Okay, two years ago all the unions came to an agreement with the company that, in exchange for Concessions Round 1, we would not be asked again for more givebacks. In walks Bonehead... okay, we were ordered to accept another round, not "asked".
Now, the company is asking a third time. My question is why would the original agreements not to ask for abrogation of the contracts under 1113 not be binding on the company now? It seems to me that absent specific language to the contrary (i.e., this agrement is only binding on US Airways for one year) tha the agreement would still hold. Have the respective unions attorneys looked into argument as even a possibility?
Now, the company is asking a third time. My question is why would the original agreements not to ask for abrogation of the contracts under 1113 not be binding on the company now? It seems to me that absent specific language to the contrary (i.e., this agrement is only binding on US Airways for one year) tha the agreement would still hold. Have the respective unions attorneys looked into argument as even a possibility?