Verdict today for Pfc Manning on trial for being a traitor

snapthis

Veteran
Dec 23, 2009
4,236
6,907
Verdict likely Tuesday in Bradley Manning court-martial, judge says
Published July 29, 2013
Associated Press

July 25, 2013: Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted out of a courthouse at Fort Mead, Md. (AP)
FORT MEADE, Md. – A military judge says she expects to announce a verdict Tuesday in the court-martial of an Army private charged with aiding the enemy for giving U.S. secrets to WikiLeaks.
Col. Denise Lind gave the heads-up notice Monday, her third day of deliberations in the trial of Pfc. Bradley Manning at Fort Meade. Manning faces a possible life sentence if convicted of the charge.
The 25-year-old also faces 20 other counts, including espionage, computer fraud and theft for admittedly sending hundreds of thousands of classified documents and some battlefield video to the anti-secrecy website while working as an intelligence analyst in Iraq.
In closing arguments last week, the defense portrayed Manning as a naive whistleblower who wanted to expose war crimes. Prosecutors call him an anarchist hacker and a traitor.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/29/verdict-likely-tuesday-in-bradley-manning-court-martial-judge-says/?test=latestnews#ixzz2aXQMsiP7
 
And hero to other nutty types showing their "pride"

San Francisco Pride Honors Bradley Manning, Now Backtracking Any Way Possible
Urvi Nagrani | 3 months ago | 2 Comments

In a press release on the afternoon of May 7 prior to their monthly board meeting, the San Francisco Pride Board of Directors released a statement intended to clarify the reasons that Bradley Manning was named a community grand marshal before having that honor revoked.

In their release they argue that "the community grand marshal upon whom the Electoral College votes is defined as 'a local hero (individual) not being a celebrity' … Because Mr. Manning is not local, by definition under the Grand Marshal policy, he may not be nominated or elected by the Electoral College as its community grand marshal."

This release comes on the heels of a protest on April 29 in which many community leaders protested SF Pride for their decision to revoke the honor they'd voted to bestow upon Bradley Manning.

Speakers at the April 29 protest included a wide range of military perspectives from Daniel Ellsberg, famous for releasing the Pentagon Papers, to John Caldera, an honorably discharged U.S. Navy corpsman and openly gay member of the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Commission. Also present was Rainey Reitman, who founded the Bradley Manning Support Network and spoke of the work of supporters, while Stephen Funk, a gay man who was court-martialed for his opposition to the Iraq war, called Manning a "freedom fighter."

Almost all the speakers at the protest referenced SF Pride Board President Lisa William’s press release on April 27 which said, "Bradley Manning is facing the military justice system of this country. We all await the decision of that system. However, until that time, even the hint of support for actions which placed in harms way the lives of our men and women in uniform — and countless others, military and civilian alike — will not be tolerated by the leadership of San Francisco Pride. It is, and would be, an insult to every one, gay and straight, who has ever served in the military of this country."

Caldera responded at the rally that "SF Pride sponsors include Bank of America and Wells Fargo, who have foreclosed on hundreds of veteran families" and went on to call for Lisa William's resignation over the issue.

One former grand marshal, Gary Virginia, demanded an explanation of the process through which grand marshals are selected, and said until the board did so it not only would fail to represent the community, but also taint the honor of former grand marshals if the process was found to be unrepresentative. He assured the crowd that as a co-founder of the Pride Brunch fundraiser, their event would honor Manning.

While SF Pride's newest press release doesn't address all of the protesters concerns, nor does it address a recent complaint filed against it at the San Francisco Human Rights Commission concerning Mr. Manning — it does backpedal on the former political reasons for removing Mr. Manning's nomination by changing the reason for revoking the honor to a technical byline. Whether or not this new tactic from SF Pride will remove the controversy surrounding the issue remains to be seen.

NOTE: This story has continued to develop as SF Pride's Board had their monthly meeting Monday night. SF Pride called in police to remove protesters and promised to hold public comment in the future at a larger venue, however, no date has been announced.
 
Odd bedfellows.

True, GQ.

"Caldera responded at the rally that "SF Pride sponsors include Bank of America and Wells Fargo, who have foreclosed on hundreds of veteran families" and went on to call for Lisa William's resignation over the issue."
 
Also sets the stage for whatever might happen with Snowden... it will be much harder to spin him as a traitor when Manning was determined to be not guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Is everything always so binary to you?

There are certainly judges with agendas, but they tend not to survive very long in the military.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Is everything always so binary to you?

There are certainly judges with agendas, but they tend not to survive very long in the military.

WELL, there you have it folks,.............Eolesen is suggesting that US Army Col.,/ Judge..... Denise Lind ' May ' be unfit to try cases (Manning), because the Woman ' Might have ' a Bias ! !

(Activate Tin Foil head coverings ASAP )