers lured by the goal of lowering labor costs, and both corporate executives and union leaders attracted by the personal advantages that could be derived.

In the year that followed, the pilots union seemed to close out the books on the employee ownership project. It ratified a new contract, featuring a 31 percent raise, which was generous, but still only brought the United pilots'' compensation up to the level at other major airlines.

In the summer of 1991 the (master executive council of the union) narrowly failed to muster the two-thirds majority required to relax the constitutional provision that prohibited Dubinsky from running for re-election in the fall, as he wanted to.

In October, with an angry Dubinsky throwing the votes he controlled to his old ally Roger Hall, Hall by a one-vote margin regained the master chairmanship. Dubinsky stepped down, and Hall returned amid the widespread expectation that the pilots and United were at last heading into a period of smooth sailing and easy living.
 
Sep 5, 2002
12
0
----------------
On 4/14/2003 9:06:29 AM ua767fo wrote:

Dubinsky was a great labor leader. He''s already sorely missed. Ousted before is retirement by ''children'' on the UAL MEC.

Denver, CO

----------------​
Dubinsky is partly responsable for the mess that United is in. Recall the infamous "strangle the golden goose" quote from him.

The book should be interesting reading. If United goes Ch 7, I''m sure more books are to follow.

FF
 
Aug 20, 2002
1,423
90
Valhalla
www.usaviation.com
Dubinsky was a classic! I most enjoyed his "choke the golden goose" line, but he is one of those people (like Jesse Jackson) who is most happy when they''re outside pissing on the tent yelling to be allowed entry.

If you bring ''em inside the tent they don''t know what to do.
 

atabuy

Senior
Oct 13, 2002
419
0
I was always under the impression that wolf was to blame for the ESOP.
No wonder the new culture never materialized. The whole thing was built on deceit.

Oviously we were all duped by Dubinski.
 

Segue

Senior
Oct 31, 2002
276
0
www.usaviation.com
----------------
On 4/15/2003 10:31:38 AM wts54 wrote:

The esop scam was only about finding a way for the pilots
to ever increase their pay and benefits at other peoples
expense.It was a scam from the get go.

----------------​

At everyone else''s expense - the shareholders, the other employee groups, and the flying public. Worse yet, Dubinsky was able to pin the blame on "management". Let the truth be known!
 

ual747mech

Senior
Nov 26, 2002
279
0
Now I know why Goodwin caved in to the pilots demands. Dubinsky made that happen. Goodwin, like others before him, was afraid of Dubinsky. Dubinsky must've been schooled by the Mafia
9.gif
 

Segue

Senior
Oct 31, 2002
276
0
www.usaviation.com
----------------
On 4/15/2003 4:28:43 PM ual747mech wrote:

Now I know why Goodwin caved in to the pilots demands. Dubinsky made that happen. Goodwin, like others before him, was afraid of Dubinsky. Dubinsky must''ve been schooled by the Mafia

----------------​

After the "summer of love", Goodwin was backed into a corner and had no option.
 

ual747mech

Senior
Nov 26, 2002
279
0
----------------
On 4/15/2003 4:56:43 PM Segue wrote:

----------------
On 4/15/2003 4:28:43 PM ual747mech wrote:

Now I know why Goodwin caved in to the pilots demands. Dubinsky made that happen. Goodwin, like others before him, was afraid of Dubinsky. Dubinsky must''ve been schooled by the Mafia

----------------​

After the "summer of love", Goodwin was backed into a corner and had no option.

----------------​
Because Goodwin knew Dubinsky had this tool(mailgram) in his hand but couldn''t prove it. This is taken from the article above: "Rick is going to call me in two minutes," Goldstein said. "If I don''t say I have the checks in my hands, he''s going to say, ''Send the mailgram.''" Dubinsky used that to tell his pilots to slow down, cancel, and other things to disrupt the operation. He used it and created the "Summer of Hell 2000" until Goodwin caved in.
 

Old Dog

Newbie
Aug 19, 2002
5
0
www.usaviation.com
ual747mech...
This article refers primarily to events that took place in 1989 - the conversation you quote between Goldstein and Dubinsky re the mailgram took place Nov 20 1989. The mailgram was never sent because the checks were turned over. Are we reading the same article or did I miss a turn someplace?
Old Dog
 

Latest posts