American and the FAA

Discussion in 'American Airlines' started by 1AA, Sep 2, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 1AA

    1AA Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,592
    Likes Received:
    4,136
    Lately the FAA has been under pressure for lack of oversight and being too cozy with management. OK so the FAA got real picky about our MD 80 wiring bundle fiasco. As I remember the inspector(s) were anal about the spacing and the direction of the knots.
    Even as all practices and parts were airworthy we still grounded our fleet under pressure from the FAA. Now why is it that the FAA allows SouthWest to continue to fly their aircraft with know unairworthy parts until December? Is there one set of rules for AA and another for SWA? Seems to me that bogus parts should be a valid reason to ground the affective aircraft until replaced versus wire bundle lacing practices.

    Any comments on this logic????
     
  2. The Goose

    The Goose Guest

    "My politician is stronger than yours", perhaps?
     
  3. JAFA

    JAFA Advanced

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    22
    My plain brown envelope is thicker than your plain brown envelope. Size does matter. :up:
     
  4. skipfly

    skipfly Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    1
    Not that the FAA deserves anyone backing their actions against AA, but maybe you forgot about 250+ MD-80 tailcone slides that AA was given 30 days to fix. That could have been huge, so they worked with AA one that one.
     
  5. 700UW

    700UW Corn Field

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    37,637
    Likes Received:
    19,488
    Probably had to do with not wanting to ground planes of the airline that carriers the most domestic passengers so they would loss money and the real airlines make a profit for a change.

    Plus isnt Georgie boy from TX? hint hint
     
  6. FA Mikey

    FA Mikey Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,421
    Likes Received:
    301
    full article here

    An escalating dispute between the Federal Aviation Administration and American Airlines came to a boil Friday with The Wall Street Journal reporting government inspectors think the airline tried to hide defects and safety problems on their aircraft. According to people familiar with the details, American "abruptly retired" one jet to hide it from inspectors during a maintenance check-up of at least 16 aircraft with allegedly improper repairs, the newspaper reported.
     
  7. 7-cubed

    7-cubed Newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    When will the Board of Directors recognize what Bob Redding and his "cut it to the bone" maintenance program is doing to this airline, and put him on the street?
     
  8. The Goose

    The Goose Guest

    Has anyone considered if the FAA grounded enough aircraft (80s), the company could call a layoff and pay no severance per contract?

    "Allowing" the FAA to do the dirty work while getting a free ride would be about what I'd expect from the trash that runs AMR.
     
  9. eolesen

    eolesen Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Messages:
    14,603
    Likes Received:
    9,174
    It's called emergency leave... Not quite force majeure, but a notch below it.

    Your disdain for management is noted, but I don't think I'd call them trash.

    The current leaders have their shortcomings, and were idiots for their handling of the PUPs, but even those actions don't come anywhere near the level of self-serving arrogence shown by the real robber barons in the industry: Stephen Wolfe (UA, US), Rakesh Gangwohl (US), Glenn Tilton (UA), Carl Icahn (TW), Jonathan Ornstein (YV), or Frank Lorenzo (CO, EA)...
     
  10. Hopeful

    Hopeful Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    5,998
    Likes Received:
    347
    FAA is basically accusing AA of forgoing a maintenance issue because the aircraft was going to be grounded anyway.

    But Southwest gets to keep flying aircraft with suspect parts installed simply because they don't pose a safety threat.


    Yea, I'd say the FAA is gunning for AA.
     
  11. TWU informer

    TWU informer Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    7,545
    Likes Received:
    3,758

    That is the same mentality of TWU supporters during the AMFA drive.

     
  12. And from the Fort Worth Star Telegram

    Read the full storry here: http://www.star-telegram.com/857/story/1588993.html

    A mechanics union official questioned all the fuss.

    If something was later found to have been wrong with the jetliner, "the mechanics and the company are still culpable for whatever happened when the plane was in service," said Donald Videtich, an aircraft mechanic who oversees maintenance and engineering issues at the Transport Workers Union of America.

    "How somebody can make the assumption that American is trying to hide something is problematic," said Videtich, of Hurst.

    "Why would American try to hide something if they self-disclosed a problem with fasteners? And then they run and hide a plane in the desert?

    "This is crazy. This isn’t a story; it just doesn’t ring true."

    Moreover, he called it irresponsible to raise concerns among the flying public before a busy holiday weekend.

    He also said the report wrongly described relations between the FAA and American as strained, adding that he has only seen cooperation, not discord, in recent months.

    "Our planes are inspected, and we don’t have a problem with the FAA," Videtich said. "We have a check-and-balance system that has been in place and which we work with."

    Videtich said there is more continuous FAA scrutiny at American facilities than at offshore maintenance centers used by other U.S. carriers in such countries as El Salvador, Costa Rica, Mexico and China where, in some cases, a week’s advance notice of an inspection must be given.
     
  13. TWU informer

    TWU informer Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    7,545
    Likes Received:
    3,758
    Good job TWU.

    No mention of failed negotiations. Just defending of the company.

    Don Videtich - Can you say Company Suck Ass?
     
  14. eolesen

    eolesen Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Messages:
    14,603
    Likes Received:
    9,174
    Call me whatever you want, but you stand a lot more to gain from giving the perception that AA's mechanics are safety minded professionals first and foremost.
     
  15. TWU informer

    TWU informer Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    7,545
    Likes Received:
    3,758

    Well that's all fine, then defend the mechanics when you speak instead of the company. I know a few mechanics and inspectors that worked on the planes in question. But I am not going to spew any facts on this bulletin board and have HR and Legal all over my arse. There is more to this story than being reported presently.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page