May 2004
Dear fellow LAX flight attendant:
By now, you have heard about the company's plans to shorten our NYC
transcon sequences to minimal, airport stays, with all layovers in the 10:00 to
13: 00 hour range, effective with the June bid sheet. Despite the flight
attendant group's collective sacrifices, and despite our continued
commitment to maintaining our dignity and professionalism in the face of recent adversity, the company has chosen to reverse our long fought for, and hard won,
principles of transcon scheduling, which, include, but are not limited to, an
appropriate mix of downtown and airport layovers, to meet the needs of a
wide range of flight attendants; avoidance of morning East Coast
departures for LAX crews; and a recognition of this base's historically equitable
participation in, and contribution to, the transcon, wide-body market.
In the series of meetings I have had with the company, and in the flurry of
emails which have gone back and forth, I have made it clear that we will NOT simply accept this latest company initiative without a fight.The company's argument is that, in order to send one trip downtown for an entire month, the company would incur an additional cost of approximately $6500, as opposed to flying the trip with an airport layover. I have argued, to no avail, that this is simply part of the cost of doing business. We are not numbers; we are people. When, in the recent past, we have approached the company for a return of our 8-behind the door rule, the company immediately assigned a dollar amount to this concession and asked us what we would give up to buy it back. (We have nothing left to give up.) Now, when the company wants to take away something further from us, such as transcon layovers in NYC, they offer US nothing in return. Where is the equity?The bulk of our return flying from the East Coast now involves morning departures from JFK, with no apparent concern for body clock issues.
Long observed principles of transcon scheduling have been ignored in the pursuit of lower costs
at our expense. In arguing the issue, we have been very evenhanded. Realizing that a mix of transcon trips better serves the needs of a wide range of flight attendants, we have NOT demanded that ALL layovers be downtown. We simply want whatis reasonable. We have argued that there are no viable food options in, or around, the JFK layover hotel. Late arriving crews are unable to procure much more than a stale bag of potato chips from a vending machine in the lobby. There is no deli on the corner; no bagel shop up the block. The basic tenets of adequate rest and sustenance are being ignored in order to build the most economical schedule possible. I wonder, however, as will all LAX flight attendants, how many LAX cockpitcrews will be riding ALONE to Manhattan for their lengthy downtown layovers, while LAX flight attendant crews languish in an airport hotel, hungry, with no possibility of ever again seeing downtown NYC.
I have made it clear to management that I will be "mobilizing the troops." I
need your help. The hard-working flight attendants of this base need to send
a message, loud and clear, to management that they consider this latest
decline in our work life to be unacceptable. Please email Lauri Curtis at
lauri.curtis@aa.com; Frank Campagna (Regional Manager) at
frank.campagna@aa.com; and Sean Lynch (Base Manager) at
sean.lynch@aa.com. Let them know how you feel.
In unity,
John Nikides
APFA LAX Base Chair