Again, thanks for your support. From what I'm reading, it seems the airlines are playing one union against another, would that be an accurate assessment?
Yes, and No. The TWU, IAM and IBT are playing the members off each other too. They have been doing this for many years now. Thats why they hate AMFA so much. AMFA came in and got mechanics precident setting increases.
Each union is willing to give concessions in the hope that "their company" will be the surviving powerhouse airline. Once the others go out of business then the union at the surviving airline will get more members.
Don't you think it's time put differences aside for the time being while there's an all-out assault on our professions?
Yes, if they are willing to take action. Their unwillingness to take action is one difference that obviously can not be put aside. Dont you agree?
AFA, especially US and UAL, is entering some uncharted territory. Both carriers being in BK, both carriers asking for the courts to void their contracts and deciding whether the RLA or the BK court takes precedence. The judge handling UAL has sent the company and union back to the table and told them to "work it out" between themselves. I imagine the judge sees the huge implications any decision he makes would have on the entire industry. It could put Bush into an uncomfortable position, if he has to order a PEB.
And if there is a PEB we should ignore it unless given some assurances. This would be uncharted territry for many of us but the labor movement was born in civil disobedience. The conditions that pushed the leaders of the early labor movement have been put back in place over time by uncontested judicial "legislation". When an immoral law is put in place it is our moral duty to violate it. When labor laws were put in place compromises were made, to have a judge come along and compromise the compromise is unacceptable.
Whatever the outcome for AFA, it will affect every airline employee at every airline, including those not represented by a collective bargaining unit. If there is a "bad outcome" for AFA, why would anyone want a union? If contracts can be so easily discarded, why pay union dues? The AFL-CIO will lose its "cut" at a time when less than 12% of Labor has union representation. Sweeney needs to wake up and take a stand.
No arguement there.
"Herding cats", I loved that statement! Of course everyone has an opinion! That's what being a good leader is all about. Union leadership needs to make its membership understand the old saying "An Injury to One is An Injury To All." Never has this been a truer statement.
That was Jim Littles latest excuse to TWU Local 562 as to why there has been no public support for the AFA from the TWU.
I don't understand why we all remain so passive. Our leadership should be organizing writing campaigns to legislators. Our pensions are being stolen while we are buying into the corporate drivel that pensions are a thing of the past! But, as you will note, their pensions are protected in "bullet proof" clauses!
Are our leaders pensions at risk? Have they taken paycuts? Can they be held accountable? With the TWU we can not vote out International officials. That is why accountable Local Presidents are speaking up but the International is not.
We don't have time to waste. Call, e mail *and* write your union leadership and Mr. Sweeney. Demand that you see some action for your union dues! No matter what your personal feelings towards your union, wear your union pin every day as a signal of solidarity with your co-workers. It makes management very nervous to see solidarity.
We, as Americans must put a stop to outsourcing, to off-shoring and to the loss of American jobs that will bring our national economy down to third-world levels.
One more thing about "herding cats." Wasn't there a union symbol of solidarity back in the IWW days of a black cat?
In Solidarity,
Dea
I agree, got to go, Company is here![post="204302"][/post]