The WN and AT was a flat purchase. No merger, no take over due to dire finacials, etc... it was a buy-out to eliminate a competitor, to pick up international flying rather quickly, to grow 25% very quickly, and to attain the A/C and routes that existed within AT at a much more quicker pace. The US/AA combination (IMO) is more of a forced move that US forced AA into, not really a take over. AA never wanted to combine with US, just like no-one else did either, but basically, Parkers rather behind closed door deals with the unions and well as the creditors is what forced AA to submit to the combination. I would rather call it a "combination" but the general media (any time 2 airlines combine) always reports it as mergers, no matter how they really ended up combining. Even though SWA and AT was a flat out purchase, they still all called it a merger, when it wasn't a merger. The closest thing to a merger (IMO) was the UAL/CAL combination, even though it was only done to get away from the US/UAL combination. For some reason no-one wanted to combine with US thru-out the airline industry. I honestly think they all wanted (or maybe made a pact) to see US fall by the waste side and go out of bus and then suck up all the assests, routes, and aircraft on the cheap while eliminating another competitor. Now, AA is forced to do a combination with US and we will all see how it ends up in the long run, maybe there was a reason all along why no-one wanted to hook up with the ugly girl (US) and only time will tell. I would like to wish all of you involved in the combination of AA and US good luck and hope there will a minimum of relocations, hard aches, and any rifs.what makes you think it is a take over? all the reports indicate it is a merger not a take over.. if you think its a take over then how would you describe dl-nw co-ua and fl-wn