Hmmmm . . . . let's see . . . TWA owned virtually NO aircraft . . and
717s gone outright
767-200s gone outright
767-300s gone this November. Don't hold your breath on seeing any "replacements"
757s to be returned to leasors in the next couple years (and I wouldn't be surprised to see them returned sooner after the new business plan swings into play)
Significant # of LLC MD-80s probably to replace AAL F-100s. These MD-80s could have easily been picked up from TWA's creditors/leasors after TWA would have had to closed its doors 2/00.
After discounting the MD-80s doing F-100 duty, it looks to me like all that TWA capacity "value" wasn't needed after all.
IF the economy and business travel had held up, AND the capacity was needed in the SHORT term . . . . . THEN the TWA asset acquisition might have made sense. It didn't, it wasn't, and doesn't.
I get a kick out of this concept of "ownership" put forth by some TWA pilots. . . in reality, employees don't "own" ANYTHING except what's written into their contract. When your company goes bankrupt or is liquidated on the courthouse steps and your contract is voided or emasculated, then you don't "own" hardly anything, if anything at all. If American goes bankrupt and is bought on the courthouse steps, if I get a job with new owners of American's assets at ANY seniority number, I'll consider myself LUCKY . . . . but then, I never worked (or wanted to work) for the wonderful and wildly successful TWA.