Wisconsin job creation rank falls to 38th in U.S

Crash Pad DCA

Senior
Mar 6, 2011
322
176
DCA
www.flickr.com
http://www.jsonline.com/business/wisconsin-job-creation-rank-falls-to-38th-in-us-b99464770z1-296876421.html
 
Wisconsin's pace of job creation, which has lagged the national rate for years, fell further behind in the latest quarterly data while landing the Badger State in the bottom tier of its peer Midwestern states.
 
Thursday's release of the most accurate employment data available raises questions about the strength of Wisconsin's economic recovery, said Charles Franklin, a social scientist and data specialist at Marquette University Law School.
 
"Our job creation has slipped a little bit more relative to other states, and that's a source of some concern at a time when the national economy is growing at stronger rates," said Franklin, who routinely analyzes Wisconsin's employment data in order to interpret statewide public opinion polls that he carries out for Marquette's law school.
 
Wisconsin gained 27,491 private-sector jobs in the 12 months from September 2013 through September 2014, a 1.16% increase that gives Wisconsin a rank of 40th among the 50 states in the pace of job creation in that period. But the differences between Wisconsin, Vermont and Iowa were so fractional that the three states effectively tied at a rank of 38th.
 
Either way, the state's national ranking fell from a revised rank of 31st three months earlier, in the previous release of quarterly jobs data, which covered the 12 months through June 2014. In that period, Wisconsin created 36,732 private-sector jobs.
 
Wisconsin continued to trail the national rate of job creation, as it has continuously since July 2011. The United States created private-sector jobs at a rate of 2.3% in the latest 12-month period, twice Wisconsin's 1.16% rate, the data show.
 
"Given the historical relationship of employment in Wisconsin versus the nation, I would have expected Wisconsin growth to be faster," said Menzie Chinn, an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
 
Among its peer states in the Midwest, Wisconsin tied with Iowa for last place. Both states created private-sector jobs at a 1.16% rate.
 
The bloc of Midwestern states, which share similar economies of factory cities and farm towns, often benchmark against each other. In the latest period, Michigan and Indiana led that group of states with 2.02% and 1.64% growth, respectively. Minnesota was just ahead of Wisconsin at 1.2%.
 
A breakdown of Thursday's numbers show Wisconsin trailed the nation's job-creation average among retailers, a sector that includes cashiers and clerks, as well as construction and a combined sector called health care and social services. In the leisure and hospitality sector, which includes wait staff, hotel clerks and baristas, Wisconsin lost jobs while the nation added them at a 2.6% pace.
 
Wisconsin effectively tied the nation in the pace of new manufacturing jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
walker-sign-200px.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Just a question . Wondering what Wis. Unemployment rate is? vs total employment rate .vs percent of population that is employed. Job creation rates are not an indicator of anything if you have employment levels below 6%. If you do then people can not change jobs because there are no job openings. You basically or ideally need 5 to 6 % unemployment other wise you are enslaved to your current job.But that probably doesn't help with your anti Walker rant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Glenn Quagmire said:
Why don't you tell us WT (meto/spectator)
I'll take that as an unable to answer the question. So you must be (700/dawg)... What a stupid response. I'm not WT . Ignored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Q is famous for his foot in the mouth attempts at trying to slam other people... it shows.

you mean you don't.

obviously a whole lot of people in WI do like what he has done or he wouldn't have survived this long.

and as much as job creation stats turn a lot of people on, state governmnets have a far greater ability to cut spending and it has a bigger impact on taxpayers.

how about you tell us how WI has fared in cutting government spending?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
He is cutting 13% form UW's (who needs education right?) budget. He is skipping a $108 million payment on the debt which will cot the tax payers of WI an extra $1.1 million in interest. There is also a $280 million budget short fall. He signed a $500 million tax cut when the state had a $1 billion surplus. Surplus is gone but the tax breaks are still there. Walker has bragged that he has cut over $2 billion in taxes since 2011. He ran the budget from a $1 billion surplus to a budget deficit and state that is in debt. Part of this may be because from 2013-14 spending increased by $2.1 billion which exceeded inflation by over 3%.

