Cosmo, it is not a question of "whinning" as you so eloquently put it.
As far as what is going on, UAL would have done the same thing as Airtran, if it helped them. Obviously, Frnt used to loan to defend againts an attack from UAL, certainly UAL might return the favour, so to speak.
You are absolutely correct, the ATSB applications is valid and was done under accordance of law. If UAL meets the requirement and the ATSB believe it is appropiate, they should be granted the guarantee. It would be unfair, to change the enacted law at this juncture, on the other hand, should UAL's loan guarantee be denied this time, should UAL be allowed to reapply indefinitely?
Having a discussion, pro and con, is interesting and might even be in the spirit of this board
As far as what is going on, UAL would have done the same thing as Airtran, if it helped them. Obviously, Frnt used to loan to defend againts an attack from UAL, certainly UAL might return the favour, so to speak.
You are absolutely correct, the ATSB applications is valid and was done under accordance of law. If UAL meets the requirement and the ATSB believe it is appropiate, they should be granted the guarantee. It would be unfair, to change the enacted law at this juncture, on the other hand, should UAL's loan guarantee be denied this time, should UAL be allowed to reapply indefinitely?
Having a discussion, pro and con, is interesting and might even be in the spirit of this board