Watch For The Next Twu Failure Soon.

Decision 2004

Veteran
Mar 12, 2004
1,618
0
AMR considers new initiatives to stay profitable

09:31 AM CDT on Thursday, September 23, 2004


By SUZANNE MARTA / The Dallas Morning News



NEW YORK__Battling high fuel prices and industry overcapacity, American Airlines parent AMR Corp. is looking to further trim costs and eke out more productivity as a way to keep the world’s largest airline competitive.

“There are simply too few passengers willing to pay the prices we need to be profitable,†said chairman and chief executive Gerard Arpey in a breakfast meeting with the Society of Airline Analysts Thursday.

Mr. Arpey outlined a wide range of initiatives that the Fort Worth-based carrier is considering, including making maintenance operations more efficient, keeping pilots with aircraft to reduce potential scheduling delays and eliminating “More Room Throughout Coach†on additional routes.

Despite slashing $4 billion in annual costs, the Fort Worth-based carrier’s finances remain tenuous. At least one analyst said bankruptcy may still be a possibility as American fights to remain competitive with its peers, particularly if other carriers use reorganization as a way to eliminate expensive labor contracts and pension programs.

“(American) would be at a disadvantage not to,†said Helane Becker, an analyst with The Benchmark Company LLC.

American revealed after the market closed Wednesday that high fuel prices, intense competition and hurricanes would cause it to miss some of its loan requirements and it would need to refinance a $834 million credit line.

The company also said it now expects to pay an average of $1.20 per gallon of jet fuel for 2004 – up from an earlier estimate of $1.17.

Mr. Arpey said on Thursday that the 3 cent increase would cost the company an additional $111 million. Overall, American’s fuel bill is expected to be more than $1 billion higher than last year.

"Our cost structure just isn't low enough for that reality,†Mr. Arpey said.
 
Just remember Dave believes we are over manned and is willing to allow work to be outsourced. He also believes our scope clause is worthless.

No hope with no scope, is this your phrase Dave? I believe the better terminology would be " No Hope with Amfa and the helm"
 
Dave has put his opinion in print, you and I both know he has a woody for the TWAers at MCI, thus his reason for attempting to spread panic amongst the members there, even the ones that have signed cards in disgust. Go fish!
 
Inability to face the truth when you look it in the eye, is weak leadership, and sheep mentality.
 
Decision 2004 said:
Inability to face the truth when you look it in the eye, is weak leadership, and sheep mentality.
[post="184122"][/post]​


How does supporting those you solicit rate within your idealistic reasoning?

You're a real hero, decision 2004 :blink:

------------------------------------
amfa: The YUGO of the labor movement
Where bargaining means YOU GO....!
 
High Speed Steel said:
How does supporting those you solicit rate within your idealistic reasoning?

You're a real hero, decision 2004 :blink:
------------------------------------
amfa: The YUGO of the labor movement
Where bargaining means YOU GO....!
[post="184152"][/post]​


How does it feel to need more than one alias to feign support?

Thanks for the "HERO" compliment, I needed a pat on the back today.
 
Checking it Out said:
Just remember Dave believes we are over manned and is willing to allow work to be outsourced. He also believes our scope clause is worthless.

No hope with no scope, is this your phrase Dave? I believe the better terminology would be " No Hope with Amfa and the helm"
[post="183870"][/post]​

cio ask anyone at the base if we are over manned and submit your findings. Sometimes its hard to balance reality with politics and I see by your comment your more politician than real. Our scope is worthless but its obvious by postings you fall into the old school way of useing the memberships lack of knowledge and or lack of interest to deceive them with your rantings not only on this forum but also in the twu informer, (by the b.s. thats in those newsletters one has to assume you or someone with your mentality is behind them).
 
Decision 2004 said:
Ouch,

"another" TWU supporter strikes an unyeilding blow! :lol:
[post="184648"][/post]​


Wow there sure are a lot of Dave Stewarts around there. Dave S the Tulsa world reporter, Dave S in AA management, Dave S the AMFA organizer and now some other Dave S that is called Calvin!
 
Calvin said:
to spread panic amongst the members there,
[post="183974"][/post]​

I would say that the TWU has done a pretty good job of that already. They used panic in order to get those guys to vote to agree to roll back system protection and lower wages and benifits to the lowest in the industry.


In 2008 the top paid AA mechanics weekly wage will be around $400 less than the top paid LCC SWA mechanic!
 

Latest posts