- Jun 12, 2010
- 238
- 41
Perhaps there are many who are undecided about the vote.
Now you can read all the reasons for voting NO here.
The Co. is pushing the YES vote because it is better for them.
and what is good for them is bad for us.
So the No vote is better for us than the Yes vote!
For those voting YES, think about the Article 1 scope concerning outsourcing of our work. The LBO says that total outsourcing is limited to 35%. Then they go on to state that the outsourcing can exceed 35% if certain conditions are met; like low headcount or lack of hangar space, or lack of skill. Simple manipulation of the RIF and changing maint. scheduling will work to the co. benefit here. Read the language please.
Remember what the Schedulers-BeanCounters did to the 757 heavies, which proved the case for outsourcing under the current contract.
So with a little tweaking, we are up to that dreaded 40% outsourcing anyway. Think about it a little more.
Now you can read all the reasons for voting NO here.
The Co. is pushing the YES vote because it is better for them.
and what is good for them is bad for us.
So the No vote is better for us than the Yes vote!
For those voting YES, think about the Article 1 scope concerning outsourcing of our work. The LBO says that total outsourcing is limited to 35%. Then they go on to state that the outsourcing can exceed 35% if certain conditions are met; like low headcount or lack of hangar space, or lack of skill. Simple manipulation of the RIF and changing maint. scheduling will work to the co. benefit here. Read the language please.
Remember what the Schedulers-BeanCounters did to the 757 heavies, which proved the case for outsourcing under the current contract.
So with a little tweaking, we are up to that dreaded 40% outsourcing anyway. Think about it a little more.