Maybe they should take the actual SEC filing for Q3 (or all of 2010) instead of a speculation article.I sure hope the JNC takes THAT article back to the table during their next "concessions" exchange.
I sure hope the JNC takes THAT article back to the table during their next "concessions" exchange.
We don't take cash onboard anymore. There is your profit.
There is always an employment downside to any combination of companies. Redundant workers get the boot.Well, if US has a lot of cash on hand and AA is in BK, then it will be US buying AA, not a merger of any sorts (regardless of what the combined name is). Do you think that US would then staple its on employees to the bottom of a merged list? I don't see the employment downside.
The stronger US is, the less likely they are to be acquired as their stock price should move upward.
We just need to concentrate on our issues without speculating incessantly about another mergerWell, if US has a lot of cash on hand and AA is in BK, then it will be US buying AA, not a merger of any sorts (regardless of what the combined name is). Do you think that US would then staple its on employees to the bottom of a merged list? I don't see the employment downside.
The stronger US is, the less likely they are to be acquired as their stock price should move upward.
I don't think that any union on the property would pursue stapling anyone on the bottom of their combined list. Well maybe I am optimistic.
"...- in 13 days this merger will be 5 years old and there are still two large groups of employees not integrated. There's plenty of work to be done on that front without worrying about what may or may not happen years down the road."
Jim