US Airways Offered $263.9 Million To Stay

genejockey

Advanced
Aug 22, 2002
157
0
www.usaviation.com
US Airways Offered $263.9 Million To Stay
Thu Jun 12, 2:22 AM ET Add Local - WTAE ThePittsburghChannel.com to My Yahoo!

Pennsylvania''s top officials on Wednesday offered $263.9 million in airport investments over five years to persuade US Airways to keep its hub in Pittsburgh, a plan quickly deemed a good-faith effort by the airline''s chief.

But US Airways chief executive officer David Siegel said the offer was only the opening step in negotiations beginning Thursday, and bluntly said he could not promise to accept it.

Absolutely not, Siegel said when asked if he could immediately commit to remaining at Pittsburgh International Airport. What we''re committing to is a process to work very hard, and I would define success as finding a resolution where we can stay in Pittsburgh, where it works for U.S. Airways and works for Pennsylvania.

The goal is to stay, he added.

The offer was made during a 90-minute meeting in Washington between Siegel and top Pennsylvania officials, including Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell, Republican Sens. Arlen Specter and Rick Santorum, and 14 of the state''s 19 House members.

Action News has learned that the group also told Siegel that the state of Pennsylvania wants a seat on the board of directors of the airline -- in exchange for the millions of dollars the state will invest in the company.

US Airways, which emerged from bankruptcy in late March, has said it needs roughly $864 million worth of investments over the next five years to maintain current service levels in Pennsylvania.

WTAE''s Sheldon Ingram is in Washington. Watch his report on Action News and refresh this page Thursday morning for updates.

Rendell, who drew up the proposal, said that amount far exceeds what the public can invest. His plan - a mix of federal, state and local funding - would upgrade hub terminals, hangars and other facilities, and lower operating costs at both the Pittsburgh and Philadelphia airports. The airline''s third hub is located in Charlotte, N.C.

But the deal came with strings attached: If the airline ultimately shuts down its Pittsburgh hub, as it has threatened to do as part of its companywide restructuring plan, it will not receive any of the aid for Philadelphia facilities.

We are going to act as a team, Rendell said. If US Airways does not continue to hub at both airports, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, then none of these benefits will be available to US Air.

Moreover, Rendell said, the investments at both airports will help all air carriers, not just US Airways exclusively. But he said the state is willing to sweeten the deal with more money if there''s more significant commitment by US Air.

The state is offering to invest up to $30 million to build a new mainline training facility for US Airways in Pittsburgh. But the company must commit to maintain it''s hub status in Pittsburgh.

Specter, who said he wore out the telephone lines since the terror attacks to help US Airways keep its head above the water, predicted the airline would maintain a viable Pittsburgh operation and described himself as optimistic after the meeting in his Washington office.

Other lawmakers also said they were happy with Siegel''s initial response to the offer, which was made after more than two months of tense rhetoric from both sides.

Negotiations begin Thursday and will be wrapped up by July 18.
 

This is such a joke. The only way this airline is kept in business is to use taxpayer monies.......extortion is still a crime....​
 
----------------
On 6/12/2003 11:32:33 AM delldude wrote:




----------------
On 6/12/2003 10:42:22 AM gilbertguy wrote:



This is such a joke. The only way this airline is kept in business is to use taxpayer monies....
7.gif"
...extortion is still a crime....
15.gif"

----------------​
not in washington

Delldude, I stand corrected....the gov''t ALWAYS knows what''s best with OUR $$$!!
 
----------------
On 6/12/2003 10:42:22 AM gilbertguy wrote:



This is such a joke. The only way this airline is kept in business is to use taxpayer monies.......extortion is still a crime....​

----------------​
not in washington
 
Yeah, lets hope the state of PA give USAirways the middle finger; then the company can pull finally pull the plug on PIT and the state of PA can spend 263.9 million on unemployment checks! Great idea!!!
 
----------------
On 6/12/2003 11:52:25 AM DorkDriver wrote:

Yeah, lets hope the state of PA give USAirways the middle finger; then the company can pull finally pull the plug on PIT and the state of PA can spend 263.9 million on unemployment checks! Great idea!!!