So, it seems Walked has done a great job budget wise in WI ....... that is by republican standards at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
The pro-RTW camp will point to the job creation rates in IN and MI as evidence that WI could very well see higher job growth percentages in 2015 and beyond.

The anti-RTW camp will question whether IN and MI are better off as a result or whether the new jobs are at substandard wages. At low wages, you can create lots and lots of jobs that might not be valued as highly as fewer jobs created at higher wages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Yep. Meanwhile job growth (low wage or not) in WI is still lagging...

BTW, for those that may not know, Walker was voted in largely on a campaign promise to create 250k jobs. Where are they?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Just a question . Wondering what Wis. Unemployment rate is? vs total employment rate .vs percent of population that is employed. Job creation rates are not an indicator of anything if you have employment levels below 6%. If you do then people can not change jobs because there are no job openings. You basically or ideally need 5 to 6 % unemployment other wise you are enslaved to your current job.But that probably doesn't help with your anti Walker rant.
You forgot-How many of the jobs created are PT as opposed to FT, who has the better overall benefits, etc.

Figures can be altered to suit you but leave out so many hidden benefits that outrank jobs created in other states. Creating Jobs is a one sided issue that doesn't tell the unemployment numbers and the benefit numbers.

So how many people are leaving Wisconsin to seek jobs in other job-creating states?

Get the real figures, folks, then you can argue about your perceived reality and the real reality.
 
He is cutting 13% form UW's (who needs education right?) budget. He is skipping a $108 million payment on the debt which will cot the tax payers of WI an extra $1.1 million in interest. There is also a $280 million budget short fall. He signed a $500 million tax cut when the state had a $1 billion surplus. Surplus is gone but the tax breaks are still there. Walker has bragged that he has cut over $2 billion in taxes since 2011. He ran the budget from a $1 billion surplus to a budget deficit and state that is in debt. Part of this may be because from 2013-14 spending increased by $2.1 billion which exceeded inflation by over 3%. So, it seems Walked has done a great job budget wise in WI ....... that is by republican standards at least.
When people talk about NYS I know immediately whether they are from NY and more importantly whether they are Upstate or Downstate. I also know if NYers actually perceive the reality of the state if they can tell the difference.

You keep drawing party lines, and are therefore a one-sided opinionated troll with blinders on. Unless you LIVE in Wisconsin, maybe you shouldn't keep proving that you are a fool.

You see here in NY, I know that even Democrats hate Cuomo for his current agendas.
 
Yep. Meanwhile job growth (low wage or not) in WI is still lagging...

BTW, for those that may not know, Walker was voted in largely on a campaign promise to create 250k jobs. Where are they?
I have to wonder, and perhaps speculate, that maybe the existing jobs were profitable enough to hire more employees. Technically, jobs weren't created but were filling another void.

As warped as that sounds the language can be used both as a pro and con in a situation that talks about jobs. You need to look at the unemployment rate to see if anybody really gives a crap about how many jobs are created. And the numbers show below national average...

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=wisconsin+unemployment+rate+statistics
 
At low wages, you can create lots and lots of jobs that might not be valued as highly as fewer jobs created at higher wages.
Well cheer up, because low wage jobs will be a thing of the past as minimum wage approaches your wages, and your wages don't go up too much.
 
Ms Tree said:
He is cutting 13% form UW's (who needs education right?) budget.
What's wrong with letting those who get their degree foot the bill?

Or, how about getting rid of all the bloat and overhead?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/septemberoctober_2011/features/administrators_ate_my_tuition031641.php?page=all

Between 1975 and 2005, total spending by American higher educational institutions, stated in constant dollars, tripled, to more than $325 billion per year. Over the same period, the faculty-to-student ratio has remained fairly constant, at approximately fifteen or sixteen students per instructor. One thing that has changed, dramatically, is the administrator-per-student ratio. In 1975, colleges employed one administrator for every eighty-four students and one professional staffer—admissions officers, information technology specialists, and the like—for every fifty students. By 2005, the administrator-to-student ratio had dropped to one administrator for every sixty-eight students while the ratio of professional staffers had dropped to one for every twenty-one students.
I've seen the same thing happening in some public school districts. Classroom sizes are ridiculous, yet there's no shortage of job openings for non-certified staff positions.
 

Latest posts