----------------​


Hey Dork,

As PIT goes, so does PHL for U and any future possible "hand out" from the government....and guess what? For U, PHL is the International "gate way" and the "mecca" to their franchise. If there is no PHL for U, there ain't much of a "franchise" left. And its curtains FOR ALL.

It ain't all about PIT, brother.

You better pray they all can find an equitable solution for both interests.
 
----------------
On 6/12/2003 11:52:25 AM DorkDriver wrote:

Yeah, lets hope the state of PA give USAirways the middle finger; then the company can pull finally pull the plug on PIT and the state of PA can spend 263.9 million on unemployment checks! Great idea!!!

At least that money will go back into the local economy....
 
Im sure a carrier such as Northwest would be licking their chops to get its hands on the PHL operation, given the right amount of incentive to pull into town full throttle.
 
----------------
On 6/13/2003 7:10:04 PM TheWatcher wrote:

Im sure a carrier such as Northwest would be licking their chops to get its hands on the PHL operation,
----------------​

Why in the world would they do that after opening their own new terminal in DTW??! AA is heavily invested in JFK. CO in EWR. UA at IAD. DL also at JFK, along with ATL. There would be a void to fill with U gone at PHL, but who knows how many of those transatlantic routes would be picked up if all the majors have heavy intl operations in nearby cities. PHL could become the model hubless airport.

That shiney new terminal A-West in PHL could go highly under utilized over the next few years if US were to fold.
 
IMHO, PHL would become like SEA. SEA has several airlines with a decent presence (UA, Alaska) but it''s not a "hub" in the traditional hub-and-spoke model (e.g., ORD, PIT, MSP, etc.).
 
I dont know...there were many rumors going around when US was in danger of going under that NWA would pick up slack in PHL. Now granted it would not be as big as what US is in PHL but it would still be considered a hub. Think...NWA has no hub east of DTW where most of the transatlatic flights depart along with MSP. So anyone in south carolina, north carolina, virginia, maryland, new york, Penn, georgia who wants to take NWA to Europe all have to fly west to connect to a flight that flies east. PHL would be a good transatlantic hub for NWA. I know NWA doesnt have many european destinations as their focus is AMS, but PHL would be a good building block for them

Also i dont really think UA is that committed to IAD if they are considering decreasing the number of flights out of IAD. Also although AA has had a strong presence in JFK for a while with many european destinations, AA clearly does not see the potential they thought JFK had several years ago...might be a reason why they conintually push the opening date back for the new terminal in JFK, in fact they said they would rather just stop construction now.
 
----------------
On 6/12/2003 11:52:25 AM DorkDriver wrote:

Yeah, lets hope the state of PA give USAirways the middle finger; then the company can pull finally pull the plug on PIT and the state of PA can spend 263.9 million on unemployment checks! Great idea!!!

----------------​
PA needs to cut a LOT of UC checks at $400 a week (after taxes) which is the maxout number to reach $263.9 million...Hmmm, wonder where my good supply side friend Rick Santorum is on this one?
 
PIT bull and the rest don't get it!

U is in PIT only because they haven't had time to pull out. This is not a government bailout, it is an attempt by PIT and PA to keep U put, an incentive. U doesn't need PIT, PIT needs U. Any deals by the government is an enticement to stay, done by all states to attract businesses to locate there. Just because U is already there doesn't mean they shouldn't get a deal. Since you all seem to hate working here so much I suggest you get a life and another job, or else get on board and grab an oar and quit bitchin'.
 
----------------
On 6/16/2003 2:32:27 PM a320av8r wrote:

PIT bull and the rest don''t get it!

U is in PIT only because they haven''t had time to pull out. This is not a government bailout, it is an attempt by PIT and PA to keep U put, an incentive. U doesn''t need PIT, PIT needs U. Any deals by the government is an enticement to stay, done by all states to attract businesses to locate there. Just because U is already there doesn''t mean they shouldn''t get a deal. Since you all seem to hate working here so much I suggest you get a life and another job, or else get on board and grab an oar and quit bitchin''.

----------------​

a320av8tr,

NO, you don''t get it "bright eyes"...U needs PHL which is IN PA...now you get that straight and then we''ll talk